Cargando…

Prognostic impact of left atrial function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in sinus rhythm vs. persistent atrial fibrillation

AIMS: We sought to determine the prognostic impact of left atrial (LA) size and function in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in sinus rhythm (SR) vs. atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: We enrolled consecutive HFpEF patients and assessed indexed LA volu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schönbauer, Robert, Kammerlander, Andreas A., Duca, Franz, Aschauer, Stefan, Koschutnik, Matthias, Dona, Carolina, Nitsche, Christian, Loewe, Christian, Hengstenberg, Christian, Mascherbauer, Julia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8787979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34866363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13723
_version_ 1784639460245241856
author Schönbauer, Robert
Kammerlander, Andreas A.
Duca, Franz
Aschauer, Stefan
Koschutnik, Matthias
Dona, Carolina
Nitsche, Christian
Loewe, Christian
Hengstenberg, Christian
Mascherbauer, Julia
author_facet Schönbauer, Robert
Kammerlander, Andreas A.
Duca, Franz
Aschauer, Stefan
Koschutnik, Matthias
Dona, Carolina
Nitsche, Christian
Loewe, Christian
Hengstenberg, Christian
Mascherbauer, Julia
author_sort Schönbauer, Robert
collection PubMed
description AIMS: We sought to determine the prognostic impact of left atrial (LA) size and function in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in sinus rhythm (SR) vs. atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: We enrolled consecutive HFpEF patients and assessed indexed LA volumes and emptying fractions (LA‐EF) on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. In addition, all patients underwent right and left heart catheterization, 6 min walk test, and N‐terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide evaluation. We prospectively followed patients and used Cox regression models to determine the association of LA size and function with a composite endpoint of heart failure hospitalization and cardiovascular death. A total of 188 patients (71% female patients, 70 ± 8 years old) were included of whom 92 (49%) were in persistent AF. Sixty‐five patients reached the combined endpoint during a follow‐up of 31 (9–57) months. Multivariate Cox regression adjusted for established risk factors revealed that LA‐EF was significantly associated with outcome in patients in SR [adjusted hazard ratio 2.14; 95% confidence interval (1.32–3.47) per 1‐SD decline, P = 0.002]. In persistent AF, no LA imaging parameter was related to outcome. By receiver operating characteristic and restricted cubic spline analyses, we identified an LA‐EF ≥ 40% as best indicator for favourable outcomes in patients with HFpEF and SR. Persistent AF carried a similar risk for adverse outcome compared with impaired LA‐EF (<40%) in SR (log‐rank, P = 0.340). CONCLUSIONS: In HFpEF patients in SR, impaired LA‐EF is independently associated with worse cardiovascular outcome, which is similar to persistent AF. In persistent AF, LA parameters lose their prognostic ability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8787979
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87879792022-01-31 Prognostic impact of left atrial function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in sinus rhythm vs. persistent atrial fibrillation Schönbauer, Robert Kammerlander, Andreas A. Duca, Franz Aschauer, Stefan Koschutnik, Matthias Dona, Carolina Nitsche, Christian Loewe, Christian Hengstenberg, Christian Mascherbauer, Julia ESC Heart Fail Original Articles AIMS: We sought to determine the prognostic impact of left atrial (LA) size and function in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in sinus rhythm (SR) vs. atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: We enrolled consecutive HFpEF patients and assessed indexed LA volumes and emptying fractions (LA‐EF) on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. In addition, all patients underwent right and left heart catheterization, 6 min walk test, and N‐terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide evaluation. We prospectively followed patients and used Cox regression models to determine the association of LA size and function with a composite endpoint of heart failure hospitalization and cardiovascular death. A total of 188 patients (71% female patients, 70 ± 8 years old) were included of whom 92 (49%) were in persistent AF. Sixty‐five patients reached the combined endpoint during a follow‐up of 31 (9–57) months. Multivariate Cox regression adjusted for established risk factors revealed that LA‐EF was significantly associated with outcome in patients in SR [adjusted hazard ratio 2.14; 95% confidence interval (1.32–3.47) per 1‐SD decline, P = 0.002]. In persistent AF, no LA imaging parameter was related to outcome. By receiver operating characteristic and restricted cubic spline analyses, we identified an LA‐EF ≥ 40% as best indicator for favourable outcomes in patients with HFpEF and SR. Persistent AF carried a similar risk for adverse outcome compared with impaired LA‐EF (<40%) in SR (log‐rank, P = 0.340). CONCLUSIONS: In HFpEF patients in SR, impaired LA‐EF is independently associated with worse cardiovascular outcome, which is similar to persistent AF. In persistent AF, LA parameters lose their prognostic ability. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8787979/ /pubmed/34866363 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13723 Text en © 2021 The Authors. ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Schönbauer, Robert
Kammerlander, Andreas A.
Duca, Franz
Aschauer, Stefan
Koschutnik, Matthias
Dona, Carolina
Nitsche, Christian
Loewe, Christian
Hengstenberg, Christian
Mascherbauer, Julia
Prognostic impact of left atrial function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in sinus rhythm vs. persistent atrial fibrillation
title Prognostic impact of left atrial function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in sinus rhythm vs. persistent atrial fibrillation
title_full Prognostic impact of left atrial function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in sinus rhythm vs. persistent atrial fibrillation
title_fullStr Prognostic impact of left atrial function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in sinus rhythm vs. persistent atrial fibrillation
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic impact of left atrial function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in sinus rhythm vs. persistent atrial fibrillation
title_short Prognostic impact of left atrial function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in sinus rhythm vs. persistent atrial fibrillation
title_sort prognostic impact of left atrial function in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in sinus rhythm vs. persistent atrial fibrillation
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8787979/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34866363
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13723
work_keys_str_mv AT schonbauerrobert prognosticimpactofleftatrialfunctioninheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractioninsinusrhythmvspersistentatrialfibrillation
AT kammerlanderandreasa prognosticimpactofleftatrialfunctioninheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractioninsinusrhythmvspersistentatrialfibrillation
AT ducafranz prognosticimpactofleftatrialfunctioninheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractioninsinusrhythmvspersistentatrialfibrillation
AT aschauerstefan prognosticimpactofleftatrialfunctioninheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractioninsinusrhythmvspersistentatrialfibrillation
AT koschutnikmatthias prognosticimpactofleftatrialfunctioninheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractioninsinusrhythmvspersistentatrialfibrillation
AT donacarolina prognosticimpactofleftatrialfunctioninheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractioninsinusrhythmvspersistentatrialfibrillation
AT nitschechristian prognosticimpactofleftatrialfunctioninheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractioninsinusrhythmvspersistentatrialfibrillation
AT loewechristian prognosticimpactofleftatrialfunctioninheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractioninsinusrhythmvspersistentatrialfibrillation
AT hengstenbergchristian prognosticimpactofleftatrialfunctioninheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractioninsinusrhythmvspersistentatrialfibrillation
AT mascherbauerjulia prognosticimpactofleftatrialfunctioninheartfailurewithpreservedejectionfractioninsinusrhythmvspersistentatrialfibrillation