Cargando…

Correlation Between Clinical Diagnosis, MRI, and Arthroscopy in Diagnosing Shoulder Pathology

Introduction Shoulder disorders are frequently encountered by clinicians and are a common cause of musculoskeletal pain in the general population. Clinical tests specific to each shoulder pathology, MRI, and arthroscopy are the most relied upon modalities of diagnosis used by many clinicians. The ai...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thiagarajan, Aarthi, Nagaraj, Raghu, Marathe, Kiran
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8786586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35106207
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.20654
_version_ 1784639143146422272
author Thiagarajan, Aarthi
Nagaraj, Raghu
Marathe, Kiran
author_facet Thiagarajan, Aarthi
Nagaraj, Raghu
Marathe, Kiran
author_sort Thiagarajan, Aarthi
collection PubMed
description Introduction Shoulder disorders are frequently encountered by clinicians and are a common cause of musculoskeletal pain in the general population. Clinical tests specific to each shoulder pathology, MRI, and arthroscopy are the most relied upon modalities of diagnosis used by many clinicians. The aim of this study was to correlate clinical tests and MRI with arthroscopy as the gold standard and whether a negative MRI with a positive clinical test could justify an arthroscopy. Materials and methods A total of 120 consecutive patients who had a history of shoulder pain or instability were evaluated by clinical tests and MRI, and underwent arthroscopy. Based on the confirmatory findings of arthroscopy, they were classified as True Positive (TP), True Negative (TN), False Positive (FP) and False Negative (FN) for each modality i.e., clinical tests and MRI. Results Clinical assessment of rotator cuff tears in comparison to arthroscopy yielded a sensitivity of 96.88%, specificity of 92.86% and diagnostic accuracy of 95%, whilst MRI had a sensitivity of 90.62%, specificity of 92.86% and diagnostic accuracy of 91.67%. In anterior labral lesions, clinical assessment had a sensitivity of 94.44%, specificity of 97.62 % and diagnostic accuracy of 96.67%, whilst MRI had a sensitivity of 83.33%, specificity of 92.86%, with diagnostic accuracy of 90%. Interestingly, in the clinical assessment of superior labral tear from anterior to posterior (SLAP) lesions, a sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 95%, and diagnostic accuracy of 93.33% were observed while MRI had a sensitivity of 60%, specificity of 92.50%, and diagnostic accuracy of 81.67%. Conclusion On the basis of these results, clinical assessment appears to be an effective tool in diagnosing shoulder pathologies, whereas MRI, though reliable in the identification of rotator cuff tears and instability, does not identify patients with SLAP lesions effectively. This study reinforces the importance of a good clinical examination of the shoulder, especially in chronic pain and an uncertain MRI, therefore improving patient management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8786586
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87865862022-01-31 Correlation Between Clinical Diagnosis, MRI, and Arthroscopy in Diagnosing Shoulder Pathology Thiagarajan, Aarthi Nagaraj, Raghu Marathe, Kiran Cureus Orthopedics Introduction Shoulder disorders are frequently encountered by clinicians and are a common cause of musculoskeletal pain in the general population. Clinical tests specific to each shoulder pathology, MRI, and arthroscopy are the most relied upon modalities of diagnosis used by many clinicians. The aim of this study was to correlate clinical tests and MRI with arthroscopy as the gold standard and whether a negative MRI with a positive clinical test could justify an arthroscopy. Materials and methods A total of 120 consecutive patients who had a history of shoulder pain or instability were evaluated by clinical tests and MRI, and underwent arthroscopy. Based on the confirmatory findings of arthroscopy, they were classified as True Positive (TP), True Negative (TN), False Positive (FP) and False Negative (FN) for each modality i.e., clinical tests and MRI. Results Clinical assessment of rotator cuff tears in comparison to arthroscopy yielded a sensitivity of 96.88%, specificity of 92.86% and diagnostic accuracy of 95%, whilst MRI had a sensitivity of 90.62%, specificity of 92.86% and diagnostic accuracy of 91.67%. In anterior labral lesions, clinical assessment had a sensitivity of 94.44%, specificity of 97.62 % and diagnostic accuracy of 96.67%, whilst MRI had a sensitivity of 83.33%, specificity of 92.86%, with diagnostic accuracy of 90%. Interestingly, in the clinical assessment of superior labral tear from anterior to posterior (SLAP) lesions, a sensitivity of 90%, specificity of 95%, and diagnostic accuracy of 93.33% were observed while MRI had a sensitivity of 60%, specificity of 92.50%, and diagnostic accuracy of 81.67%. Conclusion On the basis of these results, clinical assessment appears to be an effective tool in diagnosing shoulder pathologies, whereas MRI, though reliable in the identification of rotator cuff tears and instability, does not identify patients with SLAP lesions effectively. This study reinforces the importance of a good clinical examination of the shoulder, especially in chronic pain and an uncertain MRI, therefore improving patient management. Cureus 2021-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8786586/ /pubmed/35106207 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.20654 Text en Copyright © 2021, Thiagarajan et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Orthopedics
Thiagarajan, Aarthi
Nagaraj, Raghu
Marathe, Kiran
Correlation Between Clinical Diagnosis, MRI, and Arthroscopy in Diagnosing Shoulder Pathology
title Correlation Between Clinical Diagnosis, MRI, and Arthroscopy in Diagnosing Shoulder Pathology
title_full Correlation Between Clinical Diagnosis, MRI, and Arthroscopy in Diagnosing Shoulder Pathology
title_fullStr Correlation Between Clinical Diagnosis, MRI, and Arthroscopy in Diagnosing Shoulder Pathology
title_full_unstemmed Correlation Between Clinical Diagnosis, MRI, and Arthroscopy in Diagnosing Shoulder Pathology
title_short Correlation Between Clinical Diagnosis, MRI, and Arthroscopy in Diagnosing Shoulder Pathology
title_sort correlation between clinical diagnosis, mri, and arthroscopy in diagnosing shoulder pathology
topic Orthopedics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8786586/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35106207
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.20654
work_keys_str_mv AT thiagarajanaarthi correlationbetweenclinicaldiagnosismriandarthroscopyindiagnosingshoulderpathology
AT nagarajraghu correlationbetweenclinicaldiagnosismriandarthroscopyindiagnosingshoulderpathology
AT marathekiran correlationbetweenclinicaldiagnosismriandarthroscopyindiagnosingshoulderpathology