Cargando…

Designing and interpreting 4D tumour spheroid experiments

Tumour spheroid experiments are routinely used to study cancer progression and treatment. Various and inconsistent experimental designs are used, leading to challenges in interpretation and reproducibility. Using multiple experimental designs, live-dead cell staining, and real-time cell cycle imagin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murphy, Ryan J., Browning, Alexander P., Gunasingh, Gency, Haass, Nikolas K., Simpson, Matthew J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8786869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35075254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-03018-3
_version_ 1784639215342977024
author Murphy, Ryan J.
Browning, Alexander P.
Gunasingh, Gency
Haass, Nikolas K.
Simpson, Matthew J.
author_facet Murphy, Ryan J.
Browning, Alexander P.
Gunasingh, Gency
Haass, Nikolas K.
Simpson, Matthew J.
author_sort Murphy, Ryan J.
collection PubMed
description Tumour spheroid experiments are routinely used to study cancer progression and treatment. Various and inconsistent experimental designs are used, leading to challenges in interpretation and reproducibility. Using multiple experimental designs, live-dead cell staining, and real-time cell cycle imaging, we measure necrotic and proliferation-inhibited regions in over 1000 4D tumour spheroids (3D space plus cell cycle status). By intentionally varying the initial spheroid size and temporal sampling frequencies across multiple cell lines, we collect an abundance of measurements of internal spheroid structure. These data are difficult to compare and interpret. However, using an objective mathematical modelling framework and statistical identifiability analysis we quantitatively compare experimental designs and identify design choices that produce reliable biological insight. Measurements of internal spheroid structure provide the most insight, whereas varying initial spheroid size and temporal measurement frequency is less important. Our general framework applies to spheroids grown in different conditions and with different cell types.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8786869
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87868692022-02-07 Designing and interpreting 4D tumour spheroid experiments Murphy, Ryan J. Browning, Alexander P. Gunasingh, Gency Haass, Nikolas K. Simpson, Matthew J. Commun Biol Article Tumour spheroid experiments are routinely used to study cancer progression and treatment. Various and inconsistent experimental designs are used, leading to challenges in interpretation and reproducibility. Using multiple experimental designs, live-dead cell staining, and real-time cell cycle imaging, we measure necrotic and proliferation-inhibited regions in over 1000 4D tumour spheroids (3D space plus cell cycle status). By intentionally varying the initial spheroid size and temporal sampling frequencies across multiple cell lines, we collect an abundance of measurements of internal spheroid structure. These data are difficult to compare and interpret. However, using an objective mathematical modelling framework and statistical identifiability analysis we quantitatively compare experimental designs and identify design choices that produce reliable biological insight. Measurements of internal spheroid structure provide the most insight, whereas varying initial spheroid size and temporal measurement frequency is less important. Our general framework applies to spheroids grown in different conditions and with different cell types. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8786869/ /pubmed/35075254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-03018-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Murphy, Ryan J.
Browning, Alexander P.
Gunasingh, Gency
Haass, Nikolas K.
Simpson, Matthew J.
Designing and interpreting 4D tumour spheroid experiments
title Designing and interpreting 4D tumour spheroid experiments
title_full Designing and interpreting 4D tumour spheroid experiments
title_fullStr Designing and interpreting 4D tumour spheroid experiments
title_full_unstemmed Designing and interpreting 4D tumour spheroid experiments
title_short Designing and interpreting 4D tumour spheroid experiments
title_sort designing and interpreting 4d tumour spheroid experiments
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8786869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35075254
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-03018-3
work_keys_str_mv AT murphyryanj designingandinterpreting4dtumourspheroidexperiments
AT browningalexanderp designingandinterpreting4dtumourspheroidexperiments
AT gunasinghgency designingandinterpreting4dtumourspheroidexperiments
AT haassnikolask designingandinterpreting4dtumourspheroidexperiments
AT simpsonmatthewj designingandinterpreting4dtumourspheroidexperiments