Cargando…
Efficacy and Safety of Faecal Microbiota Transplantation for Acute Pancreatitis: A Randomised, Controlled Study
Aims: We investigated whether faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) decreases intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and improves gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction and infectious complications in acute pancreatitis (AP). Methods: In this first randomised, single-blind, parallel-group, controlled study, we...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8784600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35083238 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.772454 |
_version_ | 1784638776248631296 |
---|---|
author | Ding, Ling He, Cong Li, Xueyang Huang, Xin Lei, Yupeng Ke, Huajing Chen, Hongyan Yang, Qinyu Cai, Yan Liao, Yuanhang He, Wenhua Xia, Liang Xiong, Huifang Lu, Nonghua Zhu, Yin |
author_facet | Ding, Ling He, Cong Li, Xueyang Huang, Xin Lei, Yupeng Ke, Huajing Chen, Hongyan Yang, Qinyu Cai, Yan Liao, Yuanhang He, Wenhua Xia, Liang Xiong, Huifang Lu, Nonghua Zhu, Yin |
author_sort | Ding, Ling |
collection | PubMed |
description | Aims: We investigated whether faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) decreases intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and improves gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction and infectious complications in acute pancreatitis (AP). Methods: In this first randomised, single-blind, parallel-group, controlled study, we recruited and enrolled consecutive patients with AP complicated with GI dysfunction. Eligible participants were randomly assigned to receive faecal transplant (n = 30) or normal saline (n = 30) via a nasoduodenal tube once and then again 2 days later. The primary endpoint was the rate of IAP decline; secondary endpoints were GI function, infectious complications, organ failure, hospital stay and mortality. Analyses were based on intention to treat. Results: We enrolled 60 participants and randomly assigned them to the FMT (n = 30) or control (n = 30) group. Baseline characteristics and disease severity were similar for both groups. IAP decreased significantly 1 week after intervention in both groups, with no difference in the IAP decline rate between FMT and Control group [0.1 (−0.6, 0.5) vs. 0.2 (−0.2, 0.6); P = 0.27]. Normal gastrointestinal failure (GIF) scores were achieved in 12 (40%) patients in the FMT group and 14 (47%) in the control group, with no significant difference (P = 0.60). However, D-lactate was significantly elevated in the FMT group compared to the control group, as calculated by the rate of decline [−0.3 (−3.7, 0.8) vs. 0.4 (−1.1, 0.9); P = 0.01]. Infectious complications occurred in 15 (50%) and 16 (53.33%) patients in the FMT and control groups, respectively (P = 0.80). However, interleukin-6 (IL-6) was significantly elevated in the FMT group compared to the control group, as calculated by the rate of decline [0.4 (−3.6, 0.9) vs. 0.8 (−1.7, 1.0); P = 0.03]. One participant experienced transient nausea immediately after FMT, but no serious adverse events were attributed to FMT. Conclusion: FMT had no obvious effect on IAP and infectious complications in AP patients, though GI barrier indictors might be adversely affected. Further multi-centre studies are needed to confirm our findings. The study was registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02318134). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8784600 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87846002022-01-25 Efficacy and Safety of Faecal Microbiota Transplantation for Acute Pancreatitis: A Randomised, Controlled Study Ding, Ling He, Cong Li, Xueyang Huang, Xin Lei, Yupeng Ke, Huajing Chen, Hongyan Yang, Qinyu Cai, Yan Liao, Yuanhang He, Wenhua Xia, Liang Xiong, Huifang Lu, Nonghua Zhu, Yin Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Aims: We investigated whether faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) decreases intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and improves gastrointestinal (GI) dysfunction and infectious complications in acute pancreatitis (AP). Methods: In this first randomised, single-blind, parallel-group, controlled study, we recruited and enrolled consecutive patients with AP complicated with GI dysfunction. Eligible participants were randomly assigned to receive faecal transplant (n = 30) or normal saline (n = 30) via a nasoduodenal tube once and then again 2 days later. The primary endpoint was the rate of IAP decline; secondary endpoints were GI function, infectious complications, organ failure, hospital stay and mortality. Analyses were based on intention to treat. Results: We enrolled 60 participants and randomly assigned them to the FMT (n = 30) or control (n = 30) group. Baseline characteristics and disease severity were similar for both groups. IAP decreased significantly 1 week after intervention in both groups, with no difference in the IAP decline rate between FMT and Control group [0.1 (−0.6, 0.5) vs. 0.2 (−0.2, 0.6); P = 0.27]. Normal gastrointestinal failure (GIF) scores were achieved in 12 (40%) patients in the FMT group and 14 (47%) in the control group, with no significant difference (P = 0.60). However, D-lactate was significantly elevated in the FMT group compared to the control group, as calculated by the rate of decline [−0.3 (−3.7, 0.8) vs. 0.4 (−1.1, 0.9); P = 0.01]. Infectious complications occurred in 15 (50%) and 16 (53.33%) patients in the FMT and control groups, respectively (P = 0.80). However, interleukin-6 (IL-6) was significantly elevated in the FMT group compared to the control group, as calculated by the rate of decline [0.4 (−3.6, 0.9) vs. 0.8 (−1.7, 1.0); P = 0.03]. One participant experienced transient nausea immediately after FMT, but no serious adverse events were attributed to FMT. Conclusion: FMT had no obvious effect on IAP and infectious complications in AP patients, though GI barrier indictors might be adversely affected. Further multi-centre studies are needed to confirm our findings. The study was registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02318134). Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8784600/ /pubmed/35083238 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.772454 Text en Copyright © 2022 Ding, He, Li, Huang, Lei, Ke, Chen, Yang, Cai, Liao, He, Xia, Xiong, Lu and Zhu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Medicine Ding, Ling He, Cong Li, Xueyang Huang, Xin Lei, Yupeng Ke, Huajing Chen, Hongyan Yang, Qinyu Cai, Yan Liao, Yuanhang He, Wenhua Xia, Liang Xiong, Huifang Lu, Nonghua Zhu, Yin Efficacy and Safety of Faecal Microbiota Transplantation for Acute Pancreatitis: A Randomised, Controlled Study |
title | Efficacy and Safety of Faecal Microbiota Transplantation for Acute Pancreatitis: A Randomised, Controlled Study |
title_full | Efficacy and Safety of Faecal Microbiota Transplantation for Acute Pancreatitis: A Randomised, Controlled Study |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and Safety of Faecal Microbiota Transplantation for Acute Pancreatitis: A Randomised, Controlled Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and Safety of Faecal Microbiota Transplantation for Acute Pancreatitis: A Randomised, Controlled Study |
title_short | Efficacy and Safety of Faecal Microbiota Transplantation for Acute Pancreatitis: A Randomised, Controlled Study |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of faecal microbiota transplantation for acute pancreatitis: a randomised, controlled study |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8784600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35083238 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2021.772454 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dingling efficacyandsafetyoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationforacutepancreatitisarandomisedcontrolledstudy AT hecong efficacyandsafetyoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationforacutepancreatitisarandomisedcontrolledstudy AT lixueyang efficacyandsafetyoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationforacutepancreatitisarandomisedcontrolledstudy AT huangxin efficacyandsafetyoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationforacutepancreatitisarandomisedcontrolledstudy AT leiyupeng efficacyandsafetyoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationforacutepancreatitisarandomisedcontrolledstudy AT kehuajing efficacyandsafetyoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationforacutepancreatitisarandomisedcontrolledstudy AT chenhongyan efficacyandsafetyoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationforacutepancreatitisarandomisedcontrolledstudy AT yangqinyu efficacyandsafetyoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationforacutepancreatitisarandomisedcontrolledstudy AT caiyan efficacyandsafetyoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationforacutepancreatitisarandomisedcontrolledstudy AT liaoyuanhang efficacyandsafetyoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationforacutepancreatitisarandomisedcontrolledstudy AT hewenhua efficacyandsafetyoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationforacutepancreatitisarandomisedcontrolledstudy AT xialiang efficacyandsafetyoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationforacutepancreatitisarandomisedcontrolledstudy AT xionghuifang efficacyandsafetyoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationforacutepancreatitisarandomisedcontrolledstudy AT lunonghua efficacyandsafetyoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationforacutepancreatitisarandomisedcontrolledstudy AT zhuyin efficacyandsafetyoffaecalmicrobiotatransplantationforacutepancreatitisarandomisedcontrolledstudy |