Cargando…

The impact of loneliness and social isolation on health state utility values: a systematic literature review

BACKGROUND: Loneliness and social isolation are recognised as social problems and denote a significant health burden. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic literature review to explore the health state utility values (HSUVs) associated with loneliness and/or social isolation. METHOD: Pee...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Majmudar, Ishani K., Mihalopoulos, Cathrine, Brijnath, Bianca, Lim, Michelle H., Hall, Natasha Yvonne, Engel, Lidia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8785005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35072904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-03063-1
_version_ 1784638866728157184
author Majmudar, Ishani K.
Mihalopoulos, Cathrine
Brijnath, Bianca
Lim, Michelle H.
Hall, Natasha Yvonne
Engel, Lidia
author_facet Majmudar, Ishani K.
Mihalopoulos, Cathrine
Brijnath, Bianca
Lim, Michelle H.
Hall, Natasha Yvonne
Engel, Lidia
author_sort Majmudar, Ishani K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Loneliness and social isolation are recognised as social problems and denote a significant health burden. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic literature review to explore the health state utility values (HSUVs) associated with loneliness and/or social isolation. METHOD: Peer-reviewed journals published in English language that reported both HSUVs along with loneliness and/or social isolation scores were identified through five databases. No restrictions were made relating to the population, study design or utility estimation method used. RESULTS: In total, 19 papers were included; 12 included a measure of loneliness, four studies included a measure of social isolation and three studies considered both loneliness and social isolation. All studies focused on individuals with pre-existing health conditions—where the EQ-5D-3L instrument was most frequently used to assess HSUVs. HSUVs ranged from 0.5 to 0.95 in those who reported not being lonely, 0.42 to 0.97 in those who experienced some level of loneliness, 0.3 to 0.87 in those who were socially isolated and 0.63 to 0.94 in those who were not socially isolated. CONCLUSION: There was significant variation in HSUVs complicated by the presence of co-morbidities, population heterogeneity, variations in methods used to derive utility scores and differences in the measurement of loneliness and/or social isolation. Nevertheless, the lower HSUVs observed should be considered to significantly impact quality of life, though we also note the need for further research to explore the unique impact of loneliness and social isolation on HSUVs that can be used in the future economic evaluations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11136-021-03063-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8785005
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87850052022-01-24 The impact of loneliness and social isolation on health state utility values: a systematic literature review Majmudar, Ishani K. Mihalopoulos, Cathrine Brijnath, Bianca Lim, Michelle H. Hall, Natasha Yvonne Engel, Lidia Qual Life Res Article BACKGROUND: Loneliness and social isolation are recognised as social problems and denote a significant health burden. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic literature review to explore the health state utility values (HSUVs) associated with loneliness and/or social isolation. METHOD: Peer-reviewed journals published in English language that reported both HSUVs along with loneliness and/or social isolation scores were identified through five databases. No restrictions were made relating to the population, study design or utility estimation method used. RESULTS: In total, 19 papers were included; 12 included a measure of loneliness, four studies included a measure of social isolation and three studies considered both loneliness and social isolation. All studies focused on individuals with pre-existing health conditions—where the EQ-5D-3L instrument was most frequently used to assess HSUVs. HSUVs ranged from 0.5 to 0.95 in those who reported not being lonely, 0.42 to 0.97 in those who experienced some level of loneliness, 0.3 to 0.87 in those who were socially isolated and 0.63 to 0.94 in those who were not socially isolated. CONCLUSION: There was significant variation in HSUVs complicated by the presence of co-morbidities, population heterogeneity, variations in methods used to derive utility scores and differences in the measurement of loneliness and/or social isolation. Nevertheless, the lower HSUVs observed should be considered to significantly impact quality of life, though we also note the need for further research to explore the unique impact of loneliness and social isolation on HSUVs that can be used in the future economic evaluations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11136-021-03063-1. Springer International Publishing 2022-01-24 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8785005/ /pubmed/35072904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-03063-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Majmudar, Ishani K.
Mihalopoulos, Cathrine
Brijnath, Bianca
Lim, Michelle H.
Hall, Natasha Yvonne
Engel, Lidia
The impact of loneliness and social isolation on health state utility values: a systematic literature review
title The impact of loneliness and social isolation on health state utility values: a systematic literature review
title_full The impact of loneliness and social isolation on health state utility values: a systematic literature review
title_fullStr The impact of loneliness and social isolation on health state utility values: a systematic literature review
title_full_unstemmed The impact of loneliness and social isolation on health state utility values: a systematic literature review
title_short The impact of loneliness and social isolation on health state utility values: a systematic literature review
title_sort impact of loneliness and social isolation on health state utility values: a systematic literature review
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8785005/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35072904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-03063-1
work_keys_str_mv AT majmudarishanik theimpactoflonelinessandsocialisolationonhealthstateutilityvaluesasystematicliteraturereview
AT mihalopouloscathrine theimpactoflonelinessandsocialisolationonhealthstateutilityvaluesasystematicliteraturereview
AT brijnathbianca theimpactoflonelinessandsocialisolationonhealthstateutilityvaluesasystematicliteraturereview
AT limmichelleh theimpactoflonelinessandsocialisolationonhealthstateutilityvaluesasystematicliteraturereview
AT hallnatashayvonne theimpactoflonelinessandsocialisolationonhealthstateutilityvaluesasystematicliteraturereview
AT engellidia theimpactoflonelinessandsocialisolationonhealthstateutilityvaluesasystematicliteraturereview
AT majmudarishanik impactoflonelinessandsocialisolationonhealthstateutilityvaluesasystematicliteraturereview
AT mihalopouloscathrine impactoflonelinessandsocialisolationonhealthstateutilityvaluesasystematicliteraturereview
AT brijnathbianca impactoflonelinessandsocialisolationonhealthstateutilityvaluesasystematicliteraturereview
AT limmichelleh impactoflonelinessandsocialisolationonhealthstateutilityvaluesasystematicliteraturereview
AT hallnatashayvonne impactoflonelinessandsocialisolationonhealthstateutilityvaluesasystematicliteraturereview
AT engellidia impactoflonelinessandsocialisolationonhealthstateutilityvaluesasystematicliteraturereview