Cargando…

Endoscopic gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis with high-risk surgical patients between transduodenal and transpapillary stenting

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (GBD) has emerged as an alternative GBD technique, particularly for high-risk surgical patients. To prevent stent migration or to facilitate stent deployment, the lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) was recently developed for EUS-GBD. However,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nishiguchi, Kyouhei, Ogura, Takeshi, Okuda, Atsushi, Ueno, Saori, Nishioka, Nobu, Yamada, Masanori, Matsuno, Jun, Ueshima, Kazuya, Yamamoto, Yoshitaro, Higuchi, Kazuhide
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8785679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34782492
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/EUS-D-20-00130
_version_ 1784639014281674752
author Nishiguchi, Kyouhei
Ogura, Takeshi
Okuda, Atsushi
Ueno, Saori
Nishioka, Nobu
Yamada, Masanori
Matsuno, Jun
Ueshima, Kazuya
Yamamoto, Yoshitaro
Higuchi, Kazuhide
author_facet Nishiguchi, Kyouhei
Ogura, Takeshi
Okuda, Atsushi
Ueno, Saori
Nishioka, Nobu
Yamada, Masanori
Matsuno, Jun
Ueshima, Kazuya
Yamamoto, Yoshitaro
Higuchi, Kazuhide
author_sort Nishiguchi, Kyouhei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (GBD) has emerged as an alternative GBD technique, particularly for high-risk surgical patients. To prevent stent migration or to facilitate stent deployment, the lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) was recently developed for EUS-GBD. However, LAMS remains unavailable in several countries and is expensive compared with conventional fully covered self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS). Although several studies have shown the clinical benefits of EUS-GBD using novel FCSEMS or LAMS compared with endoscopic transpapillary GBD (ETGBD), the choice between ETGBD and EUS-GBD using conventional FCSEMS and ETGBD remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate EUS-GBD using conventional FCSEMS compared with ETGBD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This comparative retrospective study included consecutive symptomatic AC patients who underwent gallbladder drainage by either EUS-GBD or ETGBD between January 2015 and December 2018. The main outcome measures were technical success, clinical success, procedure-related and stent-related adverse events, and recurrence of AC during follow-up. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients (44.4% female, 55.6% male) who underwent EUS-GBD (n = 25) or ETGBD (n = 29) were enrolled. Initial technical success rates were 100% with EUS-GBD and 82.7% (24/29) with ETGBD. The median procedure time was significantly shorter for the EUS-GBD group than for the ETGBD group (11.0 vs. 24.0 min, P < 0.05). Procedure-related adverse events did not differ significantly between groups (P = 0.283). During follow-up (median 522 days, range 43 – 1892 days), recurrent acute cholecystitis (AC) was only observed in 4 patients from the ETGBD group. Overall survival did not differ significantly between the EUS-GBD group (mean 1070 days) and ETGBD group (mean 1470 days) (P = 0.292). CONCLUSION: The technical success rate for EUS-GBD using FCSEMS with plastic stent insertion was significantly higher with a shorter procedure time and resulted in a lower rate of recurrent AC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8785679
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87856792022-02-03 Endoscopic gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis with high-risk surgical patients between transduodenal and transpapillary stenting Nishiguchi, Kyouhei Ogura, Takeshi Okuda, Atsushi Ueno, Saori Nishioka, Nobu Yamada, Masanori Matsuno, Jun Ueshima, Kazuya Yamamoto, Yoshitaro Higuchi, Kazuhide Endosc Ultrasound Original Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (GBD) has emerged as an alternative GBD technique, particularly for high-risk surgical patients. To prevent stent migration or to facilitate stent deployment, the lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) was recently developed for EUS-GBD. However, LAMS remains unavailable in several countries and is expensive compared with conventional fully covered self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS). Although several studies have shown the clinical benefits of EUS-GBD using novel FCSEMS or LAMS compared with endoscopic transpapillary GBD (ETGBD), the choice between ETGBD and EUS-GBD using conventional FCSEMS and ETGBD remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate EUS-GBD using conventional FCSEMS compared with ETGBD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This comparative retrospective study included consecutive symptomatic AC patients who underwent gallbladder drainage by either EUS-GBD or ETGBD between January 2015 and December 2018. The main outcome measures were technical success, clinical success, procedure-related and stent-related adverse events, and recurrence of AC during follow-up. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients (44.4% female, 55.6% male) who underwent EUS-GBD (n = 25) or ETGBD (n = 29) were enrolled. Initial technical success rates were 100% with EUS-GBD and 82.7% (24/29) with ETGBD. The median procedure time was significantly shorter for the EUS-GBD group than for the ETGBD group (11.0 vs. 24.0 min, P < 0.05). Procedure-related adverse events did not differ significantly between groups (P = 0.283). During follow-up (median 522 days, range 43 – 1892 days), recurrent acute cholecystitis (AC) was only observed in 4 patients from the ETGBD group. Overall survival did not differ significantly between the EUS-GBD group (mean 1070 days) and ETGBD group (mean 1470 days) (P = 0.292). CONCLUSION: The technical success rate for EUS-GBD using FCSEMS with plastic stent insertion was significantly higher with a shorter procedure time and resulted in a lower rate of recurrent AC. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8785679/ /pubmed/34782492 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/EUS-D-20-00130 Text en Copyright: © 2021 SPRING MEDIA PUBLISHING CO. LTD https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Nishiguchi, Kyouhei
Ogura, Takeshi
Okuda, Atsushi
Ueno, Saori
Nishioka, Nobu
Yamada, Masanori
Matsuno, Jun
Ueshima, Kazuya
Yamamoto, Yoshitaro
Higuchi, Kazuhide
Endoscopic gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis with high-risk surgical patients between transduodenal and transpapillary stenting
title Endoscopic gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis with high-risk surgical patients between transduodenal and transpapillary stenting
title_full Endoscopic gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis with high-risk surgical patients between transduodenal and transpapillary stenting
title_fullStr Endoscopic gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis with high-risk surgical patients between transduodenal and transpapillary stenting
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis with high-risk surgical patients between transduodenal and transpapillary stenting
title_short Endoscopic gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis with high-risk surgical patients between transduodenal and transpapillary stenting
title_sort endoscopic gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis with high-risk surgical patients between transduodenal and transpapillary stenting
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8785679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34782492
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/EUS-D-20-00130
work_keys_str_mv AT nishiguchikyouhei endoscopicgallbladderdrainageforacutecholecystitiswithhighrisksurgicalpatientsbetweentransduodenalandtranspapillarystenting
AT oguratakeshi endoscopicgallbladderdrainageforacutecholecystitiswithhighrisksurgicalpatientsbetweentransduodenalandtranspapillarystenting
AT okudaatsushi endoscopicgallbladderdrainageforacutecholecystitiswithhighrisksurgicalpatientsbetweentransduodenalandtranspapillarystenting
AT uenosaori endoscopicgallbladderdrainageforacutecholecystitiswithhighrisksurgicalpatientsbetweentransduodenalandtranspapillarystenting
AT nishiokanobu endoscopicgallbladderdrainageforacutecholecystitiswithhighrisksurgicalpatientsbetweentransduodenalandtranspapillarystenting
AT yamadamasanori endoscopicgallbladderdrainageforacutecholecystitiswithhighrisksurgicalpatientsbetweentransduodenalandtranspapillarystenting
AT matsunojun endoscopicgallbladderdrainageforacutecholecystitiswithhighrisksurgicalpatientsbetweentransduodenalandtranspapillarystenting
AT ueshimakazuya endoscopicgallbladderdrainageforacutecholecystitiswithhighrisksurgicalpatientsbetweentransduodenalandtranspapillarystenting
AT yamamotoyoshitaro endoscopicgallbladderdrainageforacutecholecystitiswithhighrisksurgicalpatientsbetweentransduodenalandtranspapillarystenting
AT higuchikazuhide endoscopicgallbladderdrainageforacutecholecystitiswithhighrisksurgicalpatientsbetweentransduodenalandtranspapillarystenting