Cargando…

Comparing Colon Capsule Endoscopy to colonoscopy; a symptomatic patient’s perspective

BACKGROUND: Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE) has proven efficacy in a variety of gastrointestinal diseases. Few studies have assessed patient-reported outcomes and preference between colonoscopy and CCE. METHODS: Patients from our centre who had both a CCE and colonoscopy within a 12-month period were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ismail, Mohd Syafiq, Murphy, Greg, Semenov, S., McNamara, D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8785487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35073873
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-02081-0
_version_ 1784638973564420096
author Ismail, Mohd Syafiq
Murphy, Greg
Semenov, S.
McNamara, D.
author_facet Ismail, Mohd Syafiq
Murphy, Greg
Semenov, S.
McNamara, D.
author_sort Ismail, Mohd Syafiq
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE) has proven efficacy in a variety of gastrointestinal diseases. Few studies have assessed patient-reported outcomes and preference between colonoscopy and CCE. METHODS: Patients from our centre who had both a CCE and colonoscopy within a 12-month period were identified. We performed over-the-phone interviews focused on satisfaction, comfort, and overall preference with a 10-point Likert scale. Electronic records were reviewed; reported Modified-Gloucester-Comfort-Scale (GCS) score, sedation, bowel preparation and endoscopist grade were documented. Data was compared between procedures. A Fishers exact test was used to compare proportions and a Student t-test was used to compare means, a p < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: In all, 40 patients were identified, 57.5% (23/40) were female and the mean age was 48 years (24–78). All patients were referred for investigation of lower gastrointestinal symptoms as part of an ongoing study [Endosc Int Open. 2021;09(06):E965–70]. There was a significance difference in mean comfort (9.2 vs 6.7, p < 0.0001, 95% CI − 3.51 to − 1.44) but not satisfaction (8.3 vs 7.7, p = 0.2, 95% CI − 1.48 to 0.33) between CCE and colonoscopy. Main cause of dissatisfaction with CCE was bowel preparation and for colonoscopy was discomfort. Age and gender were not found to be variables. The correlation between GCS and patient reported values was weak (R = − 0.28). Overall, 77.5% (31/40) of patients would prefer a CCE if they required further bowel investigation. Of these, 77.4% (24/31) preferred a CCE despite the potential need for follow-up colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: CCE has a high satisfaction rating (8.3 vs 7.7) and has a higher patient reported comfort rating (9.2 vs 6.7) than colonoscopy. Studies have confirmed CCE and colonoscopy have equivalent diagnostic yields. The majority of patients in our cohort prefer CCE to colonoscopy. CCE should be considered as an alternative to colonoscopy in selected individuals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8785487
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87854872022-01-24 Comparing Colon Capsule Endoscopy to colonoscopy; a symptomatic patient’s perspective Ismail, Mohd Syafiq Murphy, Greg Semenov, S. McNamara, D. BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE) has proven efficacy in a variety of gastrointestinal diseases. Few studies have assessed patient-reported outcomes and preference between colonoscopy and CCE. METHODS: Patients from our centre who had both a CCE and colonoscopy within a 12-month period were identified. We performed over-the-phone interviews focused on satisfaction, comfort, and overall preference with a 10-point Likert scale. Electronic records were reviewed; reported Modified-Gloucester-Comfort-Scale (GCS) score, sedation, bowel preparation and endoscopist grade were documented. Data was compared between procedures. A Fishers exact test was used to compare proportions and a Student t-test was used to compare means, a p < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: In all, 40 patients were identified, 57.5% (23/40) were female and the mean age was 48 years (24–78). All patients were referred for investigation of lower gastrointestinal symptoms as part of an ongoing study [Endosc Int Open. 2021;09(06):E965–70]. There was a significance difference in mean comfort (9.2 vs 6.7, p < 0.0001, 95% CI − 3.51 to − 1.44) but not satisfaction (8.3 vs 7.7, p = 0.2, 95% CI − 1.48 to 0.33) between CCE and colonoscopy. Main cause of dissatisfaction with CCE was bowel preparation and for colonoscopy was discomfort. Age and gender were not found to be variables. The correlation between GCS and patient reported values was weak (R = − 0.28). Overall, 77.5% (31/40) of patients would prefer a CCE if they required further bowel investigation. Of these, 77.4% (24/31) preferred a CCE despite the potential need for follow-up colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: CCE has a high satisfaction rating (8.3 vs 7.7) and has a higher patient reported comfort rating (9.2 vs 6.7) than colonoscopy. Studies have confirmed CCE and colonoscopy have equivalent diagnostic yields. The majority of patients in our cohort prefer CCE to colonoscopy. CCE should be considered as an alternative to colonoscopy in selected individuals. BioMed Central 2022-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8785487/ /pubmed/35073873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-02081-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ismail, Mohd Syafiq
Murphy, Greg
Semenov, S.
McNamara, D.
Comparing Colon Capsule Endoscopy to colonoscopy; a symptomatic patient’s perspective
title Comparing Colon Capsule Endoscopy to colonoscopy; a symptomatic patient’s perspective
title_full Comparing Colon Capsule Endoscopy to colonoscopy; a symptomatic patient’s perspective
title_fullStr Comparing Colon Capsule Endoscopy to colonoscopy; a symptomatic patient’s perspective
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Colon Capsule Endoscopy to colonoscopy; a symptomatic patient’s perspective
title_short Comparing Colon Capsule Endoscopy to colonoscopy; a symptomatic patient’s perspective
title_sort comparing colon capsule endoscopy to colonoscopy; a symptomatic patient’s perspective
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8785487/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35073873
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-02081-0
work_keys_str_mv AT ismailmohdsyafiq comparingcoloncapsuleendoscopytocolonoscopyasymptomaticpatientsperspective
AT murphygreg comparingcoloncapsuleendoscopytocolonoscopyasymptomaticpatientsperspective
AT semenovs comparingcoloncapsuleendoscopytocolonoscopyasymptomaticpatientsperspective
AT mcnamarad comparingcoloncapsuleendoscopytocolonoscopyasymptomaticpatientsperspective