Cargando…

What amount of structural damage defines sacroiliitis: a CT study

OBJECTIVES: To propose a data-driven definition for structural changes of sacroiliac (SI) joints in the context of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) imaging on a large collective of CT datasets. METHODS: 546 individuals (102 axSpA, 80 non-axSpA low back pain and 364 controls without back pain) with SI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hermann, Kay Geert A, Ziegeler, Katharina, Kreutzinger, Virginie, Poddubnyy, Denis, Proft, Fabian, Deppe, Dominik, Greese, Juliane, Sieper, Joachim, Diekhoff, Torsten
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8785200/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35064092
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001939
_version_ 1784638912556171264
author Hermann, Kay Geert A
Ziegeler, Katharina
Kreutzinger, Virginie
Poddubnyy, Denis
Proft, Fabian
Deppe, Dominik
Greese, Juliane
Sieper, Joachim
Diekhoff, Torsten
author_facet Hermann, Kay Geert A
Ziegeler, Katharina
Kreutzinger, Virginie
Poddubnyy, Denis
Proft, Fabian
Deppe, Dominik
Greese, Juliane
Sieper, Joachim
Diekhoff, Torsten
author_sort Hermann, Kay Geert A
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To propose a data-driven definition for structural changes of sacroiliac (SI) joints in the context of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) imaging on a large collective of CT datasets. METHODS: 546 individuals (102 axSpA, 80 non-axSpA low back pain and 364 controls without back pain) with SI joint CTs were evaluated for erosions, sclerosis and ankylosis using a structured scoring system. Lesion frequencies and spatial distribution were compared between groups. Diagnostic performance (sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive predictive values, negative predictive values and positive and negative likelihood ratios) was calculated for different combinations of imaging findings. Clinical diagnosis served as standard of reference. RESULTS: Ankylosis and/or erosions of the middle and dorsal joint portions yielded the best diagnostic performance with SE 67.6% and SP 96.3%. Inclusion of ventral erosions and sclerosis resulted in lower diagnostic performance with SE 71.2%/SP 92.5% and SE 70.6%/SP 90.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Sclerosis and ventrally located erosions of SI joints have lower specificity on CT of the SI joint in the context of axSpA imaging. Ankylosis and/or erosions of the middle and dorsal joint portions show a strong diagnostic performance and are appropriate markers of a positive SI joint by CT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8785200
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87852002022-02-04 What amount of structural damage defines sacroiliitis: a CT study Hermann, Kay Geert A Ziegeler, Katharina Kreutzinger, Virginie Poddubnyy, Denis Proft, Fabian Deppe, Dominik Greese, Juliane Sieper, Joachim Diekhoff, Torsten RMD Open Imaging OBJECTIVES: To propose a data-driven definition for structural changes of sacroiliac (SI) joints in the context of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) imaging on a large collective of CT datasets. METHODS: 546 individuals (102 axSpA, 80 non-axSpA low back pain and 364 controls without back pain) with SI joint CTs were evaluated for erosions, sclerosis and ankylosis using a structured scoring system. Lesion frequencies and spatial distribution were compared between groups. Diagnostic performance (sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive predictive values, negative predictive values and positive and negative likelihood ratios) was calculated for different combinations of imaging findings. Clinical diagnosis served as standard of reference. RESULTS: Ankylosis and/or erosions of the middle and dorsal joint portions yielded the best diagnostic performance with SE 67.6% and SP 96.3%. Inclusion of ventral erosions and sclerosis resulted in lower diagnostic performance with SE 71.2%/SP 92.5% and SE 70.6%/SP 90.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Sclerosis and ventrally located erosions of SI joints have lower specificity on CT of the SI joint in the context of axSpA imaging. Ankylosis and/or erosions of the middle and dorsal joint portions show a strong diagnostic performance and are appropriate markers of a positive SI joint by CT. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8785200/ /pubmed/35064092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001939 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Imaging
Hermann, Kay Geert A
Ziegeler, Katharina
Kreutzinger, Virginie
Poddubnyy, Denis
Proft, Fabian
Deppe, Dominik
Greese, Juliane
Sieper, Joachim
Diekhoff, Torsten
What amount of structural damage defines sacroiliitis: a CT study
title What amount of structural damage defines sacroiliitis: a CT study
title_full What amount of structural damage defines sacroiliitis: a CT study
title_fullStr What amount of structural damage defines sacroiliitis: a CT study
title_full_unstemmed What amount of structural damage defines sacroiliitis: a CT study
title_short What amount of structural damage defines sacroiliitis: a CT study
title_sort what amount of structural damage defines sacroiliitis: a ct study
topic Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8785200/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35064092
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001939
work_keys_str_mv AT hermannkaygeerta whatamountofstructuraldamagedefinessacroiliitisactstudy
AT ziegelerkatharina whatamountofstructuraldamagedefinessacroiliitisactstudy
AT kreutzingervirginie whatamountofstructuraldamagedefinessacroiliitisactstudy
AT poddubnyydenis whatamountofstructuraldamagedefinessacroiliitisactstudy
AT proftfabian whatamountofstructuraldamagedefinessacroiliitisactstudy
AT deppedominik whatamountofstructuraldamagedefinessacroiliitisactstudy
AT greesejuliane whatamountofstructuraldamagedefinessacroiliitisactstudy
AT sieperjoachim whatamountofstructuraldamagedefinessacroiliitisactstudy
AT diekhofftorsten whatamountofstructuraldamagedefinessacroiliitisactstudy