Cargando…
Biomechanical analysis of force distribution in one-handed and two-handed child chest compression- a randomized crossover observational study
BACKGROUND: Even force distribution would generate efficient external chest compression (ECC). Little research has been done to compare force distribution between one-hand (OH) and two-handed (TH) during child ECC. Therefore, this study was to investigate force distribution, rescuer perceived fatigu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8783411/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35065602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-022-00566-z |
_version_ | 1784638532278550528 |
---|---|
author | Tsou, Jui-Yi Kao, Chia-Lung Tu, Yi-Fang Hong, Ming-Yuan Su, Fong-Chin Chi, Chih-Hsien |
author_facet | Tsou, Jui-Yi Kao, Chia-Lung Tu, Yi-Fang Hong, Ming-Yuan Su, Fong-Chin Chi, Chih-Hsien |
author_sort | Tsou, Jui-Yi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Even force distribution would generate efficient external chest compression (ECC). Little research has been done to compare force distribution between one-hand (OH) and two-handed (TH) during child ECC. Therefore, this study was to investigate force distribution, rescuer perceived fatigue and discomfort/pain when applying OH and TH ECC in children. METHODS: Crossover manikin study. Thirty-five emergency department registered nurses performed lone rescuer ECC using TH and OH techniques, each for 2 min at a rate of at least 100 compressions/min. A Resusci Junior Basic manikin equipped with a MatScan pressure measurement system was used to collect data. The perceived exertion scale (modified Borg scale) and numerical rating scale (NRS) was applied to evaluate the fatigue and physical pain of delivering chest compressions. RESULTS: The maximum compression force (kg) delivered was 56.58 ± 13.67 for TH and 45.12 ± 7.90 for OH ECC (p < 0.001). The maximum-minimum force difference force delivered by TH and OH ECC was 52.24 ± 13.43 and 41.36 ± 7.57, respectively (p < 0.001). The mean caudal force delivered by TH and OH ECC was 29.45 ± 16.70 and 34.03 ± 12.01, respectively (p = 0.198). The mean cranial force delivered by TH and OH ECC was 27.13 ± 11.30 and 11.09 ± 9.72, respectively (p < 0.001). The caudal–cranial pressure difference delivered by TH and OH ECC was 19.14 ± 15.96 and 26.94 ± 14.48, respectively (p = 0.016). The perceived exertion and NRS for OH ECC was higher than that of the TH method (p < 0.001, p = 0.004, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The TH method produced greater compression force, had more efficient compression, and delivered a more even force distribution, and produced less fatigue and physical pain in the rescuer than the OH method. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Cheng Kung University Institutional Review Board A-ER-103-387. http://nckuhirb.med.ncku.edu.tw/sitemap.php |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8783411 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87834112022-01-24 Biomechanical analysis of force distribution in one-handed and two-handed child chest compression- a randomized crossover observational study Tsou, Jui-Yi Kao, Chia-Lung Tu, Yi-Fang Hong, Ming-Yuan Su, Fong-Chin Chi, Chih-Hsien BMC Emerg Med Research BACKGROUND: Even force distribution would generate efficient external chest compression (ECC). Little research has been done to compare force distribution between one-hand (OH) and two-handed (TH) during child ECC. Therefore, this study was to investigate force distribution, rescuer perceived fatigue and discomfort/pain when applying OH and TH ECC in children. METHODS: Crossover manikin study. Thirty-five emergency department registered nurses performed lone rescuer ECC using TH and OH techniques, each for 2 min at a rate of at least 100 compressions/min. A Resusci Junior Basic manikin equipped with a MatScan pressure measurement system was used to collect data. The perceived exertion scale (modified Borg scale) and numerical rating scale (NRS) was applied to evaluate the fatigue and physical pain of delivering chest compressions. RESULTS: The maximum compression force (kg) delivered was 56.58 ± 13.67 for TH and 45.12 ± 7.90 for OH ECC (p < 0.001). The maximum-minimum force difference force delivered by TH and OH ECC was 52.24 ± 13.43 and 41.36 ± 7.57, respectively (p < 0.001). The mean caudal force delivered by TH and OH ECC was 29.45 ± 16.70 and 34.03 ± 12.01, respectively (p = 0.198). The mean cranial force delivered by TH and OH ECC was 27.13 ± 11.30 and 11.09 ± 9.72, respectively (p < 0.001). The caudal–cranial pressure difference delivered by TH and OH ECC was 19.14 ± 15.96 and 26.94 ± 14.48, respectively (p = 0.016). The perceived exertion and NRS for OH ECC was higher than that of the TH method (p < 0.001, p = 0.004, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The TH method produced greater compression force, had more efficient compression, and delivered a more even force distribution, and produced less fatigue and physical pain in the rescuer than the OH method. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Cheng Kung University Institutional Review Board A-ER-103-387. http://nckuhirb.med.ncku.edu.tw/sitemap.php BioMed Central 2022-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8783411/ /pubmed/35065602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-022-00566-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Tsou, Jui-Yi Kao, Chia-Lung Tu, Yi-Fang Hong, Ming-Yuan Su, Fong-Chin Chi, Chih-Hsien Biomechanical analysis of force distribution in one-handed and two-handed child chest compression- a randomized crossover observational study |
title | Biomechanical analysis of force distribution in one-handed and two-handed child chest compression- a randomized crossover observational study |
title_full | Biomechanical analysis of force distribution in one-handed and two-handed child chest compression- a randomized crossover observational study |
title_fullStr | Biomechanical analysis of force distribution in one-handed and two-handed child chest compression- a randomized crossover observational study |
title_full_unstemmed | Biomechanical analysis of force distribution in one-handed and two-handed child chest compression- a randomized crossover observational study |
title_short | Biomechanical analysis of force distribution in one-handed and two-handed child chest compression- a randomized crossover observational study |
title_sort | biomechanical analysis of force distribution in one-handed and two-handed child chest compression- a randomized crossover observational study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8783411/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35065602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12873-022-00566-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tsoujuiyi biomechanicalanalysisofforcedistributioninonehandedandtwohandedchildchestcompressionarandomizedcrossoverobservationalstudy AT kaochialung biomechanicalanalysisofforcedistributioninonehandedandtwohandedchildchestcompressionarandomizedcrossoverobservationalstudy AT tuyifang biomechanicalanalysisofforcedistributioninonehandedandtwohandedchildchestcompressionarandomizedcrossoverobservationalstudy AT hongmingyuan biomechanicalanalysisofforcedistributioninonehandedandtwohandedchildchestcompressionarandomizedcrossoverobservationalstudy AT sufongchin biomechanicalanalysisofforcedistributioninonehandedandtwohandedchildchestcompressionarandomizedcrossoverobservationalstudy AT chichihhsien biomechanicalanalysisofforcedistributioninonehandedandtwohandedchildchestcompressionarandomizedcrossoverobservationalstudy |