Cargando…

Socioeconomic deprivation, age and language are barriers to accessing personal health records: a cross-sectional study of a large hospital-based personal health record system

OBJECTIVES: To investigate barriers to accessing a hospital-based personal health record (PHR) system. DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study. SETTING: This study was conducted in a large secondary and tertiary acute care trust in Birmingham, UK. PARTICIPANTS: Data were collected from 28 637 pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chapman, Rachel, Haroon, Shamil, Simms-Williams, Nikita, Bhala, Neeraj, Miah, Foyzal, Nirantharakumar, Krishnarajah, Ferguson, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8783813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35058264
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054655
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: To investigate barriers to accessing a hospital-based personal health record (PHR) system. DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study. SETTING: This study was conducted in a large secondary and tertiary acute care trust in Birmingham, UK. PARTICIPANTS: Data were collected from 28 637 patients who attended liver medicine, diabetes, renal medicine or endocrinology specialist outpatient clinics from 1 June 2017 to 31 May 2018. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was sign up to and activation of the PHR. The secondary outcomes were the use of the PHR, defined as the number of logons and frequency of access of specific PHR functions. RESULTS: 8070 patients (28.2%) were signed up to the PHR and 4286 patients (53.1% of those signed up) went on to activate their PHR account. Patients aged 75 years and older were significantly less likely to be signed up (adjusted OR, aOR 0.40, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.44) or to activate (aOR 0.39, 0.32 to 0.47) their PHR than patients aged 35–54. Patients who did not need an interpreter were more likely to be signed up (aOR 1.63, 95% CI 1.33 to 1.99) and to activate (aOR 3.16, 95% CI 1.96 to 5.09) their PHR. Patients living in the least deprived areas were more than twice as likely to be signed up (aOR 2.31, 95% CI 2.04 to 2.63), and were three times more likely to activate their PHR (aOR 2.99, 95% CI 2.40 to 3.71), than those in the most deprived. CONCLUSION: Socioeconomic deprivation, older age and non-English language were significant barriers to accessing a hospital-based PHR. Strategies are needed to account for these factors to ensure that PHRs do not widen health inequalities.