Cargando…

Comparison of Two-Dimensional- and Three-Dimensional-Based U-Net Architectures for Brain Tissue Classification in One-Dimensional Brain CT

Brain tissue segmentation plays a crucial role in feature extraction, volumetric quantification, and morphometric analysis of brain scans. For the assessment of brain structure and integrity, CT is a non-invasive, cheaper, faster, and more widely available modality than MRI. However, the clinical ap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Srikrishna, Meera, Heckemann, Rolf A., Pereira, Joana B., Volpe, Giovanni, Zettergren, Anna, Kern, Silke, Westman, Eric, Skoog, Ingmar, Schöll, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8784554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35082608
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2021.785244
_version_ 1784638766494777344
author Srikrishna, Meera
Heckemann, Rolf A.
Pereira, Joana B.
Volpe, Giovanni
Zettergren, Anna
Kern, Silke
Westman, Eric
Skoog, Ingmar
Schöll, Michael
author_facet Srikrishna, Meera
Heckemann, Rolf A.
Pereira, Joana B.
Volpe, Giovanni
Zettergren, Anna
Kern, Silke
Westman, Eric
Skoog, Ingmar
Schöll, Michael
author_sort Srikrishna, Meera
collection PubMed
description Brain tissue segmentation plays a crucial role in feature extraction, volumetric quantification, and morphometric analysis of brain scans. For the assessment of brain structure and integrity, CT is a non-invasive, cheaper, faster, and more widely available modality than MRI. However, the clinical application of CT is mostly limited to the visual assessment of brain integrity and exclusion of copathologies. We have previously developed two-dimensional (2D) deep learning-based segmentation networks that successfully classified brain tissue in head CT. Recently, deep learning-based MRI segmentation models successfully use patch-based three-dimensional (3D) segmentation networks. In this study, we aimed to develop patch-based 3D segmentation networks for CT brain tissue classification. Furthermore, we aimed to compare the performance of 2D- and 3D-based segmentation networks to perform brain tissue classification in anisotropic CT scans. For this purpose, we developed 2D and 3D U-Net-based deep learning models that were trained and validated on MR-derived segmentations from scans of 744 participants of the Gothenburg H70 Cohort with both CT and T1-weighted MRI scans acquired timely close to each other. Segmentation performance of both 2D and 3D models was evaluated on 234 unseen datasets using measures of distance, spatial similarity, and tissue volume. Single-task slice-wise processed 2D U-Nets performed better than multitask patch-based 3D U-Nets in CT brain tissue classification. These findings provide support to the use of 2D U-Nets to segment brain tissue in one-dimensional (1D) CT. This could increase the application of CT to detect brain abnormalities in clinical settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8784554
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87845542022-01-25 Comparison of Two-Dimensional- and Three-Dimensional-Based U-Net Architectures for Brain Tissue Classification in One-Dimensional Brain CT Srikrishna, Meera Heckemann, Rolf A. Pereira, Joana B. Volpe, Giovanni Zettergren, Anna Kern, Silke Westman, Eric Skoog, Ingmar Schöll, Michael Front Comput Neurosci Neuroscience Brain tissue segmentation plays a crucial role in feature extraction, volumetric quantification, and morphometric analysis of brain scans. For the assessment of brain structure and integrity, CT is a non-invasive, cheaper, faster, and more widely available modality than MRI. However, the clinical application of CT is mostly limited to the visual assessment of brain integrity and exclusion of copathologies. We have previously developed two-dimensional (2D) deep learning-based segmentation networks that successfully classified brain tissue in head CT. Recently, deep learning-based MRI segmentation models successfully use patch-based three-dimensional (3D) segmentation networks. In this study, we aimed to develop patch-based 3D segmentation networks for CT brain tissue classification. Furthermore, we aimed to compare the performance of 2D- and 3D-based segmentation networks to perform brain tissue classification in anisotropic CT scans. For this purpose, we developed 2D and 3D U-Net-based deep learning models that were trained and validated on MR-derived segmentations from scans of 744 participants of the Gothenburg H70 Cohort with both CT and T1-weighted MRI scans acquired timely close to each other. Segmentation performance of both 2D and 3D models was evaluated on 234 unseen datasets using measures of distance, spatial similarity, and tissue volume. Single-task slice-wise processed 2D U-Nets performed better than multitask patch-based 3D U-Nets in CT brain tissue classification. These findings provide support to the use of 2D U-Nets to segment brain tissue in one-dimensional (1D) CT. This could increase the application of CT to detect brain abnormalities in clinical settings. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8784554/ /pubmed/35082608 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2021.785244 Text en Copyright © 2022 Srikrishna, Heckemann, Pereira, Volpe, Zettergren, Kern, Westman, Skoog and Schöll. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Srikrishna, Meera
Heckemann, Rolf A.
Pereira, Joana B.
Volpe, Giovanni
Zettergren, Anna
Kern, Silke
Westman, Eric
Skoog, Ingmar
Schöll, Michael
Comparison of Two-Dimensional- and Three-Dimensional-Based U-Net Architectures for Brain Tissue Classification in One-Dimensional Brain CT
title Comparison of Two-Dimensional- and Three-Dimensional-Based U-Net Architectures for Brain Tissue Classification in One-Dimensional Brain CT
title_full Comparison of Two-Dimensional- and Three-Dimensional-Based U-Net Architectures for Brain Tissue Classification in One-Dimensional Brain CT
title_fullStr Comparison of Two-Dimensional- and Three-Dimensional-Based U-Net Architectures for Brain Tissue Classification in One-Dimensional Brain CT
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Two-Dimensional- and Three-Dimensional-Based U-Net Architectures for Brain Tissue Classification in One-Dimensional Brain CT
title_short Comparison of Two-Dimensional- and Three-Dimensional-Based U-Net Architectures for Brain Tissue Classification in One-Dimensional Brain CT
title_sort comparison of two-dimensional- and three-dimensional-based u-net architectures for brain tissue classification in one-dimensional brain ct
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8784554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35082608
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2021.785244
work_keys_str_mv AT srikrishnameera comparisonoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalbasedunetarchitecturesforbraintissueclassificationinonedimensionalbrainct
AT heckemannrolfa comparisonoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalbasedunetarchitecturesforbraintissueclassificationinonedimensionalbrainct
AT pereirajoanab comparisonoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalbasedunetarchitecturesforbraintissueclassificationinonedimensionalbrainct
AT volpegiovanni comparisonoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalbasedunetarchitecturesforbraintissueclassificationinonedimensionalbrainct
AT zettergrenanna comparisonoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalbasedunetarchitecturesforbraintissueclassificationinonedimensionalbrainct
AT kernsilke comparisonoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalbasedunetarchitecturesforbraintissueclassificationinonedimensionalbrainct
AT westmaneric comparisonoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalbasedunetarchitecturesforbraintissueclassificationinonedimensionalbrainct
AT skoogingmar comparisonoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalbasedunetarchitecturesforbraintissueclassificationinonedimensionalbrainct
AT schollmichael comparisonoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalbasedunetarchitecturesforbraintissueclassificationinonedimensionalbrainct