Cargando…
What amount of structural damage defines sacroiliitis: a CT study
OBJECTIVES: To propose a data-driven definition for structural changes of sacroiliac (SI) joints in the context of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) imaging on a large collective of CT datasets. METHODS: 546 individuals (102 axSpA, 80 non-axSpA low back pain and 364 controls without back pain) with SI...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8785200/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35064092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001939 |
_version_ | 1784638912556171264 |
---|---|
author | Hermann, Kay Geert A Ziegeler, Katharina Kreutzinger, Virginie Poddubnyy, Denis Proft, Fabian Deppe, Dominik Greese, Juliane Sieper, Joachim Diekhoff, Torsten |
author_facet | Hermann, Kay Geert A Ziegeler, Katharina Kreutzinger, Virginie Poddubnyy, Denis Proft, Fabian Deppe, Dominik Greese, Juliane Sieper, Joachim Diekhoff, Torsten |
author_sort | Hermann, Kay Geert A |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To propose a data-driven definition for structural changes of sacroiliac (SI) joints in the context of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) imaging on a large collective of CT datasets. METHODS: 546 individuals (102 axSpA, 80 non-axSpA low back pain and 364 controls without back pain) with SI joint CTs were evaluated for erosions, sclerosis and ankylosis using a structured scoring system. Lesion frequencies and spatial distribution were compared between groups. Diagnostic performance (sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive predictive values, negative predictive values and positive and negative likelihood ratios) was calculated for different combinations of imaging findings. Clinical diagnosis served as standard of reference. RESULTS: Ankylosis and/or erosions of the middle and dorsal joint portions yielded the best diagnostic performance with SE 67.6% and SP 96.3%. Inclusion of ventral erosions and sclerosis resulted in lower diagnostic performance with SE 71.2%/SP 92.5% and SE 70.6%/SP 90.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Sclerosis and ventrally located erosions of SI joints have lower specificity on CT of the SI joint in the context of axSpA imaging. Ankylosis and/or erosions of the middle and dorsal joint portions show a strong diagnostic performance and are appropriate markers of a positive SI joint by CT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8785200 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87852002022-02-04 What amount of structural damage defines sacroiliitis: a CT study Hermann, Kay Geert A Ziegeler, Katharina Kreutzinger, Virginie Poddubnyy, Denis Proft, Fabian Deppe, Dominik Greese, Juliane Sieper, Joachim Diekhoff, Torsten RMD Open Imaging OBJECTIVES: To propose a data-driven definition for structural changes of sacroiliac (SI) joints in the context of axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) imaging on a large collective of CT datasets. METHODS: 546 individuals (102 axSpA, 80 non-axSpA low back pain and 364 controls without back pain) with SI joint CTs were evaluated for erosions, sclerosis and ankylosis using a structured scoring system. Lesion frequencies and spatial distribution were compared between groups. Diagnostic performance (sensitivity (SE), specificity (SP), positive predictive values, negative predictive values and positive and negative likelihood ratios) was calculated for different combinations of imaging findings. Clinical diagnosis served as standard of reference. RESULTS: Ankylosis and/or erosions of the middle and dorsal joint portions yielded the best diagnostic performance with SE 67.6% and SP 96.3%. Inclusion of ventral erosions and sclerosis resulted in lower diagnostic performance with SE 71.2%/SP 92.5% and SE 70.6%/SP 90.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Sclerosis and ventrally located erosions of SI joints have lower specificity on CT of the SI joint in the context of axSpA imaging. Ankylosis and/or erosions of the middle and dorsal joint portions show a strong diagnostic performance and are appropriate markers of a positive SI joint by CT. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8785200/ /pubmed/35064092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001939 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Imaging Hermann, Kay Geert A Ziegeler, Katharina Kreutzinger, Virginie Poddubnyy, Denis Proft, Fabian Deppe, Dominik Greese, Juliane Sieper, Joachim Diekhoff, Torsten What amount of structural damage defines sacroiliitis: a CT study |
title | What amount of structural damage defines sacroiliitis: a CT study |
title_full | What amount of structural damage defines sacroiliitis: a CT study |
title_fullStr | What amount of structural damage defines sacroiliitis: a CT study |
title_full_unstemmed | What amount of structural damage defines sacroiliitis: a CT study |
title_short | What amount of structural damage defines sacroiliitis: a CT study |
title_sort | what amount of structural damage defines sacroiliitis: a ct study |
topic | Imaging |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8785200/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35064092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001939 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hermannkaygeerta whatamountofstructuraldamagedefinessacroiliitisactstudy AT ziegelerkatharina whatamountofstructuraldamagedefinessacroiliitisactstudy AT kreutzingervirginie whatamountofstructuraldamagedefinessacroiliitisactstudy AT poddubnyydenis whatamountofstructuraldamagedefinessacroiliitisactstudy AT proftfabian whatamountofstructuraldamagedefinessacroiliitisactstudy AT deppedominik whatamountofstructuraldamagedefinessacroiliitisactstudy AT greesejuliane whatamountofstructuraldamagedefinessacroiliitisactstudy AT sieperjoachim whatamountofstructuraldamagedefinessacroiliitisactstudy AT diekhofftorsten whatamountofstructuraldamagedefinessacroiliitisactstudy |