Cargando…
Equal access to healthcare in national legislations: how do Croatia, Germany, Poland, and Slovenia counteract discrimination in healthcare?
BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was a comparative analysis of legislative measures against discrimination in healthcare on the grounds of a) race and ethnicity, b) religion and belief, and c) gender identity and sexual orientation in Croatia, Germany, Poland and Slovenia. METHODS: We conducted a se...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8787875/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35073881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07453-6 |
_version_ | 1784639439605071872 |
---|---|
author | Bielińska, Katarzyna Chowaniec, Anna Doričić, Robert Nowak, Marianne Orzechowski, Marcin Ramšak, Mojca Łuków, Paweł Muzur, Amir Zupanič-Slavec, Zvonka Steger, Florian |
author_facet | Bielińska, Katarzyna Chowaniec, Anna Doričić, Robert Nowak, Marianne Orzechowski, Marcin Ramšak, Mojca Łuków, Paweł Muzur, Amir Zupanič-Slavec, Zvonka Steger, Florian |
author_sort | Bielińska, Katarzyna |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was a comparative analysis of legislative measures against discrimination in healthcare on the grounds of a) race and ethnicity, b) religion and belief, and c) gender identity and sexual orientation in Croatia, Germany, Poland and Slovenia. METHODS: We conducted a search for documents in national legal databases and reviewed legal commentaries, scientific literature and official reports of equality bodies. We integrated a comparative method with text analysis and the critical interpretive approach. The documents were examined in their original languages: Croatian, German, Polish, and Slovenian. RESULTS: All examined states prohibit discrimination and guarantee the right to healthcare on the constitutional level. However, there are significant differences among them on the statutory level, regarding both anti-discriminatory legal measures and other legislation affecting access to healthcare for groups of diverse race or ethnicity, religion or belief, sexual orientation or gender identity. Croatia and Slovenia show the most comprehensive legislation concerning non-discrimination in healthcare in comparison to Germany and even more Poland. Except for Slovenia, explicit provisions protecting equal access for members of the abovementioned groups are insufficiently represented in healthcare legislation. CONCLUSIONS: The study identified legislative barriers to access to healthcare for persons of diverse race or ethnicity, religion or belief, sexual orientation or gender identity in Croatia, Germany, Poland and Slovenia. The discrepancies in the level of implementation of anti-discriminatory measures among these states show that there is a need for comprehensive EU-wide regulations, which would implement the principle of equal treatment in the specific context of healthcare. General anti-discrimination regulations should be strengthened by inclusion of anti-discrimination provisions directly into national legislation relating specifically to the area of healthcare. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8787875 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87878752022-02-03 Equal access to healthcare in national legislations: how do Croatia, Germany, Poland, and Slovenia counteract discrimination in healthcare? Bielińska, Katarzyna Chowaniec, Anna Doričić, Robert Nowak, Marianne Orzechowski, Marcin Ramšak, Mojca Łuków, Paweł Muzur, Amir Zupanič-Slavec, Zvonka Steger, Florian BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was a comparative analysis of legislative measures against discrimination in healthcare on the grounds of a) race and ethnicity, b) religion and belief, and c) gender identity and sexual orientation in Croatia, Germany, Poland and Slovenia. METHODS: We conducted a search for documents in national legal databases and reviewed legal commentaries, scientific literature and official reports of equality bodies. We integrated a comparative method with text analysis and the critical interpretive approach. The documents were examined in their original languages: Croatian, German, Polish, and Slovenian. RESULTS: All examined states prohibit discrimination and guarantee the right to healthcare on the constitutional level. However, there are significant differences among them on the statutory level, regarding both anti-discriminatory legal measures and other legislation affecting access to healthcare for groups of diverse race or ethnicity, religion or belief, sexual orientation or gender identity. Croatia and Slovenia show the most comprehensive legislation concerning non-discrimination in healthcare in comparison to Germany and even more Poland. Except for Slovenia, explicit provisions protecting equal access for members of the abovementioned groups are insufficiently represented in healthcare legislation. CONCLUSIONS: The study identified legislative barriers to access to healthcare for persons of diverse race or ethnicity, religion or belief, sexual orientation or gender identity in Croatia, Germany, Poland and Slovenia. The discrepancies in the level of implementation of anti-discriminatory measures among these states show that there is a need for comprehensive EU-wide regulations, which would implement the principle of equal treatment in the specific context of healthcare. General anti-discrimination regulations should be strengthened by inclusion of anti-discrimination provisions directly into national legislation relating specifically to the area of healthcare. BioMed Central 2022-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8787875/ /pubmed/35073881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07453-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Bielińska, Katarzyna Chowaniec, Anna Doričić, Robert Nowak, Marianne Orzechowski, Marcin Ramšak, Mojca Łuków, Paweł Muzur, Amir Zupanič-Slavec, Zvonka Steger, Florian Equal access to healthcare in national legislations: how do Croatia, Germany, Poland, and Slovenia counteract discrimination in healthcare? |
title | Equal access to healthcare in national legislations: how do Croatia, Germany, Poland, and Slovenia counteract discrimination in healthcare? |
title_full | Equal access to healthcare in national legislations: how do Croatia, Germany, Poland, and Slovenia counteract discrimination in healthcare? |
title_fullStr | Equal access to healthcare in national legislations: how do Croatia, Germany, Poland, and Slovenia counteract discrimination in healthcare? |
title_full_unstemmed | Equal access to healthcare in national legislations: how do Croatia, Germany, Poland, and Slovenia counteract discrimination in healthcare? |
title_short | Equal access to healthcare in national legislations: how do Croatia, Germany, Poland, and Slovenia counteract discrimination in healthcare? |
title_sort | equal access to healthcare in national legislations: how do croatia, germany, poland, and slovenia counteract discrimination in healthcare? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8787875/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35073881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07453-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bielinskakatarzyna equalaccesstohealthcareinnationallegislationshowdocroatiagermanypolandandsloveniacounteractdiscriminationinhealthcare AT chowaniecanna equalaccesstohealthcareinnationallegislationshowdocroatiagermanypolandandsloveniacounteractdiscriminationinhealthcare AT doricicrobert equalaccesstohealthcareinnationallegislationshowdocroatiagermanypolandandsloveniacounteractdiscriminationinhealthcare AT nowakmarianne equalaccesstohealthcareinnationallegislationshowdocroatiagermanypolandandsloveniacounteractdiscriminationinhealthcare AT orzechowskimarcin equalaccesstohealthcareinnationallegislationshowdocroatiagermanypolandandsloveniacounteractdiscriminationinhealthcare AT ramsakmojca equalaccesstohealthcareinnationallegislationshowdocroatiagermanypolandandsloveniacounteractdiscriminationinhealthcare AT łukowpaweł equalaccesstohealthcareinnationallegislationshowdocroatiagermanypolandandsloveniacounteractdiscriminationinhealthcare AT muzuramir equalaccesstohealthcareinnationallegislationshowdocroatiagermanypolandandsloveniacounteractdiscriminationinhealthcare AT zupanicslaveczvonka equalaccesstohealthcareinnationallegislationshowdocroatiagermanypolandandsloveniacounteractdiscriminationinhealthcare AT stegerflorian equalaccesstohealthcareinnationallegislationshowdocroatiagermanypolandandsloveniacounteractdiscriminationinhealthcare |