Cargando…

A machine learning approach for modeling decisions in the out of hospital cardiac arrest care workflow

BACKGROUND: A growing body of research has shown that machine learning (ML) can be a useful tool to predict how different variable combinations affect out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survival outcomes. However, there remain significant research gaps on the utilization of ML models for decision...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harford, Samuel, Del Rios, Marina, Heinert, Sara, Weber, Joseph, Markul, Eddie, Tataris, Katie, Campbell, Teri, Vanden Hoek, Terry, Darabi, Houshang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8787933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35078470
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01730-4
_version_ 1784639451093270528
author Harford, Samuel
Del Rios, Marina
Heinert, Sara
Weber, Joseph
Markul, Eddie
Tataris, Katie
Campbell, Teri
Vanden Hoek, Terry
Darabi, Houshang
author_facet Harford, Samuel
Del Rios, Marina
Heinert, Sara
Weber, Joseph
Markul, Eddie
Tataris, Katie
Campbell, Teri
Vanden Hoek, Terry
Darabi, Houshang
author_sort Harford, Samuel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A growing body of research has shown that machine learning (ML) can be a useful tool to predict how different variable combinations affect out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survival outcomes. However, there remain significant research gaps on the utilization of ML models for decision-making and their impact on survival outcomes. The purpose of this study was to develop ML models that effectively predict hospital’s practice to perform coronary angiography (CA) in adult patients after OHCA and subsequent neurologic outcomes. METHODS: We utilized all (N = 2398) patients treated by the Chicago Fire Department Emergency Medical Services included in the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES) between 2013 and 2018 who survived to hospital admission to develop, test, and analyze ML models for decisions after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and patient survival. ML classification models, including the Embedded Fully Convolutional Network (EFCN) model, were compared based on their ability to predict post-ROSC decisions and survival. RESULTS: The EFCN classification model achieved the best results across tested ML algorithms. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for CA and Survival were 0.908 and 0.896 respectively. Through cohort analyses, our model predicts that 18.3% (CI 16.4–20.2) of patients should receive a CA that did not originally, and 30.1% (CI 28.5–31.7) of these would experience improved survival outcomes. CONCLUSION: ML modeling effectively predicted hospital decisions and neurologic outcomes. ML modeling may serve as a quality improvement tool to inform system level OHCA policies and treatment protocols. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-021-01730-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8787933
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87879332022-02-03 A machine learning approach for modeling decisions in the out of hospital cardiac arrest care workflow Harford, Samuel Del Rios, Marina Heinert, Sara Weber, Joseph Markul, Eddie Tataris, Katie Campbell, Teri Vanden Hoek, Terry Darabi, Houshang BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research BACKGROUND: A growing body of research has shown that machine learning (ML) can be a useful tool to predict how different variable combinations affect out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survival outcomes. However, there remain significant research gaps on the utilization of ML models for decision-making and their impact on survival outcomes. The purpose of this study was to develop ML models that effectively predict hospital’s practice to perform coronary angiography (CA) in adult patients after OHCA and subsequent neurologic outcomes. METHODS: We utilized all (N = 2398) patients treated by the Chicago Fire Department Emergency Medical Services included in the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES) between 2013 and 2018 who survived to hospital admission to develop, test, and analyze ML models for decisions after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and patient survival. ML classification models, including the Embedded Fully Convolutional Network (EFCN) model, were compared based on their ability to predict post-ROSC decisions and survival. RESULTS: The EFCN classification model achieved the best results across tested ML algorithms. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for CA and Survival were 0.908 and 0.896 respectively. Through cohort analyses, our model predicts that 18.3% (CI 16.4–20.2) of patients should receive a CA that did not originally, and 30.1% (CI 28.5–31.7) of these would experience improved survival outcomes. CONCLUSION: ML modeling effectively predicted hospital decisions and neurologic outcomes. ML modeling may serve as a quality improvement tool to inform system level OHCA policies and treatment protocols. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12911-021-01730-4. BioMed Central 2022-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8787933/ /pubmed/35078470 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01730-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Harford, Samuel
Del Rios, Marina
Heinert, Sara
Weber, Joseph
Markul, Eddie
Tataris, Katie
Campbell, Teri
Vanden Hoek, Terry
Darabi, Houshang
A machine learning approach for modeling decisions in the out of hospital cardiac arrest care workflow
title A machine learning approach for modeling decisions in the out of hospital cardiac arrest care workflow
title_full A machine learning approach for modeling decisions in the out of hospital cardiac arrest care workflow
title_fullStr A machine learning approach for modeling decisions in the out of hospital cardiac arrest care workflow
title_full_unstemmed A machine learning approach for modeling decisions in the out of hospital cardiac arrest care workflow
title_short A machine learning approach for modeling decisions in the out of hospital cardiac arrest care workflow
title_sort machine learning approach for modeling decisions in the out of hospital cardiac arrest care workflow
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8787933/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35078470
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-021-01730-4
work_keys_str_mv AT harfordsamuel amachinelearningapproachformodelingdecisionsintheoutofhospitalcardiacarrestcareworkflow
AT delriosmarina amachinelearningapproachformodelingdecisionsintheoutofhospitalcardiacarrestcareworkflow
AT heinertsara amachinelearningapproachformodelingdecisionsintheoutofhospitalcardiacarrestcareworkflow
AT weberjoseph amachinelearningapproachformodelingdecisionsintheoutofhospitalcardiacarrestcareworkflow
AT markuleddie amachinelearningapproachformodelingdecisionsintheoutofhospitalcardiacarrestcareworkflow
AT tatariskatie amachinelearningapproachformodelingdecisionsintheoutofhospitalcardiacarrestcareworkflow
AT campbellteri amachinelearningapproachformodelingdecisionsintheoutofhospitalcardiacarrestcareworkflow
AT vandenhoekterry amachinelearningapproachformodelingdecisionsintheoutofhospitalcardiacarrestcareworkflow
AT darabihoushang amachinelearningapproachformodelingdecisionsintheoutofhospitalcardiacarrestcareworkflow
AT harfordsamuel machinelearningapproachformodelingdecisionsintheoutofhospitalcardiacarrestcareworkflow
AT delriosmarina machinelearningapproachformodelingdecisionsintheoutofhospitalcardiacarrestcareworkflow
AT heinertsara machinelearningapproachformodelingdecisionsintheoutofhospitalcardiacarrestcareworkflow
AT weberjoseph machinelearningapproachformodelingdecisionsintheoutofhospitalcardiacarrestcareworkflow
AT markuleddie machinelearningapproachformodelingdecisionsintheoutofhospitalcardiacarrestcareworkflow
AT tatariskatie machinelearningapproachformodelingdecisionsintheoutofhospitalcardiacarrestcareworkflow
AT campbellteri machinelearningapproachformodelingdecisionsintheoutofhospitalcardiacarrestcareworkflow
AT vandenhoekterry machinelearningapproachformodelingdecisionsintheoutofhospitalcardiacarrestcareworkflow
AT darabihoushang machinelearningapproachformodelingdecisionsintheoutofhospitalcardiacarrestcareworkflow