Cargando…

Prognostic Utility of the Gleason Grading System Revisions and Histopathological Factors Beyond Gleason Grade

BACKGROUND: The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) revised the Gleason system in 2005 and 2014. The impact of these changes on prostate cancer (PCa) prognostication remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if the ISUP 2014 Gleason score (GS) predicts PCa death better than the pre-20...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zelic, Renata, Giunchi, Francesca, Fridfeldt, Jonna, Carlsson, Jessica, Davidsson, Sabina, Lianas, Luca, Mascia, Cecilia, Zugna, Daniela, Molinaro, Luca, Vincent, Per Henrik, Zanetti, Gianluigi, Andrén, Ove, Richiardi, Lorenzo, Akre, Olof, Fiorentino, Michelangelo, Pettersson, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8784949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35082531
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S339140
_version_ 1784638852996005888
author Zelic, Renata
Giunchi, Francesca
Fridfeldt, Jonna
Carlsson, Jessica
Davidsson, Sabina
Lianas, Luca
Mascia, Cecilia
Zugna, Daniela
Molinaro, Luca
Vincent, Per Henrik
Zanetti, Gianluigi
Andrén, Ove
Richiardi, Lorenzo
Akre, Olof
Fiorentino, Michelangelo
Pettersson, Andreas
author_facet Zelic, Renata
Giunchi, Francesca
Fridfeldt, Jonna
Carlsson, Jessica
Davidsson, Sabina
Lianas, Luca
Mascia, Cecilia
Zugna, Daniela
Molinaro, Luca
Vincent, Per Henrik
Zanetti, Gianluigi
Andrén, Ove
Richiardi, Lorenzo
Akre, Olof
Fiorentino, Michelangelo
Pettersson, Andreas
author_sort Zelic, Renata
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) revised the Gleason system in 2005 and 2014. The impact of these changes on prostate cancer (PCa) prognostication remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if the ISUP 2014 Gleason score (GS) predicts PCa death better than the pre-2005 GS, and if additional histopathological information can further improve PCa death prediction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a case–control study nested among men in the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden diagnosed with non-metastatic PCa 1998–2015. We included 369 men who died from PCa (cases) and 369 men who did not (controls). Two uro-pathologists centrally re-reviewed biopsy ISUP 2014 Gleason grading, poorly formed glands, cribriform pattern, comedonecrosis, perineural invasion, intraductal, ductal and mucinous carcinoma, percentage Gleason 4, inflammation, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and post-atrophic hyperplasia. Pre-2005 GS was back-transformed using i) information on cribriform pattern and/or poorly formed glands and ii) the diagnostic GS from the registry. Models were developed using Firth logistic regression and compared in terms of discrimination (AUC). RESULTS: The ISUP 2014 GS (AUC = 0.808) performed better than the pre-2005 GS when back-transformed using only cribriform pattern (AUC = 0.785) or both cribriform and poorly formed glands (AUC = 0.792), but not when back-transformed using only poorly formed glands (AUC = 0.800). Similarly, the ISUP 2014 GS performed better than the diagnostic GS (AUC = 0.808 vs 0.781). Comedonecrosis (AUC = 0.811), HGPIN (AUC = 0.810) and number of cores with ≥50% cancer (AUC = 0.810) predicted PCa death independently of the ISUP 2014 GS. CONCLUSION: The Gleason Grading revisions have improved PCa death prediction, likely due to classifying cribriform patterns, rather than poorly formed glands, as Gleason 4. Comedonecrosis, HGPIN and number of cores with ≥50% cancer further improve PCa death discrimination slightly.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8784949
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87849492022-01-25 Prognostic Utility of the Gleason Grading System Revisions and Histopathological Factors Beyond Gleason Grade Zelic, Renata Giunchi, Francesca Fridfeldt, Jonna Carlsson, Jessica Davidsson, Sabina Lianas, Luca Mascia, Cecilia Zugna, Daniela Molinaro, Luca Vincent, Per Henrik Zanetti, Gianluigi Andrén, Ove Richiardi, Lorenzo Akre, Olof Fiorentino, Michelangelo Pettersson, Andreas Clin Epidemiol Original Research BACKGROUND: The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) revised the Gleason system in 2005 and 2014. The impact of these changes on prostate cancer (PCa) prognostication remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if the ISUP 2014 Gleason score (GS) predicts PCa death better than the pre-2005 GS, and if additional histopathological information can further improve PCa death prediction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a case–control study nested among men in the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden diagnosed with non-metastatic PCa 1998–2015. We included 369 men who died from PCa (cases) and 369 men who did not (controls). Two uro-pathologists centrally re-reviewed biopsy ISUP 2014 Gleason grading, poorly formed glands, cribriform pattern, comedonecrosis, perineural invasion, intraductal, ductal and mucinous carcinoma, percentage Gleason 4, inflammation, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and post-atrophic hyperplasia. Pre-2005 GS was back-transformed using i) information on cribriform pattern and/or poorly formed glands and ii) the diagnostic GS from the registry. Models were developed using Firth logistic regression and compared in terms of discrimination (AUC). RESULTS: The ISUP 2014 GS (AUC = 0.808) performed better than the pre-2005 GS when back-transformed using only cribriform pattern (AUC = 0.785) or both cribriform and poorly formed glands (AUC = 0.792), but not when back-transformed using only poorly formed glands (AUC = 0.800). Similarly, the ISUP 2014 GS performed better than the diagnostic GS (AUC = 0.808 vs 0.781). Comedonecrosis (AUC = 0.811), HGPIN (AUC = 0.810) and number of cores with ≥50% cancer (AUC = 0.810) predicted PCa death independently of the ISUP 2014 GS. CONCLUSION: The Gleason Grading revisions have improved PCa death prediction, likely due to classifying cribriform patterns, rather than poorly formed glands, as Gleason 4. Comedonecrosis, HGPIN and number of cores with ≥50% cancer further improve PCa death discrimination slightly. Dove 2022-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8784949/ /pubmed/35082531 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S339140 Text en © 2022 Zelic et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
Zelic, Renata
Giunchi, Francesca
Fridfeldt, Jonna
Carlsson, Jessica
Davidsson, Sabina
Lianas, Luca
Mascia, Cecilia
Zugna, Daniela
Molinaro, Luca
Vincent, Per Henrik
Zanetti, Gianluigi
Andrén, Ove
Richiardi, Lorenzo
Akre, Olof
Fiorentino, Michelangelo
Pettersson, Andreas
Prognostic Utility of the Gleason Grading System Revisions and Histopathological Factors Beyond Gleason Grade
title Prognostic Utility of the Gleason Grading System Revisions and Histopathological Factors Beyond Gleason Grade
title_full Prognostic Utility of the Gleason Grading System Revisions and Histopathological Factors Beyond Gleason Grade
title_fullStr Prognostic Utility of the Gleason Grading System Revisions and Histopathological Factors Beyond Gleason Grade
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Utility of the Gleason Grading System Revisions and Histopathological Factors Beyond Gleason Grade
title_short Prognostic Utility of the Gleason Grading System Revisions and Histopathological Factors Beyond Gleason Grade
title_sort prognostic utility of the gleason grading system revisions and histopathological factors beyond gleason grade
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8784949/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35082531
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S339140
work_keys_str_mv AT zelicrenata prognosticutilityofthegleasongradingsystemrevisionsandhistopathologicalfactorsbeyondgleasongrade
AT giunchifrancesca prognosticutilityofthegleasongradingsystemrevisionsandhistopathologicalfactorsbeyondgleasongrade
AT fridfeldtjonna prognosticutilityofthegleasongradingsystemrevisionsandhistopathologicalfactorsbeyondgleasongrade
AT carlssonjessica prognosticutilityofthegleasongradingsystemrevisionsandhistopathologicalfactorsbeyondgleasongrade
AT davidssonsabina prognosticutilityofthegleasongradingsystemrevisionsandhistopathologicalfactorsbeyondgleasongrade
AT lianasluca prognosticutilityofthegleasongradingsystemrevisionsandhistopathologicalfactorsbeyondgleasongrade
AT masciacecilia prognosticutilityofthegleasongradingsystemrevisionsandhistopathologicalfactorsbeyondgleasongrade
AT zugnadaniela prognosticutilityofthegleasongradingsystemrevisionsandhistopathologicalfactorsbeyondgleasongrade
AT molinaroluca prognosticutilityofthegleasongradingsystemrevisionsandhistopathologicalfactorsbeyondgleasongrade
AT vincentperhenrik prognosticutilityofthegleasongradingsystemrevisionsandhistopathologicalfactorsbeyondgleasongrade
AT zanettigianluigi prognosticutilityofthegleasongradingsystemrevisionsandhistopathologicalfactorsbeyondgleasongrade
AT andrenove prognosticutilityofthegleasongradingsystemrevisionsandhistopathologicalfactorsbeyondgleasongrade
AT richiardilorenzo prognosticutilityofthegleasongradingsystemrevisionsandhistopathologicalfactorsbeyondgleasongrade
AT akreolof prognosticutilityofthegleasongradingsystemrevisionsandhistopathologicalfactorsbeyondgleasongrade
AT fiorentinomichelangelo prognosticutilityofthegleasongradingsystemrevisionsandhistopathologicalfactorsbeyondgleasongrade
AT petterssonandreas prognosticutilityofthegleasongradingsystemrevisionsandhistopathologicalfactorsbeyondgleasongrade