Cargando…

Perspectives of mild asthma patients on maintenance versus as-needed preventer treatment regimens: a qualitative study

OBJECTIVES: As-needed low-dose combination budesonide-formoterol is recommended by asthma guidelines in many countries as an alternative to maintenance inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for treatment of mild asthma, but there are few data on patient attitudes toward these regimens. This study explored t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Foster, Juliet, Beasley, Richard, Braithwaite, Irene, Harrison, Tim, Holliday, Mark, Pavord, Ian, Reddel, Helen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8785165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35063953
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048537
_version_ 1784638905372377088
author Foster, Juliet
Beasley, Richard
Braithwaite, Irene
Harrison, Tim
Holliday, Mark
Pavord, Ian
Reddel, Helen
author_facet Foster, Juliet
Beasley, Richard
Braithwaite, Irene
Harrison, Tim
Holliday, Mark
Pavord, Ian
Reddel, Helen
author_sort Foster, Juliet
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: As-needed low-dose combination budesonide-formoterol is recommended by asthma guidelines in many countries as an alternative to maintenance inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for treatment of mild asthma, but there are few data on patient attitudes toward these regimens. This study explored the comparative implementation experiences and future treatment preferences of mild asthma patients who had experienced these two treatment regimens. SETTING: A subgroup of adults randomised to maintenance ICS or as-needed ICS-formoterol in a multinational, 52-week open-label randomised controlled trial (NovelSTART) in mild asthma patients were interviewed to explore their motivations for treatment use during the study and their preferences for future treatment. PARTICIPANTS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 74 participants (Maintenance group: n=39, As-needed group n=35, mean age 38 (range 19–69)) and thematically analysed from transcribed audiorecordings. RESULTS: Emergent themes from analysis comprised: ‘How much my asthma affects me’ (how their asthma’s impact affected their self-management motivation); ‘What I know about asthma’ (limited knowledge impeded appropriate self-management decision making); ‘How much effort this treatment regimen involves for me’ (treatment complexity and/or difficulty establishing a medication routine impeded implementation, particularly in the Maintenance group); and ‘My beliefs about the benefits and risks of this treatment’ (patients who considered their treatment as ineffective, eg, limited difference in symptoms relative to salbutamol (both groups) or slower onset of relief (As-needed group) had poor motivation to use the treatment). Due to the simplicity of the as-needed combination strategy, this was the preferred future regimen, even by patients who had not yet tried it. CONCLUSIONS: Key patient perspectives on the implementation of preventer treatments for mild asthma included factors relating to perceived asthma burden, disease knowledge, treatment complexity and treatment usefulness or safety. The as-needed budesonide-formoterol regimen was preferred to maintenance ICS treatment in mild asthma though patient education is urgently needed to address implementation motivation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12615000999538.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8785165
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87851652022-02-04 Perspectives of mild asthma patients on maintenance versus as-needed preventer treatment regimens: a qualitative study Foster, Juliet Beasley, Richard Braithwaite, Irene Harrison, Tim Holliday, Mark Pavord, Ian Reddel, Helen BMJ Open Respiratory Medicine OBJECTIVES: As-needed low-dose combination budesonide-formoterol is recommended by asthma guidelines in many countries as an alternative to maintenance inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for treatment of mild asthma, but there are few data on patient attitudes toward these regimens. This study explored the comparative implementation experiences and future treatment preferences of mild asthma patients who had experienced these two treatment regimens. SETTING: A subgroup of adults randomised to maintenance ICS or as-needed ICS-formoterol in a multinational, 52-week open-label randomised controlled trial (NovelSTART) in mild asthma patients were interviewed to explore their motivations for treatment use during the study and their preferences for future treatment. PARTICIPANTS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 74 participants (Maintenance group: n=39, As-needed group n=35, mean age 38 (range 19–69)) and thematically analysed from transcribed audiorecordings. RESULTS: Emergent themes from analysis comprised: ‘How much my asthma affects me’ (how their asthma’s impact affected their self-management motivation); ‘What I know about asthma’ (limited knowledge impeded appropriate self-management decision making); ‘How much effort this treatment regimen involves for me’ (treatment complexity and/or difficulty establishing a medication routine impeded implementation, particularly in the Maintenance group); and ‘My beliefs about the benefits and risks of this treatment’ (patients who considered their treatment as ineffective, eg, limited difference in symptoms relative to salbutamol (both groups) or slower onset of relief (As-needed group) had poor motivation to use the treatment). Due to the simplicity of the as-needed combination strategy, this was the preferred future regimen, even by patients who had not yet tried it. CONCLUSIONS: Key patient perspectives on the implementation of preventer treatments for mild asthma included factors relating to perceived asthma burden, disease knowledge, treatment complexity and treatment usefulness or safety. The as-needed budesonide-formoterol regimen was preferred to maintenance ICS treatment in mild asthma though patient education is urgently needed to address implementation motivation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12615000999538. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8785165/ /pubmed/35063953 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048537 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Respiratory Medicine
Foster, Juliet
Beasley, Richard
Braithwaite, Irene
Harrison, Tim
Holliday, Mark
Pavord, Ian
Reddel, Helen
Perspectives of mild asthma patients on maintenance versus as-needed preventer treatment regimens: a qualitative study
title Perspectives of mild asthma patients on maintenance versus as-needed preventer treatment regimens: a qualitative study
title_full Perspectives of mild asthma patients on maintenance versus as-needed preventer treatment regimens: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Perspectives of mild asthma patients on maintenance versus as-needed preventer treatment regimens: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Perspectives of mild asthma patients on maintenance versus as-needed preventer treatment regimens: a qualitative study
title_short Perspectives of mild asthma patients on maintenance versus as-needed preventer treatment regimens: a qualitative study
title_sort perspectives of mild asthma patients on maintenance versus as-needed preventer treatment regimens: a qualitative study
topic Respiratory Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8785165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35063953
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048537
work_keys_str_mv AT fosterjuliet perspectivesofmildasthmapatientsonmaintenanceversusasneededpreventertreatmentregimensaqualitativestudy
AT beasleyrichard perspectivesofmildasthmapatientsonmaintenanceversusasneededpreventertreatmentregimensaqualitativestudy
AT braithwaiteirene perspectivesofmildasthmapatientsonmaintenanceversusasneededpreventertreatmentregimensaqualitativestudy
AT harrisontim perspectivesofmildasthmapatientsonmaintenanceversusasneededpreventertreatmentregimensaqualitativestudy
AT hollidaymark perspectivesofmildasthmapatientsonmaintenanceversusasneededpreventertreatmentregimensaqualitativestudy
AT pavordian perspectivesofmildasthmapatientsonmaintenanceversusasneededpreventertreatmentregimensaqualitativestudy
AT reddelhelen perspectivesofmildasthmapatientsonmaintenanceversusasneededpreventertreatmentregimensaqualitativestudy