Cargando…

Maximum isometric torque at individually-adjusted joint angles exceeds eccentric and concentric torque in lower extremity joint actions

BACKGROUND: Previous research indicates the high relevance of optimal joint angles for individual isometric strength assessment. The objective was to compare lower limb peak isometric muscle strength abilities at the strongest joint angles with those of dynamic contractions in healthy young adults....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stotz, Andreas, Maghames, Ebrahem, Mason, Joel, Groll, Andreas, Zech, Astrid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8783437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35063013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-022-00401-9
_version_ 1784638537786720256
author Stotz, Andreas
Maghames, Ebrahem
Mason, Joel
Groll, Andreas
Zech, Astrid
author_facet Stotz, Andreas
Maghames, Ebrahem
Mason, Joel
Groll, Andreas
Zech, Astrid
author_sort Stotz, Andreas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous research indicates the high relevance of optimal joint angles for individual isometric strength assessment. The objective was to compare lower limb peak isometric muscle strength abilities at the strongest joint angles with those of dynamic contractions in healthy young adults. METHODS: Eighteen young male adults performed maximum concentric, isometric, and eccentric contractions of the ankle, knee, and hip flexors and extensors, and hip adductors and abductors in a randomized sequence on an isokinetic dynamometer (ISOMED 2000). Angular velocity was set at 60°/s. The peak of concentric contraction torque curves was used to define optimal joint angles best suited to generate maximum torque during isometric contractions. Maximum voluntary contraction torque of all contraction conditions was adjusted for limb weight and analyzed via a generalized linear mixed gamma regression model (GLMM). RESULTS: The gamma GLMM revealed strongly significant effects for all three categorical covariates (contraction types, muscle group, and test order) ([Formula: see text] ). Eccentric contraction increases the muscle torque ([Formula: see text] ) compared to concentric contraction, and isometric contraction even more ([Formula: see text] ). A moderate individual-specific variation was found (random effects standard deviation [Formula: see text] ). CONCLUSION: The results support the importance of optimal joint angles for isometric maximum strength assessment. When such conditions are given, isometric contractions can produce higher muscle torques than eccentric contractions in the lower body.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8783437
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87834372022-01-24 Maximum isometric torque at individually-adjusted joint angles exceeds eccentric and concentric torque in lower extremity joint actions Stotz, Andreas Maghames, Ebrahem Mason, Joel Groll, Andreas Zech, Astrid BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: Previous research indicates the high relevance of optimal joint angles for individual isometric strength assessment. The objective was to compare lower limb peak isometric muscle strength abilities at the strongest joint angles with those of dynamic contractions in healthy young adults. METHODS: Eighteen young male adults performed maximum concentric, isometric, and eccentric contractions of the ankle, knee, and hip flexors and extensors, and hip adductors and abductors in a randomized sequence on an isokinetic dynamometer (ISOMED 2000). Angular velocity was set at 60°/s. The peak of concentric contraction torque curves was used to define optimal joint angles best suited to generate maximum torque during isometric contractions. Maximum voluntary contraction torque of all contraction conditions was adjusted for limb weight and analyzed via a generalized linear mixed gamma regression model (GLMM). RESULTS: The gamma GLMM revealed strongly significant effects for all three categorical covariates (contraction types, muscle group, and test order) ([Formula: see text] ). Eccentric contraction increases the muscle torque ([Formula: see text] ) compared to concentric contraction, and isometric contraction even more ([Formula: see text] ). A moderate individual-specific variation was found (random effects standard deviation [Formula: see text] ). CONCLUSION: The results support the importance of optimal joint angles for isometric maximum strength assessment. When such conditions are given, isometric contractions can produce higher muscle torques than eccentric contractions in the lower body. BioMed Central 2022-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8783437/ /pubmed/35063013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-022-00401-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Stotz, Andreas
Maghames, Ebrahem
Mason, Joel
Groll, Andreas
Zech, Astrid
Maximum isometric torque at individually-adjusted joint angles exceeds eccentric and concentric torque in lower extremity joint actions
title Maximum isometric torque at individually-adjusted joint angles exceeds eccentric and concentric torque in lower extremity joint actions
title_full Maximum isometric torque at individually-adjusted joint angles exceeds eccentric and concentric torque in lower extremity joint actions
title_fullStr Maximum isometric torque at individually-adjusted joint angles exceeds eccentric and concentric torque in lower extremity joint actions
title_full_unstemmed Maximum isometric torque at individually-adjusted joint angles exceeds eccentric and concentric torque in lower extremity joint actions
title_short Maximum isometric torque at individually-adjusted joint angles exceeds eccentric and concentric torque in lower extremity joint actions
title_sort maximum isometric torque at individually-adjusted joint angles exceeds eccentric and concentric torque in lower extremity joint actions
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8783437/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35063013
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13102-022-00401-9
work_keys_str_mv AT stotzandreas maximumisometrictorqueatindividuallyadjustedjointanglesexceedseccentricandconcentrictorqueinlowerextremityjointactions
AT maghamesebrahem maximumisometrictorqueatindividuallyadjustedjointanglesexceedseccentricandconcentrictorqueinlowerextremityjointactions
AT masonjoel maximumisometrictorqueatindividuallyadjustedjointanglesexceedseccentricandconcentrictorqueinlowerextremityjointactions
AT grollandreas maximumisometrictorqueatindividuallyadjustedjointanglesexceedseccentricandconcentrictorqueinlowerextremityjointactions
AT zechastrid maximumisometrictorqueatindividuallyadjustedjointanglesexceedseccentricandconcentrictorqueinlowerextremityjointactions