Cargando…
Comparing Colon Capsule Endoscopy to colonoscopy; a symptomatic patient’s perspective
BACKGROUND: Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE) has proven efficacy in a variety of gastrointestinal diseases. Few studies have assessed patient-reported outcomes and preference between colonoscopy and CCE. METHODS: Patients from our centre who had both a CCE and colonoscopy within a 12-month period were...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8785487/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35073873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-02081-0 |
_version_ | 1784638973564420096 |
---|---|
author | Ismail, Mohd Syafiq Murphy, Greg Semenov, S. McNamara, D. |
author_facet | Ismail, Mohd Syafiq Murphy, Greg Semenov, S. McNamara, D. |
author_sort | Ismail, Mohd Syafiq |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE) has proven efficacy in a variety of gastrointestinal diseases. Few studies have assessed patient-reported outcomes and preference between colonoscopy and CCE. METHODS: Patients from our centre who had both a CCE and colonoscopy within a 12-month period were identified. We performed over-the-phone interviews focused on satisfaction, comfort, and overall preference with a 10-point Likert scale. Electronic records were reviewed; reported Modified-Gloucester-Comfort-Scale (GCS) score, sedation, bowel preparation and endoscopist grade were documented. Data was compared between procedures. A Fishers exact test was used to compare proportions and a Student t-test was used to compare means, a p < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: In all, 40 patients were identified, 57.5% (23/40) were female and the mean age was 48 years (24–78). All patients were referred for investigation of lower gastrointestinal symptoms as part of an ongoing study [Endosc Int Open. 2021;09(06):E965–70]. There was a significance difference in mean comfort (9.2 vs 6.7, p < 0.0001, 95% CI − 3.51 to − 1.44) but not satisfaction (8.3 vs 7.7, p = 0.2, 95% CI − 1.48 to 0.33) between CCE and colonoscopy. Main cause of dissatisfaction with CCE was bowel preparation and for colonoscopy was discomfort. Age and gender were not found to be variables. The correlation between GCS and patient reported values was weak (R = − 0.28). Overall, 77.5% (31/40) of patients would prefer a CCE if they required further bowel investigation. Of these, 77.4% (24/31) preferred a CCE despite the potential need for follow-up colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: CCE has a high satisfaction rating (8.3 vs 7.7) and has a higher patient reported comfort rating (9.2 vs 6.7) than colonoscopy. Studies have confirmed CCE and colonoscopy have equivalent diagnostic yields. The majority of patients in our cohort prefer CCE to colonoscopy. CCE should be considered as an alternative to colonoscopy in selected individuals. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8785487 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87854872022-01-24 Comparing Colon Capsule Endoscopy to colonoscopy; a symptomatic patient’s perspective Ismail, Mohd Syafiq Murphy, Greg Semenov, S. McNamara, D. BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE) has proven efficacy in a variety of gastrointestinal diseases. Few studies have assessed patient-reported outcomes and preference between colonoscopy and CCE. METHODS: Patients from our centre who had both a CCE and colonoscopy within a 12-month period were identified. We performed over-the-phone interviews focused on satisfaction, comfort, and overall preference with a 10-point Likert scale. Electronic records were reviewed; reported Modified-Gloucester-Comfort-Scale (GCS) score, sedation, bowel preparation and endoscopist grade were documented. Data was compared between procedures. A Fishers exact test was used to compare proportions and a Student t-test was used to compare means, a p < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: In all, 40 patients were identified, 57.5% (23/40) were female and the mean age was 48 years (24–78). All patients were referred for investigation of lower gastrointestinal symptoms as part of an ongoing study [Endosc Int Open. 2021;09(06):E965–70]. There was a significance difference in mean comfort (9.2 vs 6.7, p < 0.0001, 95% CI − 3.51 to − 1.44) but not satisfaction (8.3 vs 7.7, p = 0.2, 95% CI − 1.48 to 0.33) between CCE and colonoscopy. Main cause of dissatisfaction with CCE was bowel preparation and for colonoscopy was discomfort. Age and gender were not found to be variables. The correlation between GCS and patient reported values was weak (R = − 0.28). Overall, 77.5% (31/40) of patients would prefer a CCE if they required further bowel investigation. Of these, 77.4% (24/31) preferred a CCE despite the potential need for follow-up colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: CCE has a high satisfaction rating (8.3 vs 7.7) and has a higher patient reported comfort rating (9.2 vs 6.7) than colonoscopy. Studies have confirmed CCE and colonoscopy have equivalent diagnostic yields. The majority of patients in our cohort prefer CCE to colonoscopy. CCE should be considered as an alternative to colonoscopy in selected individuals. BioMed Central 2022-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8785487/ /pubmed/35073873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-02081-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ismail, Mohd Syafiq Murphy, Greg Semenov, S. McNamara, D. Comparing Colon Capsule Endoscopy to colonoscopy; a symptomatic patient’s perspective |
title | Comparing Colon Capsule Endoscopy to colonoscopy; a symptomatic patient’s perspective |
title_full | Comparing Colon Capsule Endoscopy to colonoscopy; a symptomatic patient’s perspective |
title_fullStr | Comparing Colon Capsule Endoscopy to colonoscopy; a symptomatic patient’s perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing Colon Capsule Endoscopy to colonoscopy; a symptomatic patient’s perspective |
title_short | Comparing Colon Capsule Endoscopy to colonoscopy; a symptomatic patient’s perspective |
title_sort | comparing colon capsule endoscopy to colonoscopy; a symptomatic patient’s perspective |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8785487/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35073873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-02081-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ismailmohdsyafiq comparingcoloncapsuleendoscopytocolonoscopyasymptomaticpatientsperspective AT murphygreg comparingcoloncapsuleendoscopytocolonoscopyasymptomaticpatientsperspective AT semenovs comparingcoloncapsuleendoscopytocolonoscopyasymptomaticpatientsperspective AT mcnamarad comparingcoloncapsuleendoscopytocolonoscopyasymptomaticpatientsperspective |