Cargando…

Assessment of the control measures of category A diseases of the Animal Health Law: Infection with rinderpest virus (Rinderpest)

EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases ('Animal Health Law’). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions where...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nielsen, Søren Saxmose, Alvarez, Julio, Bicout, Dominique Joseph, Calistri, Paolo, Canali, Elisabetta, Drewe, Julian Ashley, Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno, Gonzales Rojas, José Luis, Gortázar, Christian, Herskin, Mette, Michel, Virginie, Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel, Padalino, Barbara, Pasquali, Paolo, Spoolder, Hans, Ståhl, Karl, Velarde, Antonio, Viltrop, Arvo, Winckler, Christoph, De Clercq, Kris, Gubbins, Simon, Libeau, Genevieve, Gervelmeyer, Andrea, Roberts, Helen Clare
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8787597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35106093
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7071
_version_ 1784639392784056320
author Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
Alvarez, Julio
Bicout, Dominique Joseph
Calistri, Paolo
Canali, Elisabetta
Drewe, Julian Ashley
Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno
Gonzales Rojas, José Luis
Gortázar, Christian
Herskin, Mette
Michel, Virginie
Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel
Padalino, Barbara
Pasquali, Paolo
Spoolder, Hans
Ståhl, Karl
Velarde, Antonio
Viltrop, Arvo
Winckler, Christoph
De Clercq, Kris
Gubbins, Simon
Libeau, Genevieve
Gervelmeyer, Andrea
Roberts, Helen Clare
author_facet Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
Alvarez, Julio
Bicout, Dominique Joseph
Calistri, Paolo
Canali, Elisabetta
Drewe, Julian Ashley
Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno
Gonzales Rojas, José Luis
Gortázar, Christian
Herskin, Mette
Michel, Virginie
Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel
Padalino, Barbara
Pasquali, Paolo
Spoolder, Hans
Ståhl, Karl
Velarde, Antonio
Viltrop, Arvo
Winckler, Christoph
De Clercq, Kris
Gubbins, Simon
Libeau, Genevieve
Gervelmeyer, Andrea
Roberts, Helen Clare
collection PubMed
description EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases ('Animal Health Law’). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions where these control measures are assessed, with this opinion covering the assessment of control measures for rinderpest (RP), the only animal disease to have been globally eradicated. In this opinion, the AHAW Panel reviewed the effectiveness of: (i) clinical and laboratory sampling procedures, (ii) monitoring period and (iii) the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zone, and the minimum length of time the measures should be applied in these zones. The general methodology used for this series of opinions has been published elsewhere. The transmission kernels used for the assessment of the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zones are shown. Several scenarios for which control measures had to be assessed were agreed prior to the assessment. Considering that RP has been eradicated globally, a re‐emergence that is not stopped in its early phases could have a devastating impact on animal health and the economy. The panel concludes that no suitable strategies are available to entirely mitigate the risk associated with granting derogations from killing of animals in an affected establishment or for animal movements. Therefore, the panel recommends to not grant any derogations. The monitoring period of 21 days was assessed as effective, except for the hypothetical first re‐emergence of RP, when lack of awareness and diagnostic capability may extend the time to detection. It was concluded that the protection and the surveillance zones would contain 90% and > 99%, respectively, of the infections from an affected establishment. Enlarging the protection zone to 4 km would contain the disease spread with 95% probability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8787597
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87875972022-01-31 Assessment of the control measures of category A diseases of the Animal Health Law: Infection with rinderpest virus (Rinderpest) Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Alvarez, Julio Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Canali, Elisabetta Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, José Luis Gortázar, Christian Herskin, Mette Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Padalino, Barbara Pasquali, Paolo Spoolder, Hans Ståhl, Karl Velarde, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Winckler, Christoph De Clercq, Kris Gubbins, Simon Libeau, Genevieve Gervelmeyer, Andrea Roberts, Helen Clare EFSA J Scientific Opinion EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases ('Animal Health Law’). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions where these control measures are assessed, with this opinion covering the assessment of control measures for rinderpest (RP), the only animal disease to have been globally eradicated. In this opinion, the AHAW Panel reviewed the effectiveness of: (i) clinical and laboratory sampling procedures, (ii) monitoring period and (iii) the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zone, and the minimum length of time the measures should be applied in these zones. The general methodology used for this series of opinions has been published elsewhere. The transmission kernels used for the assessment of the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zones are shown. Several scenarios for which control measures had to be assessed were agreed prior to the assessment. Considering that RP has been eradicated globally, a re‐emergence that is not stopped in its early phases could have a devastating impact on animal health and the economy. The panel concludes that no suitable strategies are available to entirely mitigate the risk associated with granting derogations from killing of animals in an affected establishment or for animal movements. Therefore, the panel recommends to not grant any derogations. The monitoring period of 21 days was assessed as effective, except for the hypothetical first re‐emergence of RP, when lack of awareness and diagnostic capability may extend the time to detection. It was concluded that the protection and the surveillance zones would contain 90% and > 99%, respectively, of the infections from an affected establishment. Enlarging the protection zone to 4 km would contain the disease spread with 95% probability. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8787597/ /pubmed/35106093 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7071 Text en © 2022 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
Alvarez, Julio
Bicout, Dominique Joseph
Calistri, Paolo
Canali, Elisabetta
Drewe, Julian Ashley
Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno
Gonzales Rojas, José Luis
Gortázar, Christian
Herskin, Mette
Michel, Virginie
Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel
Padalino, Barbara
Pasquali, Paolo
Spoolder, Hans
Ståhl, Karl
Velarde, Antonio
Viltrop, Arvo
Winckler, Christoph
De Clercq, Kris
Gubbins, Simon
Libeau, Genevieve
Gervelmeyer, Andrea
Roberts, Helen Clare
Assessment of the control measures of category A diseases of the Animal Health Law: Infection with rinderpest virus (Rinderpest)
title Assessment of the control measures of category A diseases of the Animal Health Law: Infection with rinderpest virus (Rinderpest)
title_full Assessment of the control measures of category A diseases of the Animal Health Law: Infection with rinderpest virus (Rinderpest)
title_fullStr Assessment of the control measures of category A diseases of the Animal Health Law: Infection with rinderpest virus (Rinderpest)
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the control measures of category A diseases of the Animal Health Law: Infection with rinderpest virus (Rinderpest)
title_short Assessment of the control measures of category A diseases of the Animal Health Law: Infection with rinderpest virus (Rinderpest)
title_sort assessment of the control measures of category a diseases of the animal health law: infection with rinderpest virus (rinderpest)
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8787597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35106093
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7071
work_keys_str_mv AT assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofcategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawinfectionwithrinderpestvirusrinderpest
AT nielsensørensaxmose assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofcategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawinfectionwithrinderpestvirusrinderpest
AT alvarezjulio assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofcategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawinfectionwithrinderpestvirusrinderpest
AT bicoutdominiquejoseph assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofcategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawinfectionwithrinderpestvirusrinderpest
AT calistripaolo assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofcategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawinfectionwithrinderpestvirusrinderpest
AT canalielisabetta assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofcategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawinfectionwithrinderpestvirusrinderpest
AT drewejulianashley assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofcategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawinfectionwithrinderpestvirusrinderpest
AT garinbastujibruno assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofcategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawinfectionwithrinderpestvirusrinderpest
AT gonzalesrojasjoseluis assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofcategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawinfectionwithrinderpestvirusrinderpest
AT gortazarchristian assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofcategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawinfectionwithrinderpestvirusrinderpest
AT herskinmette assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofcategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawinfectionwithrinderpestvirusrinderpest
AT michelvirginie assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofcategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawinfectionwithrinderpestvirusrinderpest
AT mirandachuecamiguelangel assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofcategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawinfectionwithrinderpestvirusrinderpest
AT padalinobarbara assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofcategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawinfectionwithrinderpestvirusrinderpest
AT pasqualipaolo assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofcategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawinfectionwithrinderpestvirusrinderpest
AT spoolderhans assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofcategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawinfectionwithrinderpestvirusrinderpest
AT stahlkarl assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofcategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawinfectionwithrinderpestvirusrinderpest
AT velardeantonio assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofcategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawinfectionwithrinderpestvirusrinderpest
AT viltroparvo assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofcategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawinfectionwithrinderpestvirusrinderpest
AT wincklerchristoph assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofcategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawinfectionwithrinderpestvirusrinderpest
AT declercqkris assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofcategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawinfectionwithrinderpestvirusrinderpest
AT gubbinssimon assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofcategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawinfectionwithrinderpestvirusrinderpest
AT libeaugenevieve assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofcategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawinfectionwithrinderpestvirusrinderpest
AT gervelmeyerandrea assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofcategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawinfectionwithrinderpestvirusrinderpest
AT robertshelenclare assessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofcategoryadiseasesoftheanimalhealthlawinfectionwithrinderpestvirusrinderpest