Cargando…
Designing and interpreting 4D tumour spheroid experiments
Tumour spheroid experiments are routinely used to study cancer progression and treatment. Various and inconsistent experimental designs are used, leading to challenges in interpretation and reproducibility. Using multiple experimental designs, live-dead cell staining, and real-time cell cycle imagin...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8786869/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35075254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-03018-3 |
_version_ | 1784639215342977024 |
---|---|
author | Murphy, Ryan J. Browning, Alexander P. Gunasingh, Gency Haass, Nikolas K. Simpson, Matthew J. |
author_facet | Murphy, Ryan J. Browning, Alexander P. Gunasingh, Gency Haass, Nikolas K. Simpson, Matthew J. |
author_sort | Murphy, Ryan J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Tumour spheroid experiments are routinely used to study cancer progression and treatment. Various and inconsistent experimental designs are used, leading to challenges in interpretation and reproducibility. Using multiple experimental designs, live-dead cell staining, and real-time cell cycle imaging, we measure necrotic and proliferation-inhibited regions in over 1000 4D tumour spheroids (3D space plus cell cycle status). By intentionally varying the initial spheroid size and temporal sampling frequencies across multiple cell lines, we collect an abundance of measurements of internal spheroid structure. These data are difficult to compare and interpret. However, using an objective mathematical modelling framework and statistical identifiability analysis we quantitatively compare experimental designs and identify design choices that produce reliable biological insight. Measurements of internal spheroid structure provide the most insight, whereas varying initial spheroid size and temporal measurement frequency is less important. Our general framework applies to spheroids grown in different conditions and with different cell types. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8786869 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87868692022-02-07 Designing and interpreting 4D tumour spheroid experiments Murphy, Ryan J. Browning, Alexander P. Gunasingh, Gency Haass, Nikolas K. Simpson, Matthew J. Commun Biol Article Tumour spheroid experiments are routinely used to study cancer progression and treatment. Various and inconsistent experimental designs are used, leading to challenges in interpretation and reproducibility. Using multiple experimental designs, live-dead cell staining, and real-time cell cycle imaging, we measure necrotic and proliferation-inhibited regions in over 1000 4D tumour spheroids (3D space plus cell cycle status). By intentionally varying the initial spheroid size and temporal sampling frequencies across multiple cell lines, we collect an abundance of measurements of internal spheroid structure. These data are difficult to compare and interpret. However, using an objective mathematical modelling framework and statistical identifiability analysis we quantitatively compare experimental designs and identify design choices that produce reliable biological insight. Measurements of internal spheroid structure provide the most insight, whereas varying initial spheroid size and temporal measurement frequency is less important. Our general framework applies to spheroids grown in different conditions and with different cell types. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8786869/ /pubmed/35075254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-03018-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Murphy, Ryan J. Browning, Alexander P. Gunasingh, Gency Haass, Nikolas K. Simpson, Matthew J. Designing and interpreting 4D tumour spheroid experiments |
title | Designing and interpreting 4D tumour spheroid experiments |
title_full | Designing and interpreting 4D tumour spheroid experiments |
title_fullStr | Designing and interpreting 4D tumour spheroid experiments |
title_full_unstemmed | Designing and interpreting 4D tumour spheroid experiments |
title_short | Designing and interpreting 4D tumour spheroid experiments |
title_sort | designing and interpreting 4d tumour spheroid experiments |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8786869/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35075254 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s42003-022-03018-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT murphyryanj designingandinterpreting4dtumourspheroidexperiments AT browningalexanderp designingandinterpreting4dtumourspheroidexperiments AT gunasinghgency designingandinterpreting4dtumourspheroidexperiments AT haassnikolask designingandinterpreting4dtumourspheroidexperiments AT simpsonmatthewj designingandinterpreting4dtumourspheroidexperiments |