Cargando…

Different internal fixation methods for unstable distal clavicle fractures in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment is advised for unstable distal clavicle fractures (UDCFs). Various kinds of internal fixation methods have been used, but the best fixation is still controversial. METHODS: We systematically searched all studies comparing postoperative outcomes of coracoclavicular (CC)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Yinglong, Guo, Xiaobo, Peng, Hui, Dai, Hai, Huang, Zonggui, Zhao, Jinmin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8785604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35073954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02904-6
_version_ 1784638997362900992
author Xu, Yinglong
Guo, Xiaobo
Peng, Hui
Dai, Hai
Huang, Zonggui
Zhao, Jinmin
author_facet Xu, Yinglong
Guo, Xiaobo
Peng, Hui
Dai, Hai
Huang, Zonggui
Zhao, Jinmin
author_sort Xu, Yinglong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment is advised for unstable distal clavicle fractures (UDCFs). Various kinds of internal fixation methods have been used, but the best fixation is still controversial. METHODS: We systematically searched all studies comparing postoperative outcomes of coracoclavicular (CC) reconstruction (TightRope, EndoButton, Mersilene tape, suture anchor or suture), fracture osteosynthesis (clavicular hook plate (HP), locking compression plate (LCP), Kirschner wire and tension band (KWTB), Kirschner wire (KW)), and a combination of the two methods (LCP + CC or KWTB + CC) for UDCF in PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection via Ovid, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and China Biology Medicine (CBM) databases up to September 16, 2021, with no language restrictions. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to integrate direct and indirect evidence and assess the relative effects of the internal fixation methods. The probability of being the best treatment was assessed by the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). RESULTS: A total of 41 studies were included, involving 1969 patients and seven internal fixation methods. The NMA showed that LCP + CC fixation was associated with better efficacy (odds ratio (OR) 0.60, 95% CI 0.19–1.02, probability rank = 0.93) and fewer complications (odds ratio (OR) 0.22, 95% CI 0.09–0.51, probability rank = 0.69) than any other internal fixation method for UDCFs. The SUCRA probabilities of LCP + CC fixation were 98.6% for the Constant–Murley score and 93.9% for total complications. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that LCP + CC appears to be the best internal fixation method for UDCF. Limited to the quality and quantity of the included studies, much larger and higher-quality RCTs are required to confirm these conclusions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-021-02904-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8785604
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87856042022-01-24 Different internal fixation methods for unstable distal clavicle fractures in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis Xu, Yinglong Guo, Xiaobo Peng, Hui Dai, Hai Huang, Zonggui Zhao, Jinmin J Orthop Surg Res Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment is advised for unstable distal clavicle fractures (UDCFs). Various kinds of internal fixation methods have been used, but the best fixation is still controversial. METHODS: We systematically searched all studies comparing postoperative outcomes of coracoclavicular (CC) reconstruction (TightRope, EndoButton, Mersilene tape, suture anchor or suture), fracture osteosynthesis (clavicular hook plate (HP), locking compression plate (LCP), Kirschner wire and tension band (KWTB), Kirschner wire (KW)), and a combination of the two methods (LCP + CC or KWTB + CC) for UDCF in PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection via Ovid, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and China Biology Medicine (CBM) databases up to September 16, 2021, with no language restrictions. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to integrate direct and indirect evidence and assess the relative effects of the internal fixation methods. The probability of being the best treatment was assessed by the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). RESULTS: A total of 41 studies were included, involving 1969 patients and seven internal fixation methods. The NMA showed that LCP + CC fixation was associated with better efficacy (odds ratio (OR) 0.60, 95% CI 0.19–1.02, probability rank = 0.93) and fewer complications (odds ratio (OR) 0.22, 95% CI 0.09–0.51, probability rank = 0.69) than any other internal fixation method for UDCFs. The SUCRA probabilities of LCP + CC fixation were 98.6% for the Constant–Murley score and 93.9% for total complications. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that LCP + CC appears to be the best internal fixation method for UDCF. Limited to the quality and quantity of the included studies, much larger and higher-quality RCTs are required to confirm these conclusions. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-021-02904-6. BioMed Central 2022-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8785604/ /pubmed/35073954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02904-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Xu, Yinglong
Guo, Xiaobo
Peng, Hui
Dai, Hai
Huang, Zonggui
Zhao, Jinmin
Different internal fixation methods for unstable distal clavicle fractures in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title Different internal fixation methods for unstable distal clavicle fractures in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full Different internal fixation methods for unstable distal clavicle fractures in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Different internal fixation methods for unstable distal clavicle fractures in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Different internal fixation methods for unstable distal clavicle fractures in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_short Different internal fixation methods for unstable distal clavicle fractures in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
title_sort different internal fixation methods for unstable distal clavicle fractures in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8785604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35073954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02904-6
work_keys_str_mv AT xuyinglong differentinternalfixationmethodsforunstabledistalclaviclefracturesinadultsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT guoxiaobo differentinternalfixationmethodsforunstabledistalclaviclefracturesinadultsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT penghui differentinternalfixationmethodsforunstabledistalclaviclefracturesinadultsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT daihai differentinternalfixationmethodsforunstabledistalclaviclefracturesinadultsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT huangzonggui differentinternalfixationmethodsforunstabledistalclaviclefracturesinadultsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT zhaojinmin differentinternalfixationmethodsforunstabledistalclaviclefracturesinadultsasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis