Cargando…

Short-Term and Long-Term Renal Outcomes in Patients With Obesity After Minimally Invasive Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy for the Treatment of Renal Cancer: Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND: Obesity is significantly associated with renal cell carcinoma. Surgery is the preferred treatment for demarcated lesions of renal cell carcinoma; however, obesity increases the complexity of surgical outcomes. Minimally invasive surgical techniques are preferred over open partial nephrec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Flippo, Brittany, Stone, Bradley, Stahr, Shelbie, Khalil, Mahmoud, Davis, Rodney, Kamel, Mohamed, Singh, Manisha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8787657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35006078
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/19750
_version_ 1784639405064978432
author Flippo, Brittany
Stone, Bradley
Stahr, Shelbie
Khalil, Mahmoud
Davis, Rodney
Kamel, Mohamed
Singh, Manisha
author_facet Flippo, Brittany
Stone, Bradley
Stahr, Shelbie
Khalil, Mahmoud
Davis, Rodney
Kamel, Mohamed
Singh, Manisha
author_sort Flippo, Brittany
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Obesity is significantly associated with renal cell carcinoma. Surgery is the preferred treatment for demarcated lesions of renal cell carcinoma; however, obesity increases the complexity of surgical outcomes. Minimally invasive surgical techniques are preferred over open partial nephrectomy (OPN), but controversy remains regarding the most efficacious technique in patients with obesity. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine whether minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (MIPN) or OPN better preserves renal function and investigate short- and long-term renal outcomes in patients with obesity undergoing a partial nephrectomy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 242 adult patients aged ≥18 years who underwent MIPN or OPN between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2016, at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences. Using creatinine as a measure of kidney function, patients’ preoperative levels were compared with their postoperative levels in 2-time frames: short (3-6 months postsurgery) or long (>6 months). The primary outcome was the change in creatinine values from preoperative to >6 months postoperatively in patients with obesity. Secondary outcomes included the change in creatinine values from preoperative to 3 to 6 months postoperatively in patients with obesity who underwent MIPN versus OPN. We also analyzed the creatinine values of nonobese patients (BMI <30) who underwent partial nephrectomy using the same time frames. Unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate crude and multivariable-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CI to observe associations between surgery type and changes in creatinine values from while stratifying for obesity. RESULTS: A total of 140 patients were included in the study, of whom 75 were obese and 65 were nonobese. At >6 months after MIPN (n=20), the odds of patients with obesity having a decrease or no change in creatinine values was 1.24 times higher than those who had OPN (n=13; OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.299-6.729; P=.80). At 3 to 6 months after MIPN (n=27), the odds were 0.62 times lower than those after OPN (n=17; OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.140-2.753; P=.56). In the nonobese group, at 3 to 6 months after undergoing minimally invasive surgery (n=18), the odds of having a decrease or no change in creatinine values was 4.86 times higher than those who had open surgery (n=21; OR 4.86, 95% CI 1.085-21.809; P=.04). At more than 6 months after MIPN (n=14), the odds were 4.13 times higher than those after OPN (n=11; OR 4.13, 95% CI 0.579-29.485; P=.16). CONCLUSIONS: We observed a nonstatistically significant preservation of renal function in patients with obesity who underwent OPN at 3 to 6 months postoperatively. Conversely, after 6 months, the same was true for MIPN, indicating the long-term benefit of MIPN. In the nonobese group, MIPN was favored over OPN. 
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8787657
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87876572022-02-03 Short-Term and Long-Term Renal Outcomes in Patients With Obesity After Minimally Invasive Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy for the Treatment of Renal Cancer: Retrospective Study Flippo, Brittany Stone, Bradley Stahr, Shelbie Khalil, Mahmoud Davis, Rodney Kamel, Mohamed Singh, Manisha JMIR Form Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Obesity is significantly associated with renal cell carcinoma. Surgery is the preferred treatment for demarcated lesions of renal cell carcinoma; however, obesity increases the complexity of surgical outcomes. Minimally invasive surgical techniques are preferred over open partial nephrectomy (OPN), but controversy remains regarding the most efficacious technique in patients with obesity. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine whether minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (MIPN) or OPN better preserves renal function and investigate short- and long-term renal outcomes in patients with obesity undergoing a partial nephrectomy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of 242 adult patients aged ≥18 years who underwent MIPN or OPN between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2016, at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences. Using creatinine as a measure of kidney function, patients’ preoperative levels were compared with their postoperative levels in 2-time frames: short (3-6 months postsurgery) or long (>6 months). The primary outcome was the change in creatinine values from preoperative to >6 months postoperatively in patients with obesity. Secondary outcomes included the change in creatinine values from preoperative to 3 to 6 months postoperatively in patients with obesity who underwent MIPN versus OPN. We also analyzed the creatinine values of nonobese patients (BMI <30) who underwent partial nephrectomy using the same time frames. Unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate crude and multivariable-adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CI to observe associations between surgery type and changes in creatinine values from while stratifying for obesity. RESULTS: A total of 140 patients were included in the study, of whom 75 were obese and 65 were nonobese. At >6 months after MIPN (n=20), the odds of patients with obesity having a decrease or no change in creatinine values was 1.24 times higher than those who had OPN (n=13; OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.299-6.729; P=.80). At 3 to 6 months after MIPN (n=27), the odds were 0.62 times lower than those after OPN (n=17; OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.140-2.753; P=.56). In the nonobese group, at 3 to 6 months after undergoing minimally invasive surgery (n=18), the odds of having a decrease or no change in creatinine values was 4.86 times higher than those who had open surgery (n=21; OR 4.86, 95% CI 1.085-21.809; P=.04). At more than 6 months after MIPN (n=14), the odds were 4.13 times higher than those after OPN (n=11; OR 4.13, 95% CI 0.579-29.485; P=.16). CONCLUSIONS: We observed a nonstatistically significant preservation of renal function in patients with obesity who underwent OPN at 3 to 6 months postoperatively. Conversely, after 6 months, the same was true for MIPN, indicating the long-term benefit of MIPN. In the nonobese group, MIPN was favored over OPN.  JMIR Publications 2022-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8787657/ /pubmed/35006078 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/19750 Text en ©Brittany Flippo, Bradley Stone, Shelbie Stahr, Mahmoud Khalil, Rodney Davis, Mohamed Kamel, Manisha Singh. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 10.01.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Formative Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://formative.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Flippo, Brittany
Stone, Bradley
Stahr, Shelbie
Khalil, Mahmoud
Davis, Rodney
Kamel, Mohamed
Singh, Manisha
Short-Term and Long-Term Renal Outcomes in Patients With Obesity After Minimally Invasive Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy for the Treatment of Renal Cancer: Retrospective Study
title Short-Term and Long-Term Renal Outcomes in Patients With Obesity After Minimally Invasive Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy for the Treatment of Renal Cancer: Retrospective Study
title_full Short-Term and Long-Term Renal Outcomes in Patients With Obesity After Minimally Invasive Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy for the Treatment of Renal Cancer: Retrospective Study
title_fullStr Short-Term and Long-Term Renal Outcomes in Patients With Obesity After Minimally Invasive Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy for the Treatment of Renal Cancer: Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed Short-Term and Long-Term Renal Outcomes in Patients With Obesity After Minimally Invasive Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy for the Treatment of Renal Cancer: Retrospective Study
title_short Short-Term and Long-Term Renal Outcomes in Patients With Obesity After Minimally Invasive Versus Open Partial Nephrectomy for the Treatment of Renal Cancer: Retrospective Study
title_sort short-term and long-term renal outcomes in patients with obesity after minimally invasive versus open partial nephrectomy for the treatment of renal cancer: retrospective study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8787657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35006078
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/19750
work_keys_str_mv AT flippobrittany shorttermandlongtermrenaloutcomesinpatientswithobesityafterminimallyinvasiveversusopenpartialnephrectomyforthetreatmentofrenalcancerretrospectivestudy
AT stonebradley shorttermandlongtermrenaloutcomesinpatientswithobesityafterminimallyinvasiveversusopenpartialnephrectomyforthetreatmentofrenalcancerretrospectivestudy
AT stahrshelbie shorttermandlongtermrenaloutcomesinpatientswithobesityafterminimallyinvasiveversusopenpartialnephrectomyforthetreatmentofrenalcancerretrospectivestudy
AT khalilmahmoud shorttermandlongtermrenaloutcomesinpatientswithobesityafterminimallyinvasiveversusopenpartialnephrectomyforthetreatmentofrenalcancerretrospectivestudy
AT davisrodney shorttermandlongtermrenaloutcomesinpatientswithobesityafterminimallyinvasiveversusopenpartialnephrectomyforthetreatmentofrenalcancerretrospectivestudy
AT kamelmohamed shorttermandlongtermrenaloutcomesinpatientswithobesityafterminimallyinvasiveversusopenpartialnephrectomyforthetreatmentofrenalcancerretrospectivestudy
AT singhmanisha shorttermandlongtermrenaloutcomesinpatientswithobesityafterminimallyinvasiveversusopenpartialnephrectomyforthetreatmentofrenalcancerretrospectivestudy