Cargando…

The MITRE trial protocol: a study to evaluate the microbiome as a biomarker of efficacy and toxicity in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy

BACKGROUND: The gut microbiome is implicated as a marker of response to  immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) based on preclinical mouse models and preliminary observations in limited patient series. Furthermore, early studies suggest faecal microbial transfer may have therapeutic potential, convertin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thompson, Nicola A., Stewart, Grant D., Welsh, Sarah J., Doherty, Gary J., Robinson, Matthew J., Neville, B. Anne, Vervier, Kevin, Harris, Simon R., Adams, David J., Dalchau, Katy, Bruce, David, Demiris, Nikolaos, Lawley, Trevor D., Corrie, Pippa G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8785032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35073853
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-09156-x
_version_ 1784638874632323072
author Thompson, Nicola A.
Stewart, Grant D.
Welsh, Sarah J.
Doherty, Gary J.
Robinson, Matthew J.
Neville, B. Anne
Vervier, Kevin
Harris, Simon R.
Adams, David J.
Dalchau, Katy
Bruce, David
Demiris, Nikolaos
Lawley, Trevor D.
Corrie, Pippa G.
author_facet Thompson, Nicola A.
Stewart, Grant D.
Welsh, Sarah J.
Doherty, Gary J.
Robinson, Matthew J.
Neville, B. Anne
Vervier, Kevin
Harris, Simon R.
Adams, David J.
Dalchau, Katy
Bruce, David
Demiris, Nikolaos
Lawley, Trevor D.
Corrie, Pippa G.
author_sort Thompson, Nicola A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The gut microbiome is implicated as a marker of response to  immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) based on preclinical mouse models and preliminary observations in limited patient series. Furthermore, early studies suggest faecal microbial transfer may have therapeutic potential, converting ICI non-responders into responders. So far, identification of specific responsible bacterial taxa has been inconsistent, which limits future application. The MITRE study will explore and validate a microbiome signature in a larger scale prospective study across several different cancer types. METHODS: Melanoma, renal cancer and non-small cell lung cancer patients who are planned to receive standard immune checkpoint inhibitors are being recruited to the MITRE study. Longitudinal stool samples are collected prior to treatment, then at 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months during treatment, or at disease progression/recurrence (whichever is sooner), as well as after a severe (≥grade 3 CTCAE v5.0) immune-related adverse event. Additionally, whole blood, plasma, buffy coat, RNA and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) is collected at similar time points and will be used for exploratory analyses. Archival tumour tissue, tumour biopsies at progression/relapse, as well as any biopsies from body organs collected after a severe toxicity are collected. The primary outcome measure is the ability of the microbiome signature to predict 1 year progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with advanced disease. Secondary outcomes include microbiome correlations with toxicity and other efficacy end-points. Biosamples will be used to explore immunological and genomic correlates. A sub-study will evaluate both COVID-19 antigen and antibody associations with the microbiome. DISCUSSION: There is an urgent need to identify biomarkers that are predictive of treatment response, resistance and toxicity to immunotherapy. The data generated from this study will both help inform patient selection for these drugs and provide information that may allow therapeutic manipulation of the microbiome to improve future patient outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04107168, ClinicalTrials.gov, registered 09/27/2019. Protocol V3.2 (16/04/2021). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-09156-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8785032
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87850322022-01-24 The MITRE trial protocol: a study to evaluate the microbiome as a biomarker of efficacy and toxicity in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy Thompson, Nicola A. Stewart, Grant D. Welsh, Sarah J. Doherty, Gary J. Robinson, Matthew J. Neville, B. Anne Vervier, Kevin Harris, Simon R. Adams, David J. Dalchau, Katy Bruce, David Demiris, Nikolaos Lawley, Trevor D. Corrie, Pippa G. BMC Cancer Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The gut microbiome is implicated as a marker of response to  immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) based on preclinical mouse models and preliminary observations in limited patient series. Furthermore, early studies suggest faecal microbial transfer may have therapeutic potential, converting ICI non-responders into responders. So far, identification of specific responsible bacterial taxa has been inconsistent, which limits future application. The MITRE study will explore and validate a microbiome signature in a larger scale prospective study across several different cancer types. METHODS: Melanoma, renal cancer and non-small cell lung cancer patients who are planned to receive standard immune checkpoint inhibitors are being recruited to the MITRE study. Longitudinal stool samples are collected prior to treatment, then at 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months during treatment, or at disease progression/recurrence (whichever is sooner), as well as after a severe (≥grade 3 CTCAE v5.0) immune-related adverse event. Additionally, whole blood, plasma, buffy coat, RNA and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) is collected at similar time points and will be used for exploratory analyses. Archival tumour tissue, tumour biopsies at progression/relapse, as well as any biopsies from body organs collected after a severe toxicity are collected. The primary outcome measure is the ability of the microbiome signature to predict 1 year progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with advanced disease. Secondary outcomes include microbiome correlations with toxicity and other efficacy end-points. Biosamples will be used to explore immunological and genomic correlates. A sub-study will evaluate both COVID-19 antigen and antibody associations with the microbiome. DISCUSSION: There is an urgent need to identify biomarkers that are predictive of treatment response, resistance and toxicity to immunotherapy. The data generated from this study will both help inform patient selection for these drugs and provide information that may allow therapeutic manipulation of the microbiome to improve future patient outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04107168, ClinicalTrials.gov, registered 09/27/2019. Protocol V3.2 (16/04/2021). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-09156-x. BioMed Central 2022-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8785032/ /pubmed/35073853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-09156-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Thompson, Nicola A.
Stewart, Grant D.
Welsh, Sarah J.
Doherty, Gary J.
Robinson, Matthew J.
Neville, B. Anne
Vervier, Kevin
Harris, Simon R.
Adams, David J.
Dalchau, Katy
Bruce, David
Demiris, Nikolaos
Lawley, Trevor D.
Corrie, Pippa G.
The MITRE trial protocol: a study to evaluate the microbiome as a biomarker of efficacy and toxicity in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy
title The MITRE trial protocol: a study to evaluate the microbiome as a biomarker of efficacy and toxicity in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy
title_full The MITRE trial protocol: a study to evaluate the microbiome as a biomarker of efficacy and toxicity in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy
title_fullStr The MITRE trial protocol: a study to evaluate the microbiome as a biomarker of efficacy and toxicity in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy
title_full_unstemmed The MITRE trial protocol: a study to evaluate the microbiome as a biomarker of efficacy and toxicity in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy
title_short The MITRE trial protocol: a study to evaluate the microbiome as a biomarker of efficacy and toxicity in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy
title_sort mitre trial protocol: a study to evaluate the microbiome as a biomarker of efficacy and toxicity in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8785032/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35073853
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-09156-x
work_keys_str_mv AT thompsonnicolaa themitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy
AT stewartgrantd themitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy
AT welshsarahj themitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy
AT dohertygaryj themitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy
AT robinsonmatthewj themitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy
AT nevillebanne themitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy
AT vervierkevin themitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy
AT harrissimonr themitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy
AT adamsdavidj themitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy
AT dalchaukaty themitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy
AT brucedavid themitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy
AT demirisnikolaos themitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy
AT lawleytrevord themitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy
AT corriepippag themitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy
AT thompsonnicolaa mitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy
AT stewartgrantd mitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy
AT welshsarahj mitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy
AT dohertygaryj mitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy
AT robinsonmatthewj mitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy
AT nevillebanne mitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy
AT vervierkevin mitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy
AT harrissimonr mitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy
AT adamsdavidj mitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy
AT dalchaukaty mitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy
AT brucedavid mitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy
AT demirisnikolaos mitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy
AT lawleytrevord mitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy
AT corriepippag mitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy