Cargando…
The impact of loneliness and social isolation on health state utility values: a systematic literature review
BACKGROUND: Loneliness and social isolation are recognised as social problems and denote a significant health burden. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic literature review to explore the health state utility values (HSUVs) associated with loneliness and/or social isolation. METHOD: Pee...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8785005/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35072904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-03063-1 |
_version_ | 1784638866728157184 |
---|---|
author | Majmudar, Ishani K. Mihalopoulos, Cathrine Brijnath, Bianca Lim, Michelle H. Hall, Natasha Yvonne Engel, Lidia |
author_facet | Majmudar, Ishani K. Mihalopoulos, Cathrine Brijnath, Bianca Lim, Michelle H. Hall, Natasha Yvonne Engel, Lidia |
author_sort | Majmudar, Ishani K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Loneliness and social isolation are recognised as social problems and denote a significant health burden. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic literature review to explore the health state utility values (HSUVs) associated with loneliness and/or social isolation. METHOD: Peer-reviewed journals published in English language that reported both HSUVs along with loneliness and/or social isolation scores were identified through five databases. No restrictions were made relating to the population, study design or utility estimation method used. RESULTS: In total, 19 papers were included; 12 included a measure of loneliness, four studies included a measure of social isolation and three studies considered both loneliness and social isolation. All studies focused on individuals with pre-existing health conditions—where the EQ-5D-3L instrument was most frequently used to assess HSUVs. HSUVs ranged from 0.5 to 0.95 in those who reported not being lonely, 0.42 to 0.97 in those who experienced some level of loneliness, 0.3 to 0.87 in those who were socially isolated and 0.63 to 0.94 in those who were not socially isolated. CONCLUSION: There was significant variation in HSUVs complicated by the presence of co-morbidities, population heterogeneity, variations in methods used to derive utility scores and differences in the measurement of loneliness and/or social isolation. Nevertheless, the lower HSUVs observed should be considered to significantly impact quality of life, though we also note the need for further research to explore the unique impact of loneliness and social isolation on HSUVs that can be used in the future economic evaluations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11136-021-03063-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8785005 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87850052022-01-24 The impact of loneliness and social isolation on health state utility values: a systematic literature review Majmudar, Ishani K. Mihalopoulos, Cathrine Brijnath, Bianca Lim, Michelle H. Hall, Natasha Yvonne Engel, Lidia Qual Life Res Article BACKGROUND: Loneliness and social isolation are recognised as social problems and denote a significant health burden. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic literature review to explore the health state utility values (HSUVs) associated with loneliness and/or social isolation. METHOD: Peer-reviewed journals published in English language that reported both HSUVs along with loneliness and/or social isolation scores were identified through five databases. No restrictions were made relating to the population, study design or utility estimation method used. RESULTS: In total, 19 papers were included; 12 included a measure of loneliness, four studies included a measure of social isolation and three studies considered both loneliness and social isolation. All studies focused on individuals with pre-existing health conditions—where the EQ-5D-3L instrument was most frequently used to assess HSUVs. HSUVs ranged from 0.5 to 0.95 in those who reported not being lonely, 0.42 to 0.97 in those who experienced some level of loneliness, 0.3 to 0.87 in those who were socially isolated and 0.63 to 0.94 in those who were not socially isolated. CONCLUSION: There was significant variation in HSUVs complicated by the presence of co-morbidities, population heterogeneity, variations in methods used to derive utility scores and differences in the measurement of loneliness and/or social isolation. Nevertheless, the lower HSUVs observed should be considered to significantly impact quality of life, though we also note the need for further research to explore the unique impact of loneliness and social isolation on HSUVs that can be used in the future economic evaluations. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11136-021-03063-1. Springer International Publishing 2022-01-24 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8785005/ /pubmed/35072904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-03063-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Majmudar, Ishani K. Mihalopoulos, Cathrine Brijnath, Bianca Lim, Michelle H. Hall, Natasha Yvonne Engel, Lidia The impact of loneliness and social isolation on health state utility values: a systematic literature review |
title | The impact of loneliness and social isolation on health state utility values: a systematic literature review |
title_full | The impact of loneliness and social isolation on health state utility values: a systematic literature review |
title_fullStr | The impact of loneliness and social isolation on health state utility values: a systematic literature review |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of loneliness and social isolation on health state utility values: a systematic literature review |
title_short | The impact of loneliness and social isolation on health state utility values: a systematic literature review |
title_sort | impact of loneliness and social isolation on health state utility values: a systematic literature review |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8785005/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35072904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-03063-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT majmudarishanik theimpactoflonelinessandsocialisolationonhealthstateutilityvaluesasystematicliteraturereview AT mihalopouloscathrine theimpactoflonelinessandsocialisolationonhealthstateutilityvaluesasystematicliteraturereview AT brijnathbianca theimpactoflonelinessandsocialisolationonhealthstateutilityvaluesasystematicliteraturereview AT limmichelleh theimpactoflonelinessandsocialisolationonhealthstateutilityvaluesasystematicliteraturereview AT hallnatashayvonne theimpactoflonelinessandsocialisolationonhealthstateutilityvaluesasystematicliteraturereview AT engellidia theimpactoflonelinessandsocialisolationonhealthstateutilityvaluesasystematicliteraturereview AT majmudarishanik impactoflonelinessandsocialisolationonhealthstateutilityvaluesasystematicliteraturereview AT mihalopouloscathrine impactoflonelinessandsocialisolationonhealthstateutilityvaluesasystematicliteraturereview AT brijnathbianca impactoflonelinessandsocialisolationonhealthstateutilityvaluesasystematicliteraturereview AT limmichelleh impactoflonelinessandsocialisolationonhealthstateutilityvaluesasystematicliteraturereview AT hallnatashayvonne impactoflonelinessandsocialisolationonhealthstateutilityvaluesasystematicliteraturereview AT engellidia impactoflonelinessandsocialisolationonhealthstateutilityvaluesasystematicliteraturereview |