Cargando…

Validation and test–retest repeatability performance of parametric methods for [(11)C]UCB-J PET

[(11)C]UCB-J is a PET radioligand that binds to the presynaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A. Therefore, [(11)C]UCB-J PET may serve as an in vivo marker of synaptic integrity. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the quantitative accuracy and the 28-day test–retest repeatability (TRT) of vari...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tuncel, Hayel, Boellaard, Ronald, Coomans, Emma M., Hollander-Meeuwsen, Marijke den, de Vries, Erik F. J., Glaudemans, Andor W. J. M., Feltes, Paula Kopschina, García, David Vállez, Verfaillie, Sander C. J., Wolters, Emma E., Sweeney, Steven P., Ryan, J. Michael, Ivarsson, Magnus, Lynch, Berkley A., Schober, Patrick, Scheltens, Philip, Schuit, Robert C., Windhorst, Albert D., De Deyn, Peter P., van Berckel, Bart N. M., Golla, Sandeep S. V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8786991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35072802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-021-00874-8
_version_ 1784639263312183296
author Tuncel, Hayel
Boellaard, Ronald
Coomans, Emma M.
Hollander-Meeuwsen, Marijke den
de Vries, Erik F. J.
Glaudemans, Andor W. J. M.
Feltes, Paula Kopschina
García, David Vállez
Verfaillie, Sander C. J.
Wolters, Emma E.
Sweeney, Steven P.
Ryan, J. Michael
Ivarsson, Magnus
Lynch, Berkley A.
Schober, Patrick
Scheltens, Philip
Schuit, Robert C.
Windhorst, Albert D.
De Deyn, Peter P.
van Berckel, Bart N. M.
Golla, Sandeep S. V.
author_facet Tuncel, Hayel
Boellaard, Ronald
Coomans, Emma M.
Hollander-Meeuwsen, Marijke den
de Vries, Erik F. J.
Glaudemans, Andor W. J. M.
Feltes, Paula Kopschina
García, David Vállez
Verfaillie, Sander C. J.
Wolters, Emma E.
Sweeney, Steven P.
Ryan, J. Michael
Ivarsson, Magnus
Lynch, Berkley A.
Schober, Patrick
Scheltens, Philip
Schuit, Robert C.
Windhorst, Albert D.
De Deyn, Peter P.
van Berckel, Bart N. M.
Golla, Sandeep S. V.
author_sort Tuncel, Hayel
collection PubMed
description [(11)C]UCB-J is a PET radioligand that binds to the presynaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A. Therefore, [(11)C]UCB-J PET may serve as an in vivo marker of synaptic integrity. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the quantitative accuracy and the 28-day test–retest repeatability (TRT) of various parametric quantitative methods for dynamic [(11)C]UCB-J studies in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients and healthy controls (HC). Eight HCs and seven AD patients underwent two 60-min dynamic [(11)C]UCB-J PET scans with arterial sampling over a 28-day interval. Several plasma-input based and reference-region based parametric methods were used to generate parametric images using metabolite corrected plasma activity as input function or white matter semi-ovale as reference region. Different parametric outcomes were compared regionally with corresponding non-linear regression (NLR) estimates. Furthermore, the 28-day TRT was assessed for all parametric methods. Spectral analysis (SA) and Logan graphical analysis showed high correlations with NLR estimates. Receptor parametric mapping (RPM) and simplified reference tissue model 2 (SRTM2) BP(ND), and reference Logan (RLogan) distribution volume ratio (DVR) regional estimates correlated well with plasma-input derived DVR and SRTM BP(ND). Among the multilinear reference tissue model (MRTM) methods, MRTM1 had the best correspondence with DVR and SRTM BP(ND). Among the parametric methods evaluated, spectral analysis (SA) and SRTM2 were the best plasma-input and reference tissue methods, respectively, to obtain quantitatively accurate and repeatable parametric images for dynamic [(11)C]UCB-J PET. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13550-021-00874-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8786991
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87869912022-02-02 Validation and test–retest repeatability performance of parametric methods for [(11)C]UCB-J PET Tuncel, Hayel Boellaard, Ronald Coomans, Emma M. Hollander-Meeuwsen, Marijke den de Vries, Erik F. J. Glaudemans, Andor W. J. M. Feltes, Paula Kopschina García, David Vállez Verfaillie, Sander C. J. Wolters, Emma E. Sweeney, Steven P. Ryan, J. Michael Ivarsson, Magnus Lynch, Berkley A. Schober, Patrick Scheltens, Philip Schuit, Robert C. Windhorst, Albert D. De Deyn, Peter P. van Berckel, Bart N. M. Golla, Sandeep S. V. EJNMMI Res Original Research [(11)C]UCB-J is a PET radioligand that binds to the presynaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A. Therefore, [(11)C]UCB-J PET may serve as an in vivo marker of synaptic integrity. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the quantitative accuracy and the 28-day test–retest repeatability (TRT) of various parametric quantitative methods for dynamic [(11)C]UCB-J studies in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients and healthy controls (HC). Eight HCs and seven AD patients underwent two 60-min dynamic [(11)C]UCB-J PET scans with arterial sampling over a 28-day interval. Several plasma-input based and reference-region based parametric methods were used to generate parametric images using metabolite corrected plasma activity as input function or white matter semi-ovale as reference region. Different parametric outcomes were compared regionally with corresponding non-linear regression (NLR) estimates. Furthermore, the 28-day TRT was assessed for all parametric methods. Spectral analysis (SA) and Logan graphical analysis showed high correlations with NLR estimates. Receptor parametric mapping (RPM) and simplified reference tissue model 2 (SRTM2) BP(ND), and reference Logan (RLogan) distribution volume ratio (DVR) regional estimates correlated well with plasma-input derived DVR and SRTM BP(ND). Among the multilinear reference tissue model (MRTM) methods, MRTM1 had the best correspondence with DVR and SRTM BP(ND). Among the parametric methods evaluated, spectral analysis (SA) and SRTM2 were the best plasma-input and reference tissue methods, respectively, to obtain quantitatively accurate and repeatable parametric images for dynamic [(11)C]UCB-J PET. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13550-021-00874-8. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8786991/ /pubmed/35072802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-021-00874-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Tuncel, Hayel
Boellaard, Ronald
Coomans, Emma M.
Hollander-Meeuwsen, Marijke den
de Vries, Erik F. J.
Glaudemans, Andor W. J. M.
Feltes, Paula Kopschina
García, David Vállez
Verfaillie, Sander C. J.
Wolters, Emma E.
Sweeney, Steven P.
Ryan, J. Michael
Ivarsson, Magnus
Lynch, Berkley A.
Schober, Patrick
Scheltens, Philip
Schuit, Robert C.
Windhorst, Albert D.
De Deyn, Peter P.
van Berckel, Bart N. M.
Golla, Sandeep S. V.
Validation and test–retest repeatability performance of parametric methods for [(11)C]UCB-J PET
title Validation and test–retest repeatability performance of parametric methods for [(11)C]UCB-J PET
title_full Validation and test–retest repeatability performance of parametric methods for [(11)C]UCB-J PET
title_fullStr Validation and test–retest repeatability performance of parametric methods for [(11)C]UCB-J PET
title_full_unstemmed Validation and test–retest repeatability performance of parametric methods for [(11)C]UCB-J PET
title_short Validation and test–retest repeatability performance of parametric methods for [(11)C]UCB-J PET
title_sort validation and test–retest repeatability performance of parametric methods for [(11)c]ucb-j pet
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8786991/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35072802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-021-00874-8
work_keys_str_mv AT tuncelhayel validationandtestretestrepeatabilityperformanceofparametricmethodsfor11cucbjpet
AT boellaardronald validationandtestretestrepeatabilityperformanceofparametricmethodsfor11cucbjpet
AT coomansemmam validationandtestretestrepeatabilityperformanceofparametricmethodsfor11cucbjpet
AT hollandermeeuwsenmarijkeden validationandtestretestrepeatabilityperformanceofparametricmethodsfor11cucbjpet
AT devrieserikfj validationandtestretestrepeatabilityperformanceofparametricmethodsfor11cucbjpet
AT glaudemansandorwjm validationandtestretestrepeatabilityperformanceofparametricmethodsfor11cucbjpet
AT feltespaulakopschina validationandtestretestrepeatabilityperformanceofparametricmethodsfor11cucbjpet
AT garciadavidvallez validationandtestretestrepeatabilityperformanceofparametricmethodsfor11cucbjpet
AT verfailliesandercj validationandtestretestrepeatabilityperformanceofparametricmethodsfor11cucbjpet
AT woltersemmae validationandtestretestrepeatabilityperformanceofparametricmethodsfor11cucbjpet
AT sweeneystevenp validationandtestretestrepeatabilityperformanceofparametricmethodsfor11cucbjpet
AT ryanjmichael validationandtestretestrepeatabilityperformanceofparametricmethodsfor11cucbjpet
AT ivarssonmagnus validationandtestretestrepeatabilityperformanceofparametricmethodsfor11cucbjpet
AT lynchberkleya validationandtestretestrepeatabilityperformanceofparametricmethodsfor11cucbjpet
AT schoberpatrick validationandtestretestrepeatabilityperformanceofparametricmethodsfor11cucbjpet
AT scheltensphilip validationandtestretestrepeatabilityperformanceofparametricmethodsfor11cucbjpet
AT schuitrobertc validationandtestretestrepeatabilityperformanceofparametricmethodsfor11cucbjpet
AT windhorstalbertd validationandtestretestrepeatabilityperformanceofparametricmethodsfor11cucbjpet
AT dedeynpeterp validationandtestretestrepeatabilityperformanceofparametricmethodsfor11cucbjpet
AT vanberckelbartnm validationandtestretestrepeatabilityperformanceofparametricmethodsfor11cucbjpet
AT gollasandeepsv validationandtestretestrepeatabilityperformanceofparametricmethodsfor11cucbjpet