Cargando…

Value of repeated imaging in patients with a stroke who are transferred for endovascular treatment

BACKGROUND: Patients with a stroke who are transferred to a comprehensive stroke center for endovascular treatment (EVT) often undergo repeated neuroimaging prior to EVT. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the yield of repeating imaging and its effect on treatment times. METHODS: We included adult patients with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Meenen, Laura C C, Arrarte Terreros, Nerea, Groot, Adrien E, Kappelhof, Manon, Beenen, Ludo F M, Marquering, Henk A, Emmer, Bart J, Roos, Yvo B W E M, Majoie, Charles B L M, Coutinho, Jonathan M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8784993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33685983
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-017050
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Patients with a stroke who are transferred to a comprehensive stroke center for endovascular treatment (EVT) often undergo repeated neuroimaging prior to EVT. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the yield of repeating imaging and its effect on treatment times. METHODS: We included adult patients with a large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke who were referred to our hospital for EVT by primary stroke centers (2016–2019). We excluded patients who underwent repeated imaging because primary imaging was unavailable, incomplete, or of insufficient quality. Outcomes included treatment times and repeated imaging findings. RESULTS: Of 677 transferred LVO stroke, 551 were included. Imaging was repeated in 165/551 patients (30%), mostly because of clinical improvement (86/165 (52%)) or deterioration (40/165 (24%)). Patients who underwent repeated imaging had higher door-to-groin-times than patients without repeated imaging (median 43 vs 27 min, adjusted time difference: 20 min, 95% CI 15 to 25). Among patients who underwent repeated imaging because of clinical improvement, the LVO had resolved in 50/86 (58%). In patients with clinical deterioration, repeated imaging led to refrainment from EVT in 3/40 (8%). No symptomatic intracranial hemorrhages (sICH) were identified. Ultimately, 75/165 (45%) of patients with repeated imaging underwent EVT compared with 326/386 (84%) of patients without repeated imaging (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Neuroimaging was repeated in 30% of patients with an LVO stroke and resulted in a median treatment delay of 20 minutes. In patients with clinical deterioration, no sICH were detected and repeated imaging rarely changed the indication for EVT. However, in more than half of patients with clinical improvement, the LVO had resolved, resulting in refrainment from EVT.