Cargando…
Does neural face processing explain effects of an attachment‐based intervention on maternal sensitivity? A randomized controlled study including pre‐ and postintervention measures
BACKGROUND: Although there is a large body of literature highlighting the behavioral effects of parenting interventions, studies on the neurocognitive mechanisms involved in such intervention effects remain scarce. PURPOSE: The aim of the current study was to test whether changes in neural face proc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8785642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34881520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1972 |
_version_ | 1784639006632312832 |
---|---|
author | Kolijn, Laura van den Bulk, Bianca G. Euser, Saskia Bakermans‐Kranenburg, Marian J. van IJzendoorn, Marinus H. Huffmeijer, Rens |
author_facet | Kolijn, Laura van den Bulk, Bianca G. Euser, Saskia Bakermans‐Kranenburg, Marian J. van IJzendoorn, Marinus H. Huffmeijer, Rens |
author_sort | Kolijn, Laura |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although there is a large body of literature highlighting the behavioral effects of parenting interventions, studies on the neurocognitive mechanisms involved in such intervention effects remain scarce. PURPOSE: The aim of the current study was to test whether changes in neural face processing (as reflected in N170 amplitudes) would act as a mediator in the association between the Video‐feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting and Sensitive Discipline (VIPP‐SD) and maternal sensitivity. METHODS: A total of 66 mothers of whom a random 33% received the VIPP‐SD and the others a “dummy” intervention participated in pre‐ and postintervention assessments. We recorded mothers' electroencephalographic (EEG) activity in response to photographs of children's neutral, happy, and angry facial expressions. Maternal sensitivity was observed while mothers interacted with their offspring in a semi‐structured play situation. RESULTS: In contrast with our expectations, we did not find evidence for mediation of intervention effects on maternal sensitivity by the N170. CONCLUSION: We discuss that parenting support programs may yield different effects on neurocognitive processes depending on the population and provide recommendations for future research. Our study underscores the importance of reporting null findings and preregistering studies in the field of neurocognitive research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8785642 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87856422022-01-31 Does neural face processing explain effects of an attachment‐based intervention on maternal sensitivity? A randomized controlled study including pre‐ and postintervention measures Kolijn, Laura van den Bulk, Bianca G. Euser, Saskia Bakermans‐Kranenburg, Marian J. van IJzendoorn, Marinus H. Huffmeijer, Rens Brain Behav Original Research BACKGROUND: Although there is a large body of literature highlighting the behavioral effects of parenting interventions, studies on the neurocognitive mechanisms involved in such intervention effects remain scarce. PURPOSE: The aim of the current study was to test whether changes in neural face processing (as reflected in N170 amplitudes) would act as a mediator in the association between the Video‐feedback Intervention to promote Positive Parenting and Sensitive Discipline (VIPP‐SD) and maternal sensitivity. METHODS: A total of 66 mothers of whom a random 33% received the VIPP‐SD and the others a “dummy” intervention participated in pre‐ and postintervention assessments. We recorded mothers' electroencephalographic (EEG) activity in response to photographs of children's neutral, happy, and angry facial expressions. Maternal sensitivity was observed while mothers interacted with their offspring in a semi‐structured play situation. RESULTS: In contrast with our expectations, we did not find evidence for mediation of intervention effects on maternal sensitivity by the N170. CONCLUSION: We discuss that parenting support programs may yield different effects on neurocognitive processes depending on the population and provide recommendations for future research. Our study underscores the importance of reporting null findings and preregistering studies in the field of neurocognitive research. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-12-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8785642/ /pubmed/34881520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1972 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Brain and Behavior published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Kolijn, Laura van den Bulk, Bianca G. Euser, Saskia Bakermans‐Kranenburg, Marian J. van IJzendoorn, Marinus H. Huffmeijer, Rens Does neural face processing explain effects of an attachment‐based intervention on maternal sensitivity? A randomized controlled study including pre‐ and postintervention measures |
title | Does neural face processing explain effects of an attachment‐based intervention on maternal sensitivity? A randomized controlled study including pre‐ and postintervention measures |
title_full | Does neural face processing explain effects of an attachment‐based intervention on maternal sensitivity? A randomized controlled study including pre‐ and postintervention measures |
title_fullStr | Does neural face processing explain effects of an attachment‐based intervention on maternal sensitivity? A randomized controlled study including pre‐ and postintervention measures |
title_full_unstemmed | Does neural face processing explain effects of an attachment‐based intervention on maternal sensitivity? A randomized controlled study including pre‐ and postintervention measures |
title_short | Does neural face processing explain effects of an attachment‐based intervention on maternal sensitivity? A randomized controlled study including pre‐ and postintervention measures |
title_sort | does neural face processing explain effects of an attachment‐based intervention on maternal sensitivity? a randomized controlled study including pre‐ and postintervention measures |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8785642/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34881520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1972 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kolijnlaura doesneuralfaceprocessingexplaineffectsofanattachmentbasedinterventiononmaternalsensitivityarandomizedcontrolledstudyincludingpreandpostinterventionmeasures AT vandenbulkbiancag doesneuralfaceprocessingexplaineffectsofanattachmentbasedinterventiononmaternalsensitivityarandomizedcontrolledstudyincludingpreandpostinterventionmeasures AT eusersaskia doesneuralfaceprocessingexplaineffectsofanattachmentbasedinterventiononmaternalsensitivityarandomizedcontrolledstudyincludingpreandpostinterventionmeasures AT bakermanskranenburgmarianj doesneuralfaceprocessingexplaineffectsofanattachmentbasedinterventiononmaternalsensitivityarandomizedcontrolledstudyincludingpreandpostinterventionmeasures AT vanijzendoornmarinush doesneuralfaceprocessingexplaineffectsofanattachmentbasedinterventiononmaternalsensitivityarandomizedcontrolledstudyincludingpreandpostinterventionmeasures AT huffmeijerrens doesneuralfaceprocessingexplaineffectsofanattachmentbasedinterventiononmaternalsensitivityarandomizedcontrolledstudyincludingpreandpostinterventionmeasures |