Cargando…
Debate on mandatory COVID-19 vaccination
BACKGROUND: Since January 2020, worldwide public health has been threatened by COVID-19, for which vaccines have been adopted from December 2020. DISCUSSION: Although vaccines demonstrate effectiveness against this disease, vaccine hesitancy reveals concerns towards short-term and long-term side eff...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Masson SAS.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8784578/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35097181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jemep.2022.100761 |
_version_ | 1784638770731024384 |
---|---|
author | Cheng, F.K. |
author_facet | Cheng, F.K. |
author_sort | Cheng, F.K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Since January 2020, worldwide public health has been threatened by COVID-19, for which vaccines have been adopted from December 2020. DISCUSSION: Although vaccines demonstrate effectiveness against this disease, vaccine hesitancy reveals concerns towards short-term and long-term side effects or adverse reactions such as post-inoculation death. Mandatory vaccination is used to provide herd immunity, but is refutable due to infringement of human rights and autonomy. Furthermore, the evidence testifies that vaccination cannot guarantee prevention of infection or re-infection, resulting in public resentment against this coercive measure, whilst post-inoculation anxiety continues. PERSPECTIVE: This discussion suggests a holistic approach, involving the collective efforts of governments, medical experts and individuals, through basic preventive measures and alternative therapy to live with COVID-19 in a healthy and resourceful manner. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8784578 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier Masson SAS. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87845782022-01-24 Debate on mandatory COVID-19 vaccination Cheng, F.K. Ethics Med Public Health Original Article BACKGROUND: Since January 2020, worldwide public health has been threatened by COVID-19, for which vaccines have been adopted from December 2020. DISCUSSION: Although vaccines demonstrate effectiveness against this disease, vaccine hesitancy reveals concerns towards short-term and long-term side effects or adverse reactions such as post-inoculation death. Mandatory vaccination is used to provide herd immunity, but is refutable due to infringement of human rights and autonomy. Furthermore, the evidence testifies that vaccination cannot guarantee prevention of infection or re-infection, resulting in public resentment against this coercive measure, whilst post-inoculation anxiety continues. PERSPECTIVE: This discussion suggests a holistic approach, involving the collective efforts of governments, medical experts and individuals, through basic preventive measures and alternative therapy to live with COVID-19 in a healthy and resourceful manner. Elsevier Masson SAS. 2022-04 2022-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8784578/ /pubmed/35097181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jemep.2022.100761 Text en © 2022 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Cheng, F.K. Debate on mandatory COVID-19 vaccination |
title | Debate on mandatory COVID-19 vaccination |
title_full | Debate on mandatory COVID-19 vaccination |
title_fullStr | Debate on mandatory COVID-19 vaccination |
title_full_unstemmed | Debate on mandatory COVID-19 vaccination |
title_short | Debate on mandatory COVID-19 vaccination |
title_sort | debate on mandatory covid-19 vaccination |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8784578/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35097181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jemep.2022.100761 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chengfk debateonmandatorycovid19vaccination |