Cargando…
Prognostic Utility of the Gleason Grading System Revisions and Histopathological Factors Beyond Gleason Grade
BACKGROUND: The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) revised the Gleason system in 2005 and 2014. The impact of these changes on prostate cancer (PCa) prognostication remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if the ISUP 2014 Gleason score (GS) predicts PCa death better than the pre-20...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8784949/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35082531 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S339140 |
_version_ | 1784638852996005888 |
---|---|
author | Zelic, Renata Giunchi, Francesca Fridfeldt, Jonna Carlsson, Jessica Davidsson, Sabina Lianas, Luca Mascia, Cecilia Zugna, Daniela Molinaro, Luca Vincent, Per Henrik Zanetti, Gianluigi Andrén, Ove Richiardi, Lorenzo Akre, Olof Fiorentino, Michelangelo Pettersson, Andreas |
author_facet | Zelic, Renata Giunchi, Francesca Fridfeldt, Jonna Carlsson, Jessica Davidsson, Sabina Lianas, Luca Mascia, Cecilia Zugna, Daniela Molinaro, Luca Vincent, Per Henrik Zanetti, Gianluigi Andrén, Ove Richiardi, Lorenzo Akre, Olof Fiorentino, Michelangelo Pettersson, Andreas |
author_sort | Zelic, Renata |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) revised the Gleason system in 2005 and 2014. The impact of these changes on prostate cancer (PCa) prognostication remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if the ISUP 2014 Gleason score (GS) predicts PCa death better than the pre-2005 GS, and if additional histopathological information can further improve PCa death prediction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a case–control study nested among men in the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden diagnosed with non-metastatic PCa 1998–2015. We included 369 men who died from PCa (cases) and 369 men who did not (controls). Two uro-pathologists centrally re-reviewed biopsy ISUP 2014 Gleason grading, poorly formed glands, cribriform pattern, comedonecrosis, perineural invasion, intraductal, ductal and mucinous carcinoma, percentage Gleason 4, inflammation, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and post-atrophic hyperplasia. Pre-2005 GS was back-transformed using i) information on cribriform pattern and/or poorly formed glands and ii) the diagnostic GS from the registry. Models were developed using Firth logistic regression and compared in terms of discrimination (AUC). RESULTS: The ISUP 2014 GS (AUC = 0.808) performed better than the pre-2005 GS when back-transformed using only cribriform pattern (AUC = 0.785) or both cribriform and poorly formed glands (AUC = 0.792), but not when back-transformed using only poorly formed glands (AUC = 0.800). Similarly, the ISUP 2014 GS performed better than the diagnostic GS (AUC = 0.808 vs 0.781). Comedonecrosis (AUC = 0.811), HGPIN (AUC = 0.810) and number of cores with ≥50% cancer (AUC = 0.810) predicted PCa death independently of the ISUP 2014 GS. CONCLUSION: The Gleason Grading revisions have improved PCa death prediction, likely due to classifying cribriform patterns, rather than poorly formed glands, as Gleason 4. Comedonecrosis, HGPIN and number of cores with ≥50% cancer further improve PCa death discrimination slightly. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8784949 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87849492022-01-25 Prognostic Utility of the Gleason Grading System Revisions and Histopathological Factors Beyond Gleason Grade Zelic, Renata Giunchi, Francesca Fridfeldt, Jonna Carlsson, Jessica Davidsson, Sabina Lianas, Luca Mascia, Cecilia Zugna, Daniela Molinaro, Luca Vincent, Per Henrik Zanetti, Gianluigi Andrén, Ove Richiardi, Lorenzo Akre, Olof Fiorentino, Michelangelo Pettersson, Andreas Clin Epidemiol Original Research BACKGROUND: The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) revised the Gleason system in 2005 and 2014. The impact of these changes on prostate cancer (PCa) prognostication remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if the ISUP 2014 Gleason score (GS) predicts PCa death better than the pre-2005 GS, and if additional histopathological information can further improve PCa death prediction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a case–control study nested among men in the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden diagnosed with non-metastatic PCa 1998–2015. We included 369 men who died from PCa (cases) and 369 men who did not (controls). Two uro-pathologists centrally re-reviewed biopsy ISUP 2014 Gleason grading, poorly formed glands, cribriform pattern, comedonecrosis, perineural invasion, intraductal, ductal and mucinous carcinoma, percentage Gleason 4, inflammation, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (HGPIN) and post-atrophic hyperplasia. Pre-2005 GS was back-transformed using i) information on cribriform pattern and/or poorly formed glands and ii) the diagnostic GS from the registry. Models were developed using Firth logistic regression and compared in terms of discrimination (AUC). RESULTS: The ISUP 2014 GS (AUC = 0.808) performed better than the pre-2005 GS when back-transformed using only cribriform pattern (AUC = 0.785) or both cribriform and poorly formed glands (AUC = 0.792), but not when back-transformed using only poorly formed glands (AUC = 0.800). Similarly, the ISUP 2014 GS performed better than the diagnostic GS (AUC = 0.808 vs 0.781). Comedonecrosis (AUC = 0.811), HGPIN (AUC = 0.810) and number of cores with ≥50% cancer (AUC = 0.810) predicted PCa death independently of the ISUP 2014 GS. CONCLUSION: The Gleason Grading revisions have improved PCa death prediction, likely due to classifying cribriform patterns, rather than poorly formed glands, as Gleason 4. Comedonecrosis, HGPIN and number of cores with ≥50% cancer further improve PCa death discrimination slightly. Dove 2022-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8784949/ /pubmed/35082531 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S339140 Text en © 2022 Zelic et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) ). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Zelic, Renata Giunchi, Francesca Fridfeldt, Jonna Carlsson, Jessica Davidsson, Sabina Lianas, Luca Mascia, Cecilia Zugna, Daniela Molinaro, Luca Vincent, Per Henrik Zanetti, Gianluigi Andrén, Ove Richiardi, Lorenzo Akre, Olof Fiorentino, Michelangelo Pettersson, Andreas Prognostic Utility of the Gleason Grading System Revisions and Histopathological Factors Beyond Gleason Grade |
title | Prognostic Utility of the Gleason Grading System Revisions and Histopathological Factors Beyond Gleason Grade |
title_full | Prognostic Utility of the Gleason Grading System Revisions and Histopathological Factors Beyond Gleason Grade |
title_fullStr | Prognostic Utility of the Gleason Grading System Revisions and Histopathological Factors Beyond Gleason Grade |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic Utility of the Gleason Grading System Revisions and Histopathological Factors Beyond Gleason Grade |
title_short | Prognostic Utility of the Gleason Grading System Revisions and Histopathological Factors Beyond Gleason Grade |
title_sort | prognostic utility of the gleason grading system revisions and histopathological factors beyond gleason grade |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8784949/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35082531 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S339140 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zelicrenata prognosticutilityofthegleasongradingsystemrevisionsandhistopathologicalfactorsbeyondgleasongrade AT giunchifrancesca prognosticutilityofthegleasongradingsystemrevisionsandhistopathologicalfactorsbeyondgleasongrade AT fridfeldtjonna prognosticutilityofthegleasongradingsystemrevisionsandhistopathologicalfactorsbeyondgleasongrade AT carlssonjessica prognosticutilityofthegleasongradingsystemrevisionsandhistopathologicalfactorsbeyondgleasongrade AT davidssonsabina prognosticutilityofthegleasongradingsystemrevisionsandhistopathologicalfactorsbeyondgleasongrade AT lianasluca prognosticutilityofthegleasongradingsystemrevisionsandhistopathologicalfactorsbeyondgleasongrade AT masciacecilia prognosticutilityofthegleasongradingsystemrevisionsandhistopathologicalfactorsbeyondgleasongrade AT zugnadaniela prognosticutilityofthegleasongradingsystemrevisionsandhistopathologicalfactorsbeyondgleasongrade AT molinaroluca prognosticutilityofthegleasongradingsystemrevisionsandhistopathologicalfactorsbeyondgleasongrade AT vincentperhenrik prognosticutilityofthegleasongradingsystemrevisionsandhistopathologicalfactorsbeyondgleasongrade AT zanettigianluigi prognosticutilityofthegleasongradingsystemrevisionsandhistopathologicalfactorsbeyondgleasongrade AT andrenove prognosticutilityofthegleasongradingsystemrevisionsandhistopathologicalfactorsbeyondgleasongrade AT richiardilorenzo prognosticutilityofthegleasongradingsystemrevisionsandhistopathologicalfactorsbeyondgleasongrade AT akreolof prognosticutilityofthegleasongradingsystemrevisionsandhistopathologicalfactorsbeyondgleasongrade AT fiorentinomichelangelo prognosticutilityofthegleasongradingsystemrevisionsandhistopathologicalfactorsbeyondgleasongrade AT petterssonandreas prognosticutilityofthegleasongradingsystemrevisionsandhistopathologicalfactorsbeyondgleasongrade |