Cargando…
The MITRE trial protocol: a study to evaluate the microbiome as a biomarker of efficacy and toxicity in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy
BACKGROUND: The gut microbiome is implicated as a marker of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) based on preclinical mouse models and preliminary observations in limited patient series. Furthermore, early studies suggest faecal microbial transfer may have therapeutic potential, convertin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8785032/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35073853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-09156-x |
_version_ | 1784638874632323072 |
---|---|
author | Thompson, Nicola A. Stewart, Grant D. Welsh, Sarah J. Doherty, Gary J. Robinson, Matthew J. Neville, B. Anne Vervier, Kevin Harris, Simon R. Adams, David J. Dalchau, Katy Bruce, David Demiris, Nikolaos Lawley, Trevor D. Corrie, Pippa G. |
author_facet | Thompson, Nicola A. Stewart, Grant D. Welsh, Sarah J. Doherty, Gary J. Robinson, Matthew J. Neville, B. Anne Vervier, Kevin Harris, Simon R. Adams, David J. Dalchau, Katy Bruce, David Demiris, Nikolaos Lawley, Trevor D. Corrie, Pippa G. |
author_sort | Thompson, Nicola A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The gut microbiome is implicated as a marker of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) based on preclinical mouse models and preliminary observations in limited patient series. Furthermore, early studies suggest faecal microbial transfer may have therapeutic potential, converting ICI non-responders into responders. So far, identification of specific responsible bacterial taxa has been inconsistent, which limits future application. The MITRE study will explore and validate a microbiome signature in a larger scale prospective study across several different cancer types. METHODS: Melanoma, renal cancer and non-small cell lung cancer patients who are planned to receive standard immune checkpoint inhibitors are being recruited to the MITRE study. Longitudinal stool samples are collected prior to treatment, then at 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months during treatment, or at disease progression/recurrence (whichever is sooner), as well as after a severe (≥grade 3 CTCAE v5.0) immune-related adverse event. Additionally, whole blood, plasma, buffy coat, RNA and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) is collected at similar time points and will be used for exploratory analyses. Archival tumour tissue, tumour biopsies at progression/relapse, as well as any biopsies from body organs collected after a severe toxicity are collected. The primary outcome measure is the ability of the microbiome signature to predict 1 year progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with advanced disease. Secondary outcomes include microbiome correlations with toxicity and other efficacy end-points. Biosamples will be used to explore immunological and genomic correlates. A sub-study will evaluate both COVID-19 antigen and antibody associations with the microbiome. DISCUSSION: There is an urgent need to identify biomarkers that are predictive of treatment response, resistance and toxicity to immunotherapy. The data generated from this study will both help inform patient selection for these drugs and provide information that may allow therapeutic manipulation of the microbiome to improve future patient outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04107168, ClinicalTrials.gov, registered 09/27/2019. Protocol V3.2 (16/04/2021). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-09156-x. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8785032 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87850322022-01-24 The MITRE trial protocol: a study to evaluate the microbiome as a biomarker of efficacy and toxicity in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy Thompson, Nicola A. Stewart, Grant D. Welsh, Sarah J. Doherty, Gary J. Robinson, Matthew J. Neville, B. Anne Vervier, Kevin Harris, Simon R. Adams, David J. Dalchau, Katy Bruce, David Demiris, Nikolaos Lawley, Trevor D. Corrie, Pippa G. BMC Cancer Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The gut microbiome is implicated as a marker of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) based on preclinical mouse models and preliminary observations in limited patient series. Furthermore, early studies suggest faecal microbial transfer may have therapeutic potential, converting ICI non-responders into responders. So far, identification of specific responsible bacterial taxa has been inconsistent, which limits future application. The MITRE study will explore and validate a microbiome signature in a larger scale prospective study across several different cancer types. METHODS: Melanoma, renal cancer and non-small cell lung cancer patients who are planned to receive standard immune checkpoint inhibitors are being recruited to the MITRE study. Longitudinal stool samples are collected prior to treatment, then at 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months during treatment, or at disease progression/recurrence (whichever is sooner), as well as after a severe (≥grade 3 CTCAE v5.0) immune-related adverse event. Additionally, whole blood, plasma, buffy coat, RNA and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) is collected at similar time points and will be used for exploratory analyses. Archival tumour tissue, tumour biopsies at progression/relapse, as well as any biopsies from body organs collected after a severe toxicity are collected. The primary outcome measure is the ability of the microbiome signature to predict 1 year progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with advanced disease. Secondary outcomes include microbiome correlations with toxicity and other efficacy end-points. Biosamples will be used to explore immunological and genomic correlates. A sub-study will evaluate both COVID-19 antigen and antibody associations with the microbiome. DISCUSSION: There is an urgent need to identify biomarkers that are predictive of treatment response, resistance and toxicity to immunotherapy. The data generated from this study will both help inform patient selection for these drugs and provide information that may allow therapeutic manipulation of the microbiome to improve future patient outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04107168, ClinicalTrials.gov, registered 09/27/2019. Protocol V3.2 (16/04/2021). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-09156-x. BioMed Central 2022-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8785032/ /pubmed/35073853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-09156-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Thompson, Nicola A. Stewart, Grant D. Welsh, Sarah J. Doherty, Gary J. Robinson, Matthew J. Neville, B. Anne Vervier, Kevin Harris, Simon R. Adams, David J. Dalchau, Katy Bruce, David Demiris, Nikolaos Lawley, Trevor D. Corrie, Pippa G. The MITRE trial protocol: a study to evaluate the microbiome as a biomarker of efficacy and toxicity in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy |
title | The MITRE trial protocol: a study to evaluate the microbiome as a biomarker of efficacy and toxicity in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy |
title_full | The MITRE trial protocol: a study to evaluate the microbiome as a biomarker of efficacy and toxicity in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy |
title_fullStr | The MITRE trial protocol: a study to evaluate the microbiome as a biomarker of efficacy and toxicity in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | The MITRE trial protocol: a study to evaluate the microbiome as a biomarker of efficacy and toxicity in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy |
title_short | The MITRE trial protocol: a study to evaluate the microbiome as a biomarker of efficacy and toxicity in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy |
title_sort | mitre trial protocol: a study to evaluate the microbiome as a biomarker of efficacy and toxicity in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8785032/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35073853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-09156-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thompsonnicolaa themitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy AT stewartgrantd themitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy AT welshsarahj themitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy AT dohertygaryj themitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy AT robinsonmatthewj themitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy AT nevillebanne themitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy AT vervierkevin themitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy AT harrissimonr themitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy AT adamsdavidj themitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy AT dalchaukaty themitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy AT brucedavid themitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy AT demirisnikolaos themitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy AT lawleytrevord themitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy AT corriepippag themitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy AT thompsonnicolaa mitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy AT stewartgrantd mitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy AT welshsarahj mitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy AT dohertygaryj mitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy AT robinsonmatthewj mitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy AT nevillebanne mitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy AT vervierkevin mitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy AT harrissimonr mitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy AT adamsdavidj mitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy AT dalchaukaty mitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy AT brucedavid mitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy AT demirisnikolaos mitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy AT lawleytrevord mitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy AT corriepippag mitretrialprotocolastudytoevaluatethemicrobiomeasabiomarkerofefficacyandtoxicityincancerpatientsreceivingimmunecheckpointinhibitortherapy |