Cargando…

Perfusion-Diffusion Ratio: A New IVIM Approach in Differentiating Solid Benign and Malignant Primary Lesions of the Liver

INTRODUCTION: In order to improve the efficacy of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) parameters in characterising specific tissues, a new concept is introduced: the perfusion–diffusion ratio (PDR), which expresses the relationship between the signal S(b) decline rate as a result of IVIM and the rat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Podgórska, Joanna, Pasicz, Katarzyna, Skrzyński, Witold, Gołębiewski, Bogumił, Kuś, Piotr, Jasieniak, Jakub, Kiliszczyk, Anna, Rogowska, Agnieszka, Benkert, Thomas, Pałucki, Jakub, Grabska, Iwona, Fabiszewska, Ewa, Jagielska, Beata, Kukołowicz, Paweł, Cieszanowski, Andrzej
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8783718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35075424
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/2957759
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: In order to improve the efficacy of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) parameters in characterising specific tissues, a new concept is introduced: the perfusion–diffusion ratio (PDR), which expresses the relationship between the signal S(b) decline rate as a result of IVIM and the rate of signal S(b) decline due to diffusion. The aim of this study was to investigate this novel approach in the differentiation of solid primary liver lesions. Material and Methods. Eighty-three patients referred for liver MRI between August 2017 and January 2020 with a suspected liver tumour were prospectively examined with the standard liver MRI protocol extended by DWI-IVIM sequence. Patients with no liver lesions, haemangiomas, or metastases were excluded. The final study population consisted of 34 patients with primary solid liver masses, 9 with FNH, 4 with regenerative nodules, 10 with HCC, and 11 with CCC. The PDR coefficient was introduced, defined as the ratio of the rate of signal S(b) decrease due to the IVIM effect to the rate of signal S(b) decrease due to the diffusion process, for b = 0. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between benign and malignant lesions in the case of IVIM parameters (f, D, or D(∗)) and ADC. Significant differences were observed only for PDR, with lower values for malignant lesions (p = 0.03). The ROC analysis yielded an AUC value for PDR equal to 0.74, with a cut-off value of 5.06, sensitivity of 81%, specificity of 77%, and accuracy of 79%. CONCLUSION: PDR proved to be more effective than IVIM parameters and ADC in the differentiation of solid benign and malignant primary liver lesions.