Cargando…

Incremental net benefit of cholecystectomy compared with alternative treatments in people with gallstones or cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cost–utility studies

INTRODUCTION: Cholecystectomy is a standard treatment in the management of symptomatic gallstone disease. Current literature has contradicting views on the cost-effectiveness of different cholecystectomy treatments. We have conducted a systematic reappraisal of literature concerning the cost-effecti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bagepally, Bhavani Shankara, Sajith Kumar, S, Natarajan, Meenakumari, Sasidharan, Akhil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8785172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35064024
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2021-000779
_version_ 1784638906960969728
author Bagepally, Bhavani Shankara
Sajith Kumar, S
Natarajan, Meenakumari
Sasidharan, Akhil
author_facet Bagepally, Bhavani Shankara
Sajith Kumar, S
Natarajan, Meenakumari
Sasidharan, Akhil
author_sort Bagepally, Bhavani Shankara
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Cholecystectomy is a standard treatment in the management of symptomatic gallstone disease. Current literature has contradicting views on the cost-effectiveness of different cholecystectomy treatments. We have conducted a systematic reappraisal of literature concerning the cost-effectiveness of cholecystectomy in management of gallstone disease. METHODS: We systematically searched for economic evaluation studies from PubMed, Embase and Scopus for eligible studies from inception up to July 2020. We pooled the incremental net benefit (INB) with a 95% CI using a random-effects model. We assessed the heterogeneity using the Cochrane-Q test, I(2) statistic. We have used the modified economic evaluation bias (ECOBIAS) checklist for quality assessment of the selected studies. We assessed the possibility of publication bias using a funnel plot and Egger’s test. RESULTS: We have selected 28 studies for systematic review from a search that retrieved 8710 studies. Among them, seven studies were eligible for meta-analysis, all from high-income countries (HIC). Studies mainly reported comparisons between surgical treatments, but non-surgical gallstone disease management studies were limited. The early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC) was significantly more cost-effective compared with the delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DLC) with an INB of US$1221 (US$187 to US$2255) but with high heterogeneity (I(2)=73.32%). The subgroup and sensitivity analysis also supported that ELC is the most cost-effective option for managing gallstone disease or cholecystitis. CONCLUSION: ELC is more cost-effective than DLC in the treatment of gallstone disease or cholecystitis in HICs. There was insufficient literature on comparison with other treatment options, such as conservative management and limited evidence from other economies. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020194052.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8785172
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87851722022-02-04 Incremental net benefit of cholecystectomy compared with alternative treatments in people with gallstones or cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cost–utility studies Bagepally, Bhavani Shankara Sajith Kumar, S Natarajan, Meenakumari Sasidharan, Akhil BMJ Open Gastroenterol Biliary and Pancreatic Disease INTRODUCTION: Cholecystectomy is a standard treatment in the management of symptomatic gallstone disease. Current literature has contradicting views on the cost-effectiveness of different cholecystectomy treatments. We have conducted a systematic reappraisal of literature concerning the cost-effectiveness of cholecystectomy in management of gallstone disease. METHODS: We systematically searched for economic evaluation studies from PubMed, Embase and Scopus for eligible studies from inception up to July 2020. We pooled the incremental net benefit (INB) with a 95% CI using a random-effects model. We assessed the heterogeneity using the Cochrane-Q test, I(2) statistic. We have used the modified economic evaluation bias (ECOBIAS) checklist for quality assessment of the selected studies. We assessed the possibility of publication bias using a funnel plot and Egger’s test. RESULTS: We have selected 28 studies for systematic review from a search that retrieved 8710 studies. Among them, seven studies were eligible for meta-analysis, all from high-income countries (HIC). Studies mainly reported comparisons between surgical treatments, but non-surgical gallstone disease management studies were limited. The early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC) was significantly more cost-effective compared with the delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DLC) with an INB of US$1221 (US$187 to US$2255) but with high heterogeneity (I(2)=73.32%). The subgroup and sensitivity analysis also supported that ELC is the most cost-effective option for managing gallstone disease or cholecystitis. CONCLUSION: ELC is more cost-effective than DLC in the treatment of gallstone disease or cholecystitis in HICs. There was insufficient literature on comparison with other treatment options, such as conservative management and limited evidence from other economies. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020194052. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8785172/ /pubmed/35064024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2021-000779 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Biliary and Pancreatic Disease
Bagepally, Bhavani Shankara
Sajith Kumar, S
Natarajan, Meenakumari
Sasidharan, Akhil
Incremental net benefit of cholecystectomy compared with alternative treatments in people with gallstones or cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cost–utility studies
title Incremental net benefit of cholecystectomy compared with alternative treatments in people with gallstones or cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cost–utility studies
title_full Incremental net benefit of cholecystectomy compared with alternative treatments in people with gallstones or cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cost–utility studies
title_fullStr Incremental net benefit of cholecystectomy compared with alternative treatments in people with gallstones or cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cost–utility studies
title_full_unstemmed Incremental net benefit of cholecystectomy compared with alternative treatments in people with gallstones or cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cost–utility studies
title_short Incremental net benefit of cholecystectomy compared with alternative treatments in people with gallstones or cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cost–utility studies
title_sort incremental net benefit of cholecystectomy compared with alternative treatments in people with gallstones or cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cost–utility studies
topic Biliary and Pancreatic Disease
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8785172/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35064024
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2021-000779
work_keys_str_mv AT bagepallybhavanishankara incrementalnetbenefitofcholecystectomycomparedwithalternativetreatmentsinpeoplewithgallstonesorcholecystitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcostutilitystudies
AT sajithkumars incrementalnetbenefitofcholecystectomycomparedwithalternativetreatmentsinpeoplewithgallstonesorcholecystitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcostutilitystudies
AT natarajanmeenakumari incrementalnetbenefitofcholecystectomycomparedwithalternativetreatmentsinpeoplewithgallstonesorcholecystitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcostutilitystudies
AT sasidharanakhil incrementalnetbenefitofcholecystectomycomparedwithalternativetreatmentsinpeoplewithgallstonesorcholecystitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofcostutilitystudies