Cargando…
Assessing Pelvic Tilt in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Sensor Technology
BACKGROUND: The purpose of our study was to assess the accuracy of a commercially available wearable sensor in replicating pelvic tilt movement in both the sitting and standing position in patients before total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: This prospective study evaluated patients undergoing a primary...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8784288/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35106344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2021.11.018 |
_version_ | 1784638703309684736 |
---|---|
author | Sharma, Abhinav K. Vigdorchik, Jonathan M. Kolin, David A. Elbuluk, Ameer M. Windsor, Eric N. Jerabek, Seth A. |
author_facet | Sharma, Abhinav K. Vigdorchik, Jonathan M. Kolin, David A. Elbuluk, Ameer M. Windsor, Eric N. Jerabek, Seth A. |
author_sort | Sharma, Abhinav K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The purpose of our study was to assess the accuracy of a commercially available wearable sensor in replicating pelvic tilt movement in both the sitting and standing position in patients before total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: This prospective study evaluated patients undergoing a primary unilateral total hip arthroplasty by a single surgeon. Patients were excluded if they had a body mass index (BMI) greater than 40 kg/m(2). Two sensors were adhered directly to patients’ skin at S2 and T12. The S2 angle was recorded on the sensor at maximum flexion and extension angles and compared with pelvic tilt measurements on both sitting and standing radiographs. The primary outcomes recorded were patients’ pelvic tilts measured using radiographs (PT-RAD) and sensors (PT-SEN), with Pearson correlation coefficients and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) calculated. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients (35 males and 26 females) with an average age of 61.5 ± 8.5 years and BMI of 26.9 ± 4.1 kg/m(2) were analyzed. The mean prestanding PT-RAD and PT-SEN were 1.5 ± 8.3 and 1.0 ± 8.1, respectively, with an ICC of 0.98 (95% confidence interval, 0.96-0.99). The mean presitting PT-RAD and PT-SEN were -21.9 ± 12.5 and -20.9 ± 11.7, respectively, with an ICC of 0.97 (95% confidence interval, 0.95-0.98). The multiple R(2) was 0.95 for the prestanding and presitting comparisons. The R(2) for all comparisons between PT-RAD and PT-SEN was >0.85, regardless of BMI or sex. CONCLUSIONS: Although the use of wearable technology may have limitations, based on our results, a wearable sensor is accurate in replicating pelvic tilt movement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8784288 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87842882022-01-31 Assessing Pelvic Tilt in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Sensor Technology Sharma, Abhinav K. Vigdorchik, Jonathan M. Kolin, David A. Elbuluk, Ameer M. Windsor, Eric N. Jerabek, Seth A. Arthroplast Today Original Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of our study was to assess the accuracy of a commercially available wearable sensor in replicating pelvic tilt movement in both the sitting and standing position in patients before total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: This prospective study evaluated patients undergoing a primary unilateral total hip arthroplasty by a single surgeon. Patients were excluded if they had a body mass index (BMI) greater than 40 kg/m(2). Two sensors were adhered directly to patients’ skin at S2 and T12. The S2 angle was recorded on the sensor at maximum flexion and extension angles and compared with pelvic tilt measurements on both sitting and standing radiographs. The primary outcomes recorded were patients’ pelvic tilts measured using radiographs (PT-RAD) and sensors (PT-SEN), with Pearson correlation coefficients and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) calculated. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients (35 males and 26 females) with an average age of 61.5 ± 8.5 years and BMI of 26.9 ± 4.1 kg/m(2) were analyzed. The mean prestanding PT-RAD and PT-SEN were 1.5 ± 8.3 and 1.0 ± 8.1, respectively, with an ICC of 0.98 (95% confidence interval, 0.96-0.99). The mean presitting PT-RAD and PT-SEN were -21.9 ± 12.5 and -20.9 ± 11.7, respectively, with an ICC of 0.97 (95% confidence interval, 0.95-0.98). The multiple R(2) was 0.95 for the prestanding and presitting comparisons. The R(2) for all comparisons between PT-RAD and PT-SEN was >0.85, regardless of BMI or sex. CONCLUSIONS: Although the use of wearable technology may have limitations, based on our results, a wearable sensor is accurate in replicating pelvic tilt movement. Elsevier 2022-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8784288/ /pubmed/35106344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2021.11.018 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Sharma, Abhinav K. Vigdorchik, Jonathan M. Kolin, David A. Elbuluk, Ameer M. Windsor, Eric N. Jerabek, Seth A. Assessing Pelvic Tilt in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Sensor Technology |
title | Assessing Pelvic Tilt in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Sensor Technology |
title_full | Assessing Pelvic Tilt in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Sensor Technology |
title_fullStr | Assessing Pelvic Tilt in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Sensor Technology |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing Pelvic Tilt in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Sensor Technology |
title_short | Assessing Pelvic Tilt in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Sensor Technology |
title_sort | assessing pelvic tilt in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty using sensor technology |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8784288/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35106344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2021.11.018 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sharmaabhinavk assessingpelvictiltinpatientsundergoingtotalhiparthroplastyusingsensortechnology AT vigdorchikjonathanm assessingpelvictiltinpatientsundergoingtotalhiparthroplastyusingsensortechnology AT kolindavida assessingpelvictiltinpatientsundergoingtotalhiparthroplastyusingsensortechnology AT elbulukameerm assessingpelvictiltinpatientsundergoingtotalhiparthroplastyusingsensortechnology AT windsorericn assessingpelvictiltinpatientsundergoingtotalhiparthroplastyusingsensortechnology AT jerabeksetha assessingpelvictiltinpatientsundergoingtotalhiparthroplastyusingsensortechnology |