Cargando…
What is the effectiveness of community-based health promotion campaigns on chlamydia screening uptake in young people and what barriers and facilitators have been identified? A mixed-methods systematic review
BACKGROUND: The UK National Chlamydia Screening Programme uses an opportunistic approach. Many programmes use campaigns to raise awareness of chlamydia screening in young people. This review aimed to assess the effectiveness of campaigns on uptake of chlamydia screening in young people. METHODS: We...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8785066/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34446545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2021-055142 |
_version_ | 1784638883016736768 |
---|---|
author | Pearce, Emma Jolly, Kate Harris, Isobel Marion Adriano, Ada Moore, David Price, Malcolm Ross, Jonathan |
author_facet | Pearce, Emma Jolly, Kate Harris, Isobel Marion Adriano, Ada Moore, David Price, Malcolm Ross, Jonathan |
author_sort | Pearce, Emma |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The UK National Chlamydia Screening Programme uses an opportunistic approach. Many programmes use campaigns to raise awareness of chlamydia screening in young people. This review aimed to assess the effectiveness of campaigns on uptake of chlamydia screening in young people. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods systematic review of articles assessing the outcomes of community-based health-promotion campaigns to increase chlamydia screening in young people, their experiences of the campaigns and other facilitators and barriers to the conduct of the campaigns. We searched four databases for quantitative and qualitative studies with no language restrictions. MAIN RESULTS: From 10 329 records identified, 19 studies (20 articles) were included in the review: 14 quantitative, 2 qualitative and 3 mixed methods. All studies with quantitative outcomes were before-after study designs or interrupted time series. The prediction interval for relative change (RC) in test counts ranged from 0.95 to 1.56, with a summary pooled estimate of RC 1.22 (95% CI 1.14 to 1.30, 13 studies, I(2)=97%). For test positivity rate, 95% prediction interval was 0.59 to 1.48, with a summary pooled estimate of RC 0.93 (95% CI 0.81 to 1.07, 8 studies, I(2)=91.8%). Large variation in characteristics between studies precluded exploring outcomes by type of campaign components. Seven major qualitative themes to improve screening were identified: targeting of campaigns; quality of materials and message; language; anonymity; use of technology; relevance; and variety of testing options. CONCLUSIONS: Health promotion campaigns aiming to increase chlamydia testing in those aged 15–24 years may show some effectiveness in increasing overall numbers of tests, however numbers of positive tests do not follow the same trend. Qualitative findings indicate that campaigns require clear, relevant messaging that displays the full range of testing options and assures anonymity in order to be effective. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8785066 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87850662022-02-04 What is the effectiveness of community-based health promotion campaigns on chlamydia screening uptake in young people and what barriers and facilitators have been identified? A mixed-methods systematic review Pearce, Emma Jolly, Kate Harris, Isobel Marion Adriano, Ada Moore, David Price, Malcolm Ross, Jonathan Sex Transm Infect Review BACKGROUND: The UK National Chlamydia Screening Programme uses an opportunistic approach. Many programmes use campaigns to raise awareness of chlamydia screening in young people. This review aimed to assess the effectiveness of campaigns on uptake of chlamydia screening in young people. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods systematic review of articles assessing the outcomes of community-based health-promotion campaigns to increase chlamydia screening in young people, their experiences of the campaigns and other facilitators and barriers to the conduct of the campaigns. We searched four databases for quantitative and qualitative studies with no language restrictions. MAIN RESULTS: From 10 329 records identified, 19 studies (20 articles) were included in the review: 14 quantitative, 2 qualitative and 3 mixed methods. All studies with quantitative outcomes were before-after study designs or interrupted time series. The prediction interval for relative change (RC) in test counts ranged from 0.95 to 1.56, with a summary pooled estimate of RC 1.22 (95% CI 1.14 to 1.30, 13 studies, I(2)=97%). For test positivity rate, 95% prediction interval was 0.59 to 1.48, with a summary pooled estimate of RC 0.93 (95% CI 0.81 to 1.07, 8 studies, I(2)=91.8%). Large variation in characteristics between studies precluded exploring outcomes by type of campaign components. Seven major qualitative themes to improve screening were identified: targeting of campaigns; quality of materials and message; language; anonymity; use of technology; relevance; and variety of testing options. CONCLUSIONS: Health promotion campaigns aiming to increase chlamydia testing in those aged 15–24 years may show some effectiveness in increasing overall numbers of tests, however numbers of positive tests do not follow the same trend. Qualitative findings indicate that campaigns require clear, relevant messaging that displays the full range of testing options and assures anonymity in order to be effective. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-02 2021-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8785066/ /pubmed/34446545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2021-055142 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Review Pearce, Emma Jolly, Kate Harris, Isobel Marion Adriano, Ada Moore, David Price, Malcolm Ross, Jonathan What is the effectiveness of community-based health promotion campaigns on chlamydia screening uptake in young people and what barriers and facilitators have been identified? A mixed-methods systematic review |
title | What is the effectiveness of community-based health promotion campaigns on chlamydia screening uptake in young people and what barriers and facilitators have been identified? A mixed-methods systematic review |
title_full | What is the effectiveness of community-based health promotion campaigns on chlamydia screening uptake in young people and what barriers and facilitators have been identified? A mixed-methods systematic review |
title_fullStr | What is the effectiveness of community-based health promotion campaigns on chlamydia screening uptake in young people and what barriers and facilitators have been identified? A mixed-methods systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | What is the effectiveness of community-based health promotion campaigns on chlamydia screening uptake in young people and what barriers and facilitators have been identified? A mixed-methods systematic review |
title_short | What is the effectiveness of community-based health promotion campaigns on chlamydia screening uptake in young people and what barriers and facilitators have been identified? A mixed-methods systematic review |
title_sort | what is the effectiveness of community-based health promotion campaigns on chlamydia screening uptake in young people and what barriers and facilitators have been identified? a mixed-methods systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8785066/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34446545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2021-055142 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pearceemma whatistheeffectivenessofcommunitybasedhealthpromotioncampaignsonchlamydiascreeninguptakeinyoungpeopleandwhatbarriersandfacilitatorshavebeenidentifiedamixedmethodssystematicreview AT jollykate whatistheeffectivenessofcommunitybasedhealthpromotioncampaignsonchlamydiascreeninguptakeinyoungpeopleandwhatbarriersandfacilitatorshavebeenidentifiedamixedmethodssystematicreview AT harrisisobelmarion whatistheeffectivenessofcommunitybasedhealthpromotioncampaignsonchlamydiascreeninguptakeinyoungpeopleandwhatbarriersandfacilitatorshavebeenidentifiedamixedmethodssystematicreview AT adrianoada whatistheeffectivenessofcommunitybasedhealthpromotioncampaignsonchlamydiascreeninguptakeinyoungpeopleandwhatbarriersandfacilitatorshavebeenidentifiedamixedmethodssystematicreview AT mooredavid whatistheeffectivenessofcommunitybasedhealthpromotioncampaignsonchlamydiascreeninguptakeinyoungpeopleandwhatbarriersandfacilitatorshavebeenidentifiedamixedmethodssystematicreview AT pricemalcolm whatistheeffectivenessofcommunitybasedhealthpromotioncampaignsonchlamydiascreeninguptakeinyoungpeopleandwhatbarriersandfacilitatorshavebeenidentifiedamixedmethodssystematicreview AT rossjonathan whatistheeffectivenessofcommunitybasedhealthpromotioncampaignsonchlamydiascreeninguptakeinyoungpeopleandwhatbarriersandfacilitatorshavebeenidentifiedamixedmethodssystematicreview |