Cargando…

Clinical Evaluation of a Novel CGM-Informed Bolus Calculator with Automatic Glucose Trend Adjustment

Background: Expert opinion guidelines and limited data from clinical trials recommend adjustment to bolus insulin doses based on continuous glucose monitor (CGM) trend data, yet minimal evidence exists to support this approach. We performed a clinical evaluation of a novel CGM-informed bolus calcula...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pinsker, Jordan E., Church, Mei Mei, Brown, Sue A., Voelmle, Mary K., Bode, Bruce W., Narron, Brooke, Huyett, Lauren M., Lee, Joon Bok, O'Connor, Jason, Benjamin, Eric, Dumais, Bonnie, Ly, Trang T.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8783627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34491825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2021.0140
_version_ 1784638575155871744
author Pinsker, Jordan E.
Church, Mei Mei
Brown, Sue A.
Voelmle, Mary K.
Bode, Bruce W.
Narron, Brooke
Huyett, Lauren M.
Lee, Joon Bok
O'Connor, Jason
Benjamin, Eric
Dumais, Bonnie
Ly, Trang T.
author_facet Pinsker, Jordan E.
Church, Mei Mei
Brown, Sue A.
Voelmle, Mary K.
Bode, Bruce W.
Narron, Brooke
Huyett, Lauren M.
Lee, Joon Bok
O'Connor, Jason
Benjamin, Eric
Dumais, Bonnie
Ly, Trang T.
author_sort Pinsker, Jordan E.
collection PubMed
description Background: Expert opinion guidelines and limited data from clinical trials recommend adjustment to bolus insulin doses based on continuous glucose monitor (CGM) trend data, yet minimal evidence exists to support this approach. We performed a clinical evaluation of a novel CGM-informed bolus calculator (CIBC) with automatic insulin bolus dose adjustment based on CGM trend used with sensor-augmented pump therapy. Materials and Methods: In this multicenter, outpatient study, participants 6–70 years of age with type 1 diabetes (T1D) used the Omnipod(®) 5 System in Manual Mode, first for 7 days without a connected CGM (standard bolus calculator, SBC, phase 1) and then for 7 days with a connected CGM using the CIBC (CIBC phase 2). The integrated bolus calculator used stored pump settings plus user-estimated meal size and/or either a manually entered capillary glucose value (SBC phase) or an imported current CGM value and trend (CIBC phase) to recommend a bolus amount. The CIBC automatically increased or decreased the suggested bolus amount based on the CGM trend. Results: Twenty-five participants, (mean ± standard deviation) 27 ± 15 years of age, with T1D duration 12 ± 9 years and A1C 7.0% ± 0.9% completed the study. There were significantly fewer sensor readings <70 mg/dL 4 h postbolus with the CIBC compared to the SBC (2.1% ± 2.0% vs. 2.8 ± 2.7, P = 0.03), while percent of sensor readings >180 and 70–180 mg/dL remained the same. There was no difference in insulin use or number of boluses given between the two phases. Conclusion: The CIBC was safe when used with the Omnipod 5 System in Manual Mode, with fewer hypoglycemic readings in the postbolus period compared to the SBC. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04320069).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8783627
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87836272022-01-24 Clinical Evaluation of a Novel CGM-Informed Bolus Calculator with Automatic Glucose Trend Adjustment Pinsker, Jordan E. Church, Mei Mei Brown, Sue A. Voelmle, Mary K. Bode, Bruce W. Narron, Brooke Huyett, Lauren M. Lee, Joon Bok O'Connor, Jason Benjamin, Eric Dumais, Bonnie Ly, Trang T. Diabetes Technol Ther Original Articles Background: Expert opinion guidelines and limited data from clinical trials recommend adjustment to bolus insulin doses based on continuous glucose monitor (CGM) trend data, yet minimal evidence exists to support this approach. We performed a clinical evaluation of a novel CGM-informed bolus calculator (CIBC) with automatic insulin bolus dose adjustment based on CGM trend used with sensor-augmented pump therapy. Materials and Methods: In this multicenter, outpatient study, participants 6–70 years of age with type 1 diabetes (T1D) used the Omnipod(®) 5 System in Manual Mode, first for 7 days without a connected CGM (standard bolus calculator, SBC, phase 1) and then for 7 days with a connected CGM using the CIBC (CIBC phase 2). The integrated bolus calculator used stored pump settings plus user-estimated meal size and/or either a manually entered capillary glucose value (SBC phase) or an imported current CGM value and trend (CIBC phase) to recommend a bolus amount. The CIBC automatically increased or decreased the suggested bolus amount based on the CGM trend. Results: Twenty-five participants, (mean ± standard deviation) 27 ± 15 years of age, with T1D duration 12 ± 9 years and A1C 7.0% ± 0.9% completed the study. There were significantly fewer sensor readings <70 mg/dL 4 h postbolus with the CIBC compared to the SBC (2.1% ± 2.0% vs. 2.8 ± 2.7, P = 0.03), while percent of sensor readings >180 and 70–180 mg/dL remained the same. There was no difference in insulin use or number of boluses given between the two phases. Conclusion: The CIBC was safe when used with the Omnipod 5 System in Manual Mode, with fewer hypoglycemic readings in the postbolus period compared to the SBC. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04320069). Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2022-01-01 2022-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8783627/ /pubmed/34491825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2021.0140 Text en © Jordan E. Pinsker, et al., 2022; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License [CC-BY] (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Pinsker, Jordan E.
Church, Mei Mei
Brown, Sue A.
Voelmle, Mary K.
Bode, Bruce W.
Narron, Brooke
Huyett, Lauren M.
Lee, Joon Bok
O'Connor, Jason
Benjamin, Eric
Dumais, Bonnie
Ly, Trang T.
Clinical Evaluation of a Novel CGM-Informed Bolus Calculator with Automatic Glucose Trend Adjustment
title Clinical Evaluation of a Novel CGM-Informed Bolus Calculator with Automatic Glucose Trend Adjustment
title_full Clinical Evaluation of a Novel CGM-Informed Bolus Calculator with Automatic Glucose Trend Adjustment
title_fullStr Clinical Evaluation of a Novel CGM-Informed Bolus Calculator with Automatic Glucose Trend Adjustment
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Evaluation of a Novel CGM-Informed Bolus Calculator with Automatic Glucose Trend Adjustment
title_short Clinical Evaluation of a Novel CGM-Informed Bolus Calculator with Automatic Glucose Trend Adjustment
title_sort clinical evaluation of a novel cgm-informed bolus calculator with automatic glucose trend adjustment
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8783627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34491825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2021.0140
work_keys_str_mv AT pinskerjordane clinicalevaluationofanovelcgminformedboluscalculatorwithautomaticglucosetrendadjustment
AT churchmeimei clinicalevaluationofanovelcgminformedboluscalculatorwithautomaticglucosetrendadjustment
AT brownsuea clinicalevaluationofanovelcgminformedboluscalculatorwithautomaticglucosetrendadjustment
AT voelmlemaryk clinicalevaluationofanovelcgminformedboluscalculatorwithautomaticglucosetrendadjustment
AT bodebrucew clinicalevaluationofanovelcgminformedboluscalculatorwithautomaticglucosetrendadjustment
AT narronbrooke clinicalevaluationofanovelcgminformedboluscalculatorwithautomaticglucosetrendadjustment
AT huyettlaurenm clinicalevaluationofanovelcgminformedboluscalculatorwithautomaticglucosetrendadjustment
AT leejoonbok clinicalevaluationofanovelcgminformedboluscalculatorwithautomaticglucosetrendadjustment
AT oconnorjason clinicalevaluationofanovelcgminformedboluscalculatorwithautomaticglucosetrendadjustment
AT benjamineric clinicalevaluationofanovelcgminformedboluscalculatorwithautomaticglucosetrendadjustment
AT dumaisbonnie clinicalevaluationofanovelcgminformedboluscalculatorwithautomaticglucosetrendadjustment
AT lytrangt clinicalevaluationofanovelcgminformedboluscalculatorwithautomaticglucosetrendadjustment