Cargando…

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Parkinson's Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Clinical impact of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) alone for Parkinson's disease (PD) is still a challenge. Thus, there is a need to synthesize available results, analyze methodologically and statistically, and provide evidence to guide tDCS in PD. Objective: Investig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Oliveira, Paloma Cristina Alves, de Araújo, Thiago Anderson Brito, Machado, Daniel Gomes da Silva, Rodrigues, Abner Cardoso, Bikson, Marom, Andrade, Suellen Marinho, Okano, Alexandre Hideki, Simplicio, Hougelle, Pegado, Rodrigo, Morya, Edgard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8785799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35082749
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.794784
_version_ 1784639023135850496
author de Oliveira, Paloma Cristina Alves
de Araújo, Thiago Anderson Brito
Machado, Daniel Gomes da Silva
Rodrigues, Abner Cardoso
Bikson, Marom
Andrade, Suellen Marinho
Okano, Alexandre Hideki
Simplicio, Hougelle
Pegado, Rodrigo
Morya, Edgard
author_facet de Oliveira, Paloma Cristina Alves
de Araújo, Thiago Anderson Brito
Machado, Daniel Gomes da Silva
Rodrigues, Abner Cardoso
Bikson, Marom
Andrade, Suellen Marinho
Okano, Alexandre Hideki
Simplicio, Hougelle
Pegado, Rodrigo
Morya, Edgard
author_sort de Oliveira, Paloma Cristina Alves
collection PubMed
description Background: Clinical impact of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) alone for Parkinson's disease (PD) is still a challenge. Thus, there is a need to synthesize available results, analyze methodologically and statistically, and provide evidence to guide tDCS in PD. Objective: Investigate isolated tDCS effect in different brain areas and number of stimulated targets on PD motor symptoms. Methods: A systematic review was carried out up to February 2021, in databases: Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of science. Full text articles evaluating effect of active tDCS (anodic or cathodic) vs. sham or control on motor symptoms of PD were included. Results: Ten studies (n = 236) were included in meta-analysis and 25 studies (n = 405) in qualitative synthesis. The most frequently stimulated targets were dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and primary motor cortex. No significant effect was found among single targets on motor outcomes: Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) III – motor aspects (MD = −0.98%, 95% CI = −10.03 to 8.07, p = 0.83, I(2) = 0%), UPDRS IV – dyskinesias (MD = −0.89%, CI 95% = −3.82 to 2.03, p = 0.55, I(2) = 0%) and motor fluctuations (MD = −0.67%, CI 95% = −2.45 to 1.11, p = 0.46, I(2) = 0%), timed up and go – gait (MD = 0.14%, CI 95% = −0.72 to 0.99, p = 0.75, I(2) = 0%), Berg Balance Scale – balance (MD = 0.73%, CI 95% = −1.01 to 2.47, p = 0.41, I(2) = 0%). There was no significant effect of single vs. multiple targets in: UPDRS III – motor aspects (MD = 2.05%, CI 95% = −1.96 to 6.06, p = 0.32, I(2) = 0%) and gait (SMD = −0.05%, 95% CI = −0.28 to 0.17, p = 0.64, I(2) = 0%). Simple univariate meta-regression analysis between treatment dosage and effect size revealed that number of sessions (estimate = −1.7, SE = 1.51, z-score = −1.18, p = 0.2, IC = −4.75 to 1.17) and cumulative time (estimate = −0.07, SE = 0.07, z-score = −0.99, p = 0.31, IC = −0.21 to 0.07) had no significant association. Conclusion: There was no significant tDCS alone short-term effect on motor function, balance, gait, dyskinesias or motor fluctuations in Parkinson's disease, regardless of brain area or targets stimulated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8785799
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87857992022-01-25 Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Parkinson's Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis de Oliveira, Paloma Cristina Alves de Araújo, Thiago Anderson Brito Machado, Daniel Gomes da Silva Rodrigues, Abner Cardoso Bikson, Marom Andrade, Suellen Marinho Okano, Alexandre Hideki Simplicio, Hougelle Pegado, Rodrigo Morya, Edgard Front Neurol Neurology Background: Clinical impact of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) alone for Parkinson's disease (PD) is still a challenge. Thus, there is a need to synthesize available results, analyze methodologically and statistically, and provide evidence to guide tDCS in PD. Objective: Investigate isolated tDCS effect in different brain areas and number of stimulated targets on PD motor symptoms. Methods: A systematic review was carried out up to February 2021, in databases: Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of science. Full text articles evaluating effect of active tDCS (anodic or cathodic) vs. sham or control on motor symptoms of PD were included. Results: Ten studies (n = 236) were included in meta-analysis and 25 studies (n = 405) in qualitative synthesis. The most frequently stimulated targets were dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and primary motor cortex. No significant effect was found among single targets on motor outcomes: Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) III – motor aspects (MD = −0.98%, 95% CI = −10.03 to 8.07, p = 0.83, I(2) = 0%), UPDRS IV – dyskinesias (MD = −0.89%, CI 95% = −3.82 to 2.03, p = 0.55, I(2) = 0%) and motor fluctuations (MD = −0.67%, CI 95% = −2.45 to 1.11, p = 0.46, I(2) = 0%), timed up and go – gait (MD = 0.14%, CI 95% = −0.72 to 0.99, p = 0.75, I(2) = 0%), Berg Balance Scale – balance (MD = 0.73%, CI 95% = −1.01 to 2.47, p = 0.41, I(2) = 0%). There was no significant effect of single vs. multiple targets in: UPDRS III – motor aspects (MD = 2.05%, CI 95% = −1.96 to 6.06, p = 0.32, I(2) = 0%) and gait (SMD = −0.05%, 95% CI = −0.28 to 0.17, p = 0.64, I(2) = 0%). Simple univariate meta-regression analysis between treatment dosage and effect size revealed that number of sessions (estimate = −1.7, SE = 1.51, z-score = −1.18, p = 0.2, IC = −4.75 to 1.17) and cumulative time (estimate = −0.07, SE = 0.07, z-score = −0.99, p = 0.31, IC = −0.21 to 0.07) had no significant association. Conclusion: There was no significant tDCS alone short-term effect on motor function, balance, gait, dyskinesias or motor fluctuations in Parkinson's disease, regardless of brain area or targets stimulated. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8785799/ /pubmed/35082749 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.794784 Text en Copyright © 2022 Oliveira, Araújo, Machado, Rodrigues, Bikson, Andrade, Okano, Simplicio, Pegado and Morya. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
de Oliveira, Paloma Cristina Alves
de Araújo, Thiago Anderson Brito
Machado, Daniel Gomes da Silva
Rodrigues, Abner Cardoso
Bikson, Marom
Andrade, Suellen Marinho
Okano, Alexandre Hideki
Simplicio, Hougelle
Pegado, Rodrigo
Morya, Edgard
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Parkinson's Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Parkinson's Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Parkinson's Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Parkinson's Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Parkinson's Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Parkinson's Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort transcranial direct current stimulation on parkinson's disease: systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8785799/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35082749
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.794784
work_keys_str_mv AT deoliveirapalomacristinaalves transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationonparkinsonsdiseasesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dearaujothiagoandersonbrito transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationonparkinsonsdiseasesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT machadodanielgomesdasilva transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationonparkinsonsdiseasesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT rodriguesabnercardoso transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationonparkinsonsdiseasesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT biksonmarom transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationonparkinsonsdiseasesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT andradesuellenmarinho transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationonparkinsonsdiseasesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT okanoalexandrehideki transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationonparkinsonsdiseasesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT simpliciohougelle transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationonparkinsonsdiseasesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pegadorodrigo transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationonparkinsonsdiseasesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT moryaedgard transcranialdirectcurrentstimulationonparkinsonsdiseasesystematicreviewandmetaanalysis