Cargando…
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Parkinson's Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: Clinical impact of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) alone for Parkinson's disease (PD) is still a challenge. Thus, there is a need to synthesize available results, analyze methodologically and statistically, and provide evidence to guide tDCS in PD. Objective: Investig...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8785799/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35082749 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.794784 |
_version_ | 1784639023135850496 |
---|---|
author | de Oliveira, Paloma Cristina Alves de Araújo, Thiago Anderson Brito Machado, Daniel Gomes da Silva Rodrigues, Abner Cardoso Bikson, Marom Andrade, Suellen Marinho Okano, Alexandre Hideki Simplicio, Hougelle Pegado, Rodrigo Morya, Edgard |
author_facet | de Oliveira, Paloma Cristina Alves de Araújo, Thiago Anderson Brito Machado, Daniel Gomes da Silva Rodrigues, Abner Cardoso Bikson, Marom Andrade, Suellen Marinho Okano, Alexandre Hideki Simplicio, Hougelle Pegado, Rodrigo Morya, Edgard |
author_sort | de Oliveira, Paloma Cristina Alves |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Clinical impact of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) alone for Parkinson's disease (PD) is still a challenge. Thus, there is a need to synthesize available results, analyze methodologically and statistically, and provide evidence to guide tDCS in PD. Objective: Investigate isolated tDCS effect in different brain areas and number of stimulated targets on PD motor symptoms. Methods: A systematic review was carried out up to February 2021, in databases: Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of science. Full text articles evaluating effect of active tDCS (anodic or cathodic) vs. sham or control on motor symptoms of PD were included. Results: Ten studies (n = 236) were included in meta-analysis and 25 studies (n = 405) in qualitative synthesis. The most frequently stimulated targets were dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and primary motor cortex. No significant effect was found among single targets on motor outcomes: Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) III – motor aspects (MD = −0.98%, 95% CI = −10.03 to 8.07, p = 0.83, I(2) = 0%), UPDRS IV – dyskinesias (MD = −0.89%, CI 95% = −3.82 to 2.03, p = 0.55, I(2) = 0%) and motor fluctuations (MD = −0.67%, CI 95% = −2.45 to 1.11, p = 0.46, I(2) = 0%), timed up and go – gait (MD = 0.14%, CI 95% = −0.72 to 0.99, p = 0.75, I(2) = 0%), Berg Balance Scale – balance (MD = 0.73%, CI 95% = −1.01 to 2.47, p = 0.41, I(2) = 0%). There was no significant effect of single vs. multiple targets in: UPDRS III – motor aspects (MD = 2.05%, CI 95% = −1.96 to 6.06, p = 0.32, I(2) = 0%) and gait (SMD = −0.05%, 95% CI = −0.28 to 0.17, p = 0.64, I(2) = 0%). Simple univariate meta-regression analysis between treatment dosage and effect size revealed that number of sessions (estimate = −1.7, SE = 1.51, z-score = −1.18, p = 0.2, IC = −4.75 to 1.17) and cumulative time (estimate = −0.07, SE = 0.07, z-score = −0.99, p = 0.31, IC = −0.21 to 0.07) had no significant association. Conclusion: There was no significant tDCS alone short-term effect on motor function, balance, gait, dyskinesias or motor fluctuations in Parkinson's disease, regardless of brain area or targets stimulated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8785799 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87857992022-01-25 Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Parkinson's Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis de Oliveira, Paloma Cristina Alves de Araújo, Thiago Anderson Brito Machado, Daniel Gomes da Silva Rodrigues, Abner Cardoso Bikson, Marom Andrade, Suellen Marinho Okano, Alexandre Hideki Simplicio, Hougelle Pegado, Rodrigo Morya, Edgard Front Neurol Neurology Background: Clinical impact of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) alone for Parkinson's disease (PD) is still a challenge. Thus, there is a need to synthesize available results, analyze methodologically and statistically, and provide evidence to guide tDCS in PD. Objective: Investigate isolated tDCS effect in different brain areas and number of stimulated targets on PD motor symptoms. Methods: A systematic review was carried out up to February 2021, in databases: Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of science. Full text articles evaluating effect of active tDCS (anodic or cathodic) vs. sham or control on motor symptoms of PD were included. Results: Ten studies (n = 236) were included in meta-analysis and 25 studies (n = 405) in qualitative synthesis. The most frequently stimulated targets were dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and primary motor cortex. No significant effect was found among single targets on motor outcomes: Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) III – motor aspects (MD = −0.98%, 95% CI = −10.03 to 8.07, p = 0.83, I(2) = 0%), UPDRS IV – dyskinesias (MD = −0.89%, CI 95% = −3.82 to 2.03, p = 0.55, I(2) = 0%) and motor fluctuations (MD = −0.67%, CI 95% = −2.45 to 1.11, p = 0.46, I(2) = 0%), timed up and go – gait (MD = 0.14%, CI 95% = −0.72 to 0.99, p = 0.75, I(2) = 0%), Berg Balance Scale – balance (MD = 0.73%, CI 95% = −1.01 to 2.47, p = 0.41, I(2) = 0%). There was no significant effect of single vs. multiple targets in: UPDRS III – motor aspects (MD = 2.05%, CI 95% = −1.96 to 6.06, p = 0.32, I(2) = 0%) and gait (SMD = −0.05%, 95% CI = −0.28 to 0.17, p = 0.64, I(2) = 0%). Simple univariate meta-regression analysis between treatment dosage and effect size revealed that number of sessions (estimate = −1.7, SE = 1.51, z-score = −1.18, p = 0.2, IC = −4.75 to 1.17) and cumulative time (estimate = −0.07, SE = 0.07, z-score = −0.99, p = 0.31, IC = −0.21 to 0.07) had no significant association. Conclusion: There was no significant tDCS alone short-term effect on motor function, balance, gait, dyskinesias or motor fluctuations in Parkinson's disease, regardless of brain area or targets stimulated. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8785799/ /pubmed/35082749 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.794784 Text en Copyright © 2022 Oliveira, Araújo, Machado, Rodrigues, Bikson, Andrade, Okano, Simplicio, Pegado and Morya. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neurology de Oliveira, Paloma Cristina Alves de Araújo, Thiago Anderson Brito Machado, Daniel Gomes da Silva Rodrigues, Abner Cardoso Bikson, Marom Andrade, Suellen Marinho Okano, Alexandre Hideki Simplicio, Hougelle Pegado, Rodrigo Morya, Edgard Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Parkinson's Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Parkinson's Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Parkinson's Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Parkinson's Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Parkinson's Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Parkinson's Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | transcranial direct current stimulation on parkinson's disease: systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8785799/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35082749 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.794784 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deoliveirapalomacristinaalves transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationonparkinsonsdiseasesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dearaujothiagoandersonbrito transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationonparkinsonsdiseasesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT machadodanielgomesdasilva transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationonparkinsonsdiseasesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT rodriguesabnercardoso transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationonparkinsonsdiseasesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT biksonmarom transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationonparkinsonsdiseasesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT andradesuellenmarinho transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationonparkinsonsdiseasesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT okanoalexandrehideki transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationonparkinsonsdiseasesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT simpliciohougelle transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationonparkinsonsdiseasesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT pegadorodrigo transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationonparkinsonsdiseasesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT moryaedgard transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationonparkinsonsdiseasesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |