Cargando…

Biophysical models of dispersal contribute to seascape genetic analyses

Dispersal is generally difficult to directly observe. Instead, dispersal is often inferred from genetic markers and biophysical modelling where a correspondence indicates that dispersal routes and barriers explain a significant part of population genetic differentiation. Biophysical models are used...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jahnke, Marlene, Jonsson, Per R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8784932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35067094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0024
_version_ 1784638848804847616
author Jahnke, Marlene
Jonsson, Per R.
author_facet Jahnke, Marlene
Jonsson, Per R.
author_sort Jahnke, Marlene
collection PubMed
description Dispersal is generally difficult to directly observe. Instead, dispersal is often inferred from genetic markers and biophysical modelling where a correspondence indicates that dispersal routes and barriers explain a significant part of population genetic differentiation. Biophysical models are used for wind-driven dispersal in terrestrial environments and for propagules drifting with ocean currents in the sea. In the ocean, such seascape genetic or seascape genomic studies provide promising tools in applied sciences, as actions within management and conservation rely on an understanding of population structure, genetic diversity and presence of local adaptations, all dependent on dispersal within the metapopulation. Here, we surveyed 87 studies that combine population genetics and biophysical models of dispersal. Our aim was to understand if biophysical dispersal models can generally explain genetic differentiation. Our analysis shows that genetic differentiation and lack of genetic differentiation can often be explained by dispersal, but the realism of the biophysical model, as well as local geomorphology and species biology also play a role. The review supports the use of a combination of both methods, and we discuss our findings in terms of recommendations for future studies and pinpoint areas where further development is necessary, particularly on how to compare both approaches. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Species’ ranges in the face of changing environments (part I)’.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8784932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87849322022-02-03 Biophysical models of dispersal contribute to seascape genetic analyses Jahnke, Marlene Jonsson, Per R. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Articles Dispersal is generally difficult to directly observe. Instead, dispersal is often inferred from genetic markers and biophysical modelling where a correspondence indicates that dispersal routes and barriers explain a significant part of population genetic differentiation. Biophysical models are used for wind-driven dispersal in terrestrial environments and for propagules drifting with ocean currents in the sea. In the ocean, such seascape genetic or seascape genomic studies provide promising tools in applied sciences, as actions within management and conservation rely on an understanding of population structure, genetic diversity and presence of local adaptations, all dependent on dispersal within the metapopulation. Here, we surveyed 87 studies that combine population genetics and biophysical models of dispersal. Our aim was to understand if biophysical dispersal models can generally explain genetic differentiation. Our analysis shows that genetic differentiation and lack of genetic differentiation can often be explained by dispersal, but the realism of the biophysical model, as well as local geomorphology and species biology also play a role. The review supports the use of a combination of both methods, and we discuss our findings in terms of recommendations for future studies and pinpoint areas where further development is necessary, particularly on how to compare both approaches. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Species’ ranges in the face of changing environments (part I)’. The Royal Society 2022-03-14 2022-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8784932/ /pubmed/35067094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0024 Text en © 2022 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Articles
Jahnke, Marlene
Jonsson, Per R.
Biophysical models of dispersal contribute to seascape genetic analyses
title Biophysical models of dispersal contribute to seascape genetic analyses
title_full Biophysical models of dispersal contribute to seascape genetic analyses
title_fullStr Biophysical models of dispersal contribute to seascape genetic analyses
title_full_unstemmed Biophysical models of dispersal contribute to seascape genetic analyses
title_short Biophysical models of dispersal contribute to seascape genetic analyses
title_sort biophysical models of dispersal contribute to seascape genetic analyses
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8784932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35067094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0024
work_keys_str_mv AT jahnkemarlene biophysicalmodelsofdispersalcontributetoseascapegeneticanalyses
AT jonssonperr biophysicalmodelsofdispersalcontributetoseascapegeneticanalyses