Cargando…

Comparison of different sepsis scoring systems and pathways: qSOFA, SIRS, Shapiro criteria and CEC SEPSIS KILLS pathway in bacteraemic and non-bacteraemic patients presenting to the emergency department

BACKGROUND: Bacteraemia is associated with high morbidity and mortality, with delayed antibiotic treatment associated with poorer outcomes. Early identification is challenging, but clinically important. Multiple scoring systems have been developed to identify individuals in the broader categories of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sparks, Rebecca, Harada, Arisa, Chavada, Ruchir, Trethewy, Christopher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8783440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35065617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07070-6
_version_ 1784638538772381696
author Sparks, Rebecca
Harada, Arisa
Chavada, Ruchir
Trethewy, Christopher
author_facet Sparks, Rebecca
Harada, Arisa
Chavada, Ruchir
Trethewy, Christopher
author_sort Sparks, Rebecca
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bacteraemia is associated with high morbidity and mortality, with delayed antibiotic treatment associated with poorer outcomes. Early identification is challenging, but clinically important. Multiple scoring systems have been developed to identify individuals in the broader categories of sepsis. We designed this study to assess the performance of existing scoring systems and pathways—CEC SEPSIS KILLS pathway (an Australian sepsis care package), quick sequential organ failure score (qSOFA), systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and the Shapiro criteria. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study performed in two metropolitan hospitals in NSW, consisting of adult patients (> 18 years) with positive blood cultures containing a true pathogen and patients matched by age without positive blood cultures. Performance (sensitivity, specificity, and mortality prediction) of recognised sepsis and bacteraemia criteria and pathways—qSOFA, SIRS, Shapiro criteria and CEC SEPSIS KILLS pathway in the first 4 h following ED triage was assessed. RESULTS: There were 251 patients in each cohort. Sepsis-related mortality was higher in the bacteraemic group (OR 0.4, p = 0.03). Of the criteria studied, the modified Shapiro criteria had the highest sensitivity (88%) with modest specificity (37.85%), and qSOFA had the highest specificity (83.67%) with poor sensitivity (19.82%). SIRS had reasonable sensitivity (82.07%), with poor sensitivity (20.72%). The CEC SEPSIS pathway sensitivity of 70.1% and specificity of 71.1%. The SEPSIS KILLS was activated on only 14% of bacteraemic patients. CONCLUSION: The performance of all scoring systems and pathways was suboptimal in the identification of patients at risk of bacteraemia presenting to the emergency department. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-022-07070-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8783440
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87834402022-01-24 Comparison of different sepsis scoring systems and pathways: qSOFA, SIRS, Shapiro criteria and CEC SEPSIS KILLS pathway in bacteraemic and non-bacteraemic patients presenting to the emergency department Sparks, Rebecca Harada, Arisa Chavada, Ruchir Trethewy, Christopher BMC Infect Dis Research BACKGROUND: Bacteraemia is associated with high morbidity and mortality, with delayed antibiotic treatment associated with poorer outcomes. Early identification is challenging, but clinically important. Multiple scoring systems have been developed to identify individuals in the broader categories of sepsis. We designed this study to assess the performance of existing scoring systems and pathways—CEC SEPSIS KILLS pathway (an Australian sepsis care package), quick sequential organ failure score (qSOFA), systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and the Shapiro criteria. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study performed in two metropolitan hospitals in NSW, consisting of adult patients (> 18 years) with positive blood cultures containing a true pathogen and patients matched by age without positive blood cultures. Performance (sensitivity, specificity, and mortality prediction) of recognised sepsis and bacteraemia criteria and pathways—qSOFA, SIRS, Shapiro criteria and CEC SEPSIS KILLS pathway in the first 4 h following ED triage was assessed. RESULTS: There were 251 patients in each cohort. Sepsis-related mortality was higher in the bacteraemic group (OR 0.4, p = 0.03). Of the criteria studied, the modified Shapiro criteria had the highest sensitivity (88%) with modest specificity (37.85%), and qSOFA had the highest specificity (83.67%) with poor sensitivity (19.82%). SIRS had reasonable sensitivity (82.07%), with poor sensitivity (20.72%). The CEC SEPSIS pathway sensitivity of 70.1% and specificity of 71.1%. The SEPSIS KILLS was activated on only 14% of bacteraemic patients. CONCLUSION: The performance of all scoring systems and pathways was suboptimal in the identification of patients at risk of bacteraemia presenting to the emergency department. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-022-07070-6. BioMed Central 2022-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8783440/ /pubmed/35065617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07070-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Sparks, Rebecca
Harada, Arisa
Chavada, Ruchir
Trethewy, Christopher
Comparison of different sepsis scoring systems and pathways: qSOFA, SIRS, Shapiro criteria and CEC SEPSIS KILLS pathway in bacteraemic and non-bacteraemic patients presenting to the emergency department
title Comparison of different sepsis scoring systems and pathways: qSOFA, SIRS, Shapiro criteria and CEC SEPSIS KILLS pathway in bacteraemic and non-bacteraemic patients presenting to the emergency department
title_full Comparison of different sepsis scoring systems and pathways: qSOFA, SIRS, Shapiro criteria and CEC SEPSIS KILLS pathway in bacteraemic and non-bacteraemic patients presenting to the emergency department
title_fullStr Comparison of different sepsis scoring systems and pathways: qSOFA, SIRS, Shapiro criteria and CEC SEPSIS KILLS pathway in bacteraemic and non-bacteraemic patients presenting to the emergency department
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of different sepsis scoring systems and pathways: qSOFA, SIRS, Shapiro criteria and CEC SEPSIS KILLS pathway in bacteraemic and non-bacteraemic patients presenting to the emergency department
title_short Comparison of different sepsis scoring systems and pathways: qSOFA, SIRS, Shapiro criteria and CEC SEPSIS KILLS pathway in bacteraemic and non-bacteraemic patients presenting to the emergency department
title_sort comparison of different sepsis scoring systems and pathways: qsofa, sirs, shapiro criteria and cec sepsis kills pathway in bacteraemic and non-bacteraemic patients presenting to the emergency department
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8783440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35065617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07070-6
work_keys_str_mv AT sparksrebecca comparisonofdifferentsepsisscoringsystemsandpathwaysqsofasirsshapirocriteriaandcecsepsiskillspathwayinbacteraemicandnonbacteraemicpatientspresentingtotheemergencydepartment
AT haradaarisa comparisonofdifferentsepsisscoringsystemsandpathwaysqsofasirsshapirocriteriaandcecsepsiskillspathwayinbacteraemicandnonbacteraemicpatientspresentingtotheemergencydepartment
AT chavadaruchir comparisonofdifferentsepsisscoringsystemsandpathwaysqsofasirsshapirocriteriaandcecsepsiskillspathwayinbacteraemicandnonbacteraemicpatientspresentingtotheemergencydepartment
AT trethewychristopher comparisonofdifferentsepsisscoringsystemsandpathwaysqsofasirsshapirocriteriaandcecsepsiskillspathwayinbacteraemicandnonbacteraemicpatientspresentingtotheemergencydepartment