Cargando…

Does neural face processing explain effects of an attachment‐based intervention on maternal sensitivity? A randomized controlled study including pre‐ and postintervention measures

BACKGROUND: Although there is a large body of literature highlighting the behavioral effects of parenting interventions, studies on the neurocognitive mechanisms involved in such intervention effects remain scarce. PURPOSE: The aim of the current study was to test whether changes in neural face proc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kolijn, Laura, van den Bulk, Bianca G., Euser, Saskia, Bakermans‐Kranenburg, Marian J., van IJzendoorn, Marinus H., Huffmeijer, Rens
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8785642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34881520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1972
_version_ 1784639006632312832
author Kolijn, Laura
van den Bulk, Bianca G.
Euser, Saskia
Bakermans‐Kranenburg, Marian J.
van IJzendoorn, Marinus H.
Huffmeijer, Rens
author_facet Kolijn, Laura
van den Bulk, Bianca G.
Euser, Saskia
Bakermans‐Kranenburg, Marian J.
van IJzendoorn, Marinus H.
Huffmeijer, Rens
author_sort Kolijn, Laura
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although there is a large body of literature highlighting the behavioral effects of parenting interventions, studies on the neurocognitive mechanisms involved in such intervention effects remain scarce. PURPOSE: The aim of the current study was to test whether changes in neural face processing (as reflected in N170 amplitudes) would act as a mediator in the association between the Video‐feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting and Sensitive Discipline (VIPP‐SD) and maternal sensitivity. METHODS: A total of 66 mothers of whom a random 33% received the VIPP‐SD and the others a “dummy” intervention participated in pre‐ and postintervention assessments. We recorded mothers' electroencephalographic (EEG) activity in response to photographs of children's neutral, happy, and angry facial expressions. Maternal sensitivity was observed while mothers interacted with their offspring in a semi‐structured play situation. RESULTS: In contrast with our expectations, we did not find evidence for mediation of intervention effects on maternal sensitivity by the N170. CONCLUSION: We discuss that parenting support programs may yield different effects on neurocognitive processes depending on the population and provide recommendations for future research. Our study underscores the importance of reporting null findings and preregistering studies in the field of neurocognitive research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8785642
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87856422022-01-31 Does neural face processing explain effects of an attachment‐based intervention on maternal sensitivity? A randomized controlled study including pre‐ and postintervention measures Kolijn, Laura van den Bulk, Bianca G. Euser, Saskia Bakermans‐Kranenburg, Marian J. van IJzendoorn, Marinus H. Huffmeijer, Rens Brain Behav Original Research BACKGROUND: Although there is a large body of literature highlighting the behavioral effects of parenting interventions, studies on the neurocognitive mechanisms involved in such intervention effects remain scarce. PURPOSE: The aim of the current study was to test whether changes in neural face processing (as reflected in N170 amplitudes) would act as a mediator in the association between the Video‐feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting and Sensitive Discipline (VIPP‐SD) and maternal sensitivity. METHODS: A total of 66 mothers of whom a random 33% received the VIPP‐SD and the others a “dummy” intervention participated in pre‐ and postintervention assessments. We recorded mothers' electroencephalographic (EEG) activity in response to photographs of children's neutral, happy, and angry facial expressions. Maternal sensitivity was observed while mothers interacted with their offspring in a semi‐structured play situation. RESULTS: In contrast with our expectations, we did not find evidence for mediation of intervention effects on maternal sensitivity by the N170. CONCLUSION: We discuss that parenting support programs may yield different effects on neurocognitive processes depending on the population and provide recommendations for future research. Our study underscores the importance of reporting null findings and preregistering studies in the field of neurocognitive research. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8785642/ /pubmed/34881520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1972 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Kolijn, Laura
van den Bulk, Bianca G.
Euser, Saskia
Bakermans‐Kranenburg, Marian J.
van IJzendoorn, Marinus H.
Huffmeijer, Rens
Does neural face processing explain effects of an attachment‐based intervention on maternal sensitivity? A randomized controlled study including pre‐ and postintervention measures
title Does neural face processing explain effects of an attachment‐based intervention on maternal sensitivity? A randomized controlled study including pre‐ and postintervention measures
title_full Does neural face processing explain effects of an attachment‐based intervention on maternal sensitivity? A randomized controlled study including pre‐ and postintervention measures
title_fullStr Does neural face processing explain effects of an attachment‐based intervention on maternal sensitivity? A randomized controlled study including pre‐ and postintervention measures
title_full_unstemmed Does neural face processing explain effects of an attachment‐based intervention on maternal sensitivity? A randomized controlled study including pre‐ and postintervention measures
title_short Does neural face processing explain effects of an attachment‐based intervention on maternal sensitivity? A randomized controlled study including pre‐ and postintervention measures
title_sort does neural face processing explain effects of an attachment‐based intervention on maternal sensitivity? a randomized controlled study including pre‐ and postintervention measures
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8785642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34881520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1972
work_keys_str_mv AT kolijnlaura doesneuralfaceprocessingexplaineffectsofanattachmentbasedinterventiononmaternalsensitivityarandomizedcontrolledstudyincludingpreandpostinterventionmeasures
AT vandenbulkbiancag doesneuralfaceprocessingexplaineffectsofanattachmentbasedinterventiononmaternalsensitivityarandomizedcontrolledstudyincludingpreandpostinterventionmeasures
AT eusersaskia doesneuralfaceprocessingexplaineffectsofanattachmentbasedinterventiononmaternalsensitivityarandomizedcontrolledstudyincludingpreandpostinterventionmeasures
AT bakermanskranenburgmarianj doesneuralfaceprocessingexplaineffectsofanattachmentbasedinterventiononmaternalsensitivityarandomizedcontrolledstudyincludingpreandpostinterventionmeasures
AT vanijzendoornmarinush doesneuralfaceprocessingexplaineffectsofanattachmentbasedinterventiononmaternalsensitivityarandomizedcontrolledstudyincludingpreandpostinterventionmeasures
AT huffmeijerrens doesneuralfaceprocessingexplaineffectsofanattachmentbasedinterventiononmaternalsensitivityarandomizedcontrolledstudyincludingpreandpostinterventionmeasures