Cargando…

The cost-effectiveness of antenatal and postnatal education and support interventions for women aimed at promoting breastfeeding in the UK

BACKGROUND: Breastfeeding is associated with health benefits to mothers and babies and cost-savings to the health service. Breastfeeding rates in the UK are low for various reasons including cultural barriers, inadequate support to initiate and sustain breastfeeding, lack of information, or choice n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mavranezouli, Ifigeneia, Varley-Campbell, Jo, Stockton, Sarah, Francis, Jennifer, Macdonald, Clare, Sharma, Sunita, Fleming, Peter, Punter, Elizabeth, Barry, Charlotte, Kallioinen, Maija, Khazaezadeh, Nina, Jewell, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8783468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35062928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12446-5
_version_ 1784638545222172672
author Mavranezouli, Ifigeneia
Varley-Campbell, Jo
Stockton, Sarah
Francis, Jennifer
Macdonald, Clare
Sharma, Sunita
Fleming, Peter
Punter, Elizabeth
Barry, Charlotte
Kallioinen, Maija
Khazaezadeh, Nina
Jewell, David
author_facet Mavranezouli, Ifigeneia
Varley-Campbell, Jo
Stockton, Sarah
Francis, Jennifer
Macdonald, Clare
Sharma, Sunita
Fleming, Peter
Punter, Elizabeth
Barry, Charlotte
Kallioinen, Maija
Khazaezadeh, Nina
Jewell, David
author_sort Mavranezouli, Ifigeneia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Breastfeeding is associated with health benefits to mothers and babies and cost-savings to the health service. Breastfeeding rates in the UK are low for various reasons including cultural barriers, inadequate support to initiate and sustain breastfeeding, lack of information, or choice not to breastfeed. Education and support interventions have been developed aiming at promoting breastfeeding rates. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of such interventions for women, initiated antenatally or in the first 8 weeks postnatally, aiming at improving breastfeeding rates, in the UK. METHODS: A decision-analytic model was constructed to compare costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of a breastfeeding intervention from the perspective of health and personal social services in England. Data on intervention effectiveness and the benefits of breastfeeding were derived from systematic reviews. Other model input parameters were obtained from published sources, supplemented by expert opinion. RESULTS: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the modelled intervention added on standard care versus standard care was £51,946/QALY, suggesting that the intervention is not cost-effective under National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) criteria in England. Sensitivity analysis suggested that the cost-effectiveness of the intervention improved as its effectiveness increased and intervention cost decreased. At the base-case effect (increase in breastfeeding rates 16–26 weeks after birth by 19%), the intervention was cost-effective (<£20,000/QALY) if its cost per woman receiving the intervention became ≈£40–£45. At the base-case cost (£84), the intervention was cost-effective if it increased breastfeeding rates by at least 35–40%. CONCLUSIONS: Available breastfeeding interventions do not appear to be cost-effective under NICE criteria in England. Future breastfeeding interventions need to have higher effectiveness or lower cost compared with currently available interventions in order to become cost-effective. Public health and other societal interventions that protect, promote and support breastfeeding may be key in improving breastfeeding rates in the UK. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-12446-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8783468
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87834682022-01-24 The cost-effectiveness of antenatal and postnatal education and support interventions for women aimed at promoting breastfeeding in the UK Mavranezouli, Ifigeneia Varley-Campbell, Jo Stockton, Sarah Francis, Jennifer Macdonald, Clare Sharma, Sunita Fleming, Peter Punter, Elizabeth Barry, Charlotte Kallioinen, Maija Khazaezadeh, Nina Jewell, David BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Breastfeeding is associated with health benefits to mothers and babies and cost-savings to the health service. Breastfeeding rates in the UK are low for various reasons including cultural barriers, inadequate support to initiate and sustain breastfeeding, lack of information, or choice not to breastfeed. Education and support interventions have been developed aiming at promoting breastfeeding rates. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of such interventions for women, initiated antenatally or in the first 8 weeks postnatally, aiming at improving breastfeeding rates, in the UK. METHODS: A decision-analytic model was constructed to compare costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of a breastfeeding intervention from the perspective of health and personal social services in England. Data on intervention effectiveness and the benefits of breastfeeding were derived from systematic reviews. Other model input parameters were obtained from published sources, supplemented by expert opinion. RESULTS: The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the modelled intervention added on standard care versus standard care was £51,946/QALY, suggesting that the intervention is not cost-effective under National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) criteria in England. Sensitivity analysis suggested that the cost-effectiveness of the intervention improved as its effectiveness increased and intervention cost decreased. At the base-case effect (increase in breastfeeding rates 16–26 weeks after birth by 19%), the intervention was cost-effective (<£20,000/QALY) if its cost per woman receiving the intervention became ≈£40–£45. At the base-case cost (£84), the intervention was cost-effective if it increased breastfeeding rates by at least 35–40%. CONCLUSIONS: Available breastfeeding interventions do not appear to be cost-effective under NICE criteria in England. Future breastfeeding interventions need to have higher effectiveness or lower cost compared with currently available interventions in order to become cost-effective. Public health and other societal interventions that protect, promote and support breastfeeding may be key in improving breastfeeding rates in the UK. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-021-12446-5. BioMed Central 2022-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8783468/ /pubmed/35062928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12446-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Mavranezouli, Ifigeneia
Varley-Campbell, Jo
Stockton, Sarah
Francis, Jennifer
Macdonald, Clare
Sharma, Sunita
Fleming, Peter
Punter, Elizabeth
Barry, Charlotte
Kallioinen, Maija
Khazaezadeh, Nina
Jewell, David
The cost-effectiveness of antenatal and postnatal education and support interventions for women aimed at promoting breastfeeding in the UK
title The cost-effectiveness of antenatal and postnatal education and support interventions for women aimed at promoting breastfeeding in the UK
title_full The cost-effectiveness of antenatal and postnatal education and support interventions for women aimed at promoting breastfeeding in the UK
title_fullStr The cost-effectiveness of antenatal and postnatal education and support interventions for women aimed at promoting breastfeeding in the UK
title_full_unstemmed The cost-effectiveness of antenatal and postnatal education and support interventions for women aimed at promoting breastfeeding in the UK
title_short The cost-effectiveness of antenatal and postnatal education and support interventions for women aimed at promoting breastfeeding in the UK
title_sort cost-effectiveness of antenatal and postnatal education and support interventions for women aimed at promoting breastfeeding in the uk
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8783468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35062928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12446-5
work_keys_str_mv AT mavranezouliifigeneia thecosteffectivenessofantenatalandpostnataleducationandsupportinterventionsforwomenaimedatpromotingbreastfeedingintheuk
AT varleycampbelljo thecosteffectivenessofantenatalandpostnataleducationandsupportinterventionsforwomenaimedatpromotingbreastfeedingintheuk
AT stocktonsarah thecosteffectivenessofantenatalandpostnataleducationandsupportinterventionsforwomenaimedatpromotingbreastfeedingintheuk
AT francisjennifer thecosteffectivenessofantenatalandpostnataleducationandsupportinterventionsforwomenaimedatpromotingbreastfeedingintheuk
AT macdonaldclare thecosteffectivenessofantenatalandpostnataleducationandsupportinterventionsforwomenaimedatpromotingbreastfeedingintheuk
AT sharmasunita thecosteffectivenessofantenatalandpostnataleducationandsupportinterventionsforwomenaimedatpromotingbreastfeedingintheuk
AT flemingpeter thecosteffectivenessofantenatalandpostnataleducationandsupportinterventionsforwomenaimedatpromotingbreastfeedingintheuk
AT punterelizabeth thecosteffectivenessofantenatalandpostnataleducationandsupportinterventionsforwomenaimedatpromotingbreastfeedingintheuk
AT barrycharlotte thecosteffectivenessofantenatalandpostnataleducationandsupportinterventionsforwomenaimedatpromotingbreastfeedingintheuk
AT kallioinenmaija thecosteffectivenessofantenatalandpostnataleducationandsupportinterventionsforwomenaimedatpromotingbreastfeedingintheuk
AT khazaezadehnina thecosteffectivenessofantenatalandpostnataleducationandsupportinterventionsforwomenaimedatpromotingbreastfeedingintheuk
AT jewelldavid thecosteffectivenessofantenatalandpostnataleducationandsupportinterventionsforwomenaimedatpromotingbreastfeedingintheuk
AT mavranezouliifigeneia costeffectivenessofantenatalandpostnataleducationandsupportinterventionsforwomenaimedatpromotingbreastfeedingintheuk
AT varleycampbelljo costeffectivenessofantenatalandpostnataleducationandsupportinterventionsforwomenaimedatpromotingbreastfeedingintheuk
AT stocktonsarah costeffectivenessofantenatalandpostnataleducationandsupportinterventionsforwomenaimedatpromotingbreastfeedingintheuk
AT francisjennifer costeffectivenessofantenatalandpostnataleducationandsupportinterventionsforwomenaimedatpromotingbreastfeedingintheuk
AT macdonaldclare costeffectivenessofantenatalandpostnataleducationandsupportinterventionsforwomenaimedatpromotingbreastfeedingintheuk
AT sharmasunita costeffectivenessofantenatalandpostnataleducationandsupportinterventionsforwomenaimedatpromotingbreastfeedingintheuk
AT flemingpeter costeffectivenessofantenatalandpostnataleducationandsupportinterventionsforwomenaimedatpromotingbreastfeedingintheuk
AT punterelizabeth costeffectivenessofantenatalandpostnataleducationandsupportinterventionsforwomenaimedatpromotingbreastfeedingintheuk
AT barrycharlotte costeffectivenessofantenatalandpostnataleducationandsupportinterventionsforwomenaimedatpromotingbreastfeedingintheuk
AT kallioinenmaija costeffectivenessofantenatalandpostnataleducationandsupportinterventionsforwomenaimedatpromotingbreastfeedingintheuk
AT khazaezadehnina costeffectivenessofantenatalandpostnataleducationandsupportinterventionsforwomenaimedatpromotingbreastfeedingintheuk
AT jewelldavid costeffectivenessofantenatalandpostnataleducationandsupportinterventionsforwomenaimedatpromotingbreastfeedingintheuk