Cargando…

Prospective biomarker study in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: Cyto-C clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GBM) has a 5-year survival rate of 3%-5%. GBM treatment includes maximal resection followed by radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ). Cytochrome C oxidase (CcO) is a mitochondrial enzyme involved in the mechanism of resistance to TMZ. In a prior retr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Griguer, Corinne E, Oliva, Claudia R, Coffey, Christopher S, Cudkowicz, Merit E, Conwit, Robin A, Gudjonsdottir, Anna L, Ecklund, Dixie J, Fedler, Janel K, Neill-Hudson, Tina M, Nabors, Louis B, Benge, Melanie, Hackney, James R, Chase, Marianne, Leonard, Timothy P, Patel, Toral, Colman, Howard, de la Fuente, Macarena, Chaudhary, Rekha, Marder, Karen, Kreisl, Teri, Mohile, Nimish, Chheda, Milan G, McNeill, Katharine, Kumthekar, Priya, Dogan, Aclan, Drappatz, Jan, Puduvalli, Vinay, Kowalska, Agnes, Graber, Jerome, Gerstner, Elizabeth, Clark, Stephen, Salacz, Michael, Markert, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8788017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35088051
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdab186
_version_ 1784639468203933696
author Griguer, Corinne E
Oliva, Claudia R
Coffey, Christopher S
Cudkowicz, Merit E
Conwit, Robin A
Gudjonsdottir, Anna L
Ecklund, Dixie J
Fedler, Janel K
Neill-Hudson, Tina M
Nabors, Louis B
Benge, Melanie
Hackney, James R
Chase, Marianne
Leonard, Timothy P
Patel, Toral
Colman, Howard
de la Fuente, Macarena
Chaudhary, Rekha
Marder, Karen
Kreisl, Teri
Mohile, Nimish
Chheda, Milan G
McNeill, Katharine
Kumthekar, Priya
Dogan, Aclan
Drappatz, Jan
Puduvalli, Vinay
Kowalska, Agnes
Graber, Jerome
Gerstner, Elizabeth
Clark, Stephen
Salacz, Michael
Markert, James
author_facet Griguer, Corinne E
Oliva, Claudia R
Coffey, Christopher S
Cudkowicz, Merit E
Conwit, Robin A
Gudjonsdottir, Anna L
Ecklund, Dixie J
Fedler, Janel K
Neill-Hudson, Tina M
Nabors, Louis B
Benge, Melanie
Hackney, James R
Chase, Marianne
Leonard, Timothy P
Patel, Toral
Colman, Howard
de la Fuente, Macarena
Chaudhary, Rekha
Marder, Karen
Kreisl, Teri
Mohile, Nimish
Chheda, Milan G
McNeill, Katharine
Kumthekar, Priya
Dogan, Aclan
Drappatz, Jan
Puduvalli, Vinay
Kowalska, Agnes
Graber, Jerome
Gerstner, Elizabeth
Clark, Stephen
Salacz, Michael
Markert, James
author_sort Griguer, Corinne E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GBM) has a 5-year survival rate of 3%-5%. GBM treatment includes maximal resection followed by radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ). Cytochrome C oxidase (CcO) is a mitochondrial enzyme involved in the mechanism of resistance to TMZ. In a prior retrospective trial, CcO activity in GBMs inversely correlated with clinical outcome. The current Cyto-C study was designed to prospectively evaluate and validate the prognostic value of tumor CcO activity in patients with newly diagnosed primary GBM, and compared to the known prognostic value of MGMT promoter methylation status. METHODS: This multi-institutional, blinded, prospective biomarker study enrolled 152 patients with newly diagnosed GBM who were to undergo surgical resection and would be candidates for standard of care. The primary end point was overall survival (OS) time, and the secondary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) time. Tumor CcO activity and MGMT promoter methylation status were assayed in a centralized laboratory. RESULTS: OS and PFS did not differ by high or low tumor CcO activity, and the prognostic validity of MGMT promoter methylation was confirmed. Notably, a planned exploratory analysis suggested that the combination of low CcO activity and MGMT promoter methylation in tumors may be predictive of long-term survival. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor CcO activity alone was not confirmed as a prognostic marker in GBM patients. However, the combination of low CcO activity and methylated MGMT promoter may reveal a subgroup of GBM patients with improved long-term survival that warrants further evaluation. Our work also demonstrates the importance of performing large, multi-institutional, prospective studies to validate biomarkers. We also discuss lessons learned in assembling such studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8788017
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87880172022-01-26 Prospective biomarker study in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: Cyto-C clinical trial Griguer, Corinne E Oliva, Claudia R Coffey, Christopher S Cudkowicz, Merit E Conwit, Robin A Gudjonsdottir, Anna L Ecklund, Dixie J Fedler, Janel K Neill-Hudson, Tina M Nabors, Louis B Benge, Melanie Hackney, James R Chase, Marianne Leonard, Timothy P Patel, Toral Colman, Howard de la Fuente, Macarena Chaudhary, Rekha Marder, Karen Kreisl, Teri Mohile, Nimish Chheda, Milan G McNeill, Katharine Kumthekar, Priya Dogan, Aclan Drappatz, Jan Puduvalli, Vinay Kowalska, Agnes Graber, Jerome Gerstner, Elizabeth Clark, Stephen Salacz, Michael Markert, James Neurooncol Adv Clinical Investigations BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GBM) has a 5-year survival rate of 3%-5%. GBM treatment includes maximal resection followed by radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ). Cytochrome C oxidase (CcO) is a mitochondrial enzyme involved in the mechanism of resistance to TMZ. In a prior retrospective trial, CcO activity in GBMs inversely correlated with clinical outcome. The current Cyto-C study was designed to prospectively evaluate and validate the prognostic value of tumor CcO activity in patients with newly diagnosed primary GBM, and compared to the known prognostic value of MGMT promoter methylation status. METHODS: This multi-institutional, blinded, prospective biomarker study enrolled 152 patients with newly diagnosed GBM who were to undergo surgical resection and would be candidates for standard of care. The primary end point was overall survival (OS) time, and the secondary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) time. Tumor CcO activity and MGMT promoter methylation status were assayed in a centralized laboratory. RESULTS: OS and PFS did not differ by high or low tumor CcO activity, and the prognostic validity of MGMT promoter methylation was confirmed. Notably, a planned exploratory analysis suggested that the combination of low CcO activity and MGMT promoter methylation in tumors may be predictive of long-term survival. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor CcO activity alone was not confirmed as a prognostic marker in GBM patients. However, the combination of low CcO activity and methylated MGMT promoter may reveal a subgroup of GBM patients with improved long-term survival that warrants further evaluation. Our work also demonstrates the importance of performing large, multi-institutional, prospective studies to validate biomarkers. We also discuss lessons learned in assembling such studies. Oxford University Press 2021-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8788017/ /pubmed/35088051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdab186 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigations
Griguer, Corinne E
Oliva, Claudia R
Coffey, Christopher S
Cudkowicz, Merit E
Conwit, Robin A
Gudjonsdottir, Anna L
Ecklund, Dixie J
Fedler, Janel K
Neill-Hudson, Tina M
Nabors, Louis B
Benge, Melanie
Hackney, James R
Chase, Marianne
Leonard, Timothy P
Patel, Toral
Colman, Howard
de la Fuente, Macarena
Chaudhary, Rekha
Marder, Karen
Kreisl, Teri
Mohile, Nimish
Chheda, Milan G
McNeill, Katharine
Kumthekar, Priya
Dogan, Aclan
Drappatz, Jan
Puduvalli, Vinay
Kowalska, Agnes
Graber, Jerome
Gerstner, Elizabeth
Clark, Stephen
Salacz, Michael
Markert, James
Prospective biomarker study in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: Cyto-C clinical trial
title Prospective biomarker study in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: Cyto-C clinical trial
title_full Prospective biomarker study in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: Cyto-C clinical trial
title_fullStr Prospective biomarker study in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: Cyto-C clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Prospective biomarker study in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: Cyto-C clinical trial
title_short Prospective biomarker study in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: Cyto-C clinical trial
title_sort prospective biomarker study in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: cyto-c clinical trial
topic Clinical Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8788017/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35088051
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/noajnl/vdab186
work_keys_str_mv AT griguercorinnee prospectivebiomarkerstudyinnewlydiagnosedglioblastomacytocclinicaltrial
AT olivaclaudiar prospectivebiomarkerstudyinnewlydiagnosedglioblastomacytocclinicaltrial
AT coffeychristophers prospectivebiomarkerstudyinnewlydiagnosedglioblastomacytocclinicaltrial
AT cudkowiczmerite prospectivebiomarkerstudyinnewlydiagnosedglioblastomacytocclinicaltrial
AT conwitrobina prospectivebiomarkerstudyinnewlydiagnosedglioblastomacytocclinicaltrial
AT gudjonsdottirannal prospectivebiomarkerstudyinnewlydiagnosedglioblastomacytocclinicaltrial
AT ecklunddixiej prospectivebiomarkerstudyinnewlydiagnosedglioblastomacytocclinicaltrial
AT fedlerjanelk prospectivebiomarkerstudyinnewlydiagnosedglioblastomacytocclinicaltrial
AT neillhudsontinam prospectivebiomarkerstudyinnewlydiagnosedglioblastomacytocclinicaltrial
AT naborslouisb prospectivebiomarkerstudyinnewlydiagnosedglioblastomacytocclinicaltrial
AT bengemelanie prospectivebiomarkerstudyinnewlydiagnosedglioblastomacytocclinicaltrial
AT hackneyjamesr prospectivebiomarkerstudyinnewlydiagnosedglioblastomacytocclinicaltrial
AT chasemarianne prospectivebiomarkerstudyinnewlydiagnosedglioblastomacytocclinicaltrial
AT leonardtimothyp prospectivebiomarkerstudyinnewlydiagnosedglioblastomacytocclinicaltrial
AT pateltoral prospectivebiomarkerstudyinnewlydiagnosedglioblastomacytocclinicaltrial
AT colmanhoward prospectivebiomarkerstudyinnewlydiagnosedglioblastomacytocclinicaltrial
AT delafuentemacarena prospectivebiomarkerstudyinnewlydiagnosedglioblastomacytocclinicaltrial
AT chaudharyrekha prospectivebiomarkerstudyinnewlydiagnosedglioblastomacytocclinicaltrial
AT marderkaren prospectivebiomarkerstudyinnewlydiagnosedglioblastomacytocclinicaltrial
AT kreislteri prospectivebiomarkerstudyinnewlydiagnosedglioblastomacytocclinicaltrial
AT mohilenimish prospectivebiomarkerstudyinnewlydiagnosedglioblastomacytocclinicaltrial
AT chhedamilang prospectivebiomarkerstudyinnewlydiagnosedglioblastomacytocclinicaltrial
AT mcneillkatharine prospectivebiomarkerstudyinnewlydiagnosedglioblastomacytocclinicaltrial
AT kumthekarpriya prospectivebiomarkerstudyinnewlydiagnosedglioblastomacytocclinicaltrial
AT doganaclan prospectivebiomarkerstudyinnewlydiagnosedglioblastomacytocclinicaltrial
AT drappatzjan prospectivebiomarkerstudyinnewlydiagnosedglioblastomacytocclinicaltrial
AT puduvallivinay prospectivebiomarkerstudyinnewlydiagnosedglioblastomacytocclinicaltrial
AT kowalskaagnes prospectivebiomarkerstudyinnewlydiagnosedglioblastomacytocclinicaltrial
AT graberjerome prospectivebiomarkerstudyinnewlydiagnosedglioblastomacytocclinicaltrial
AT gerstnerelizabeth prospectivebiomarkerstudyinnewlydiagnosedglioblastomacytocclinicaltrial
AT clarkstephen prospectivebiomarkerstudyinnewlydiagnosedglioblastomacytocclinicaltrial
AT salaczmichael prospectivebiomarkerstudyinnewlydiagnosedglioblastomacytocclinicaltrial
AT markertjames prospectivebiomarkerstudyinnewlydiagnosedglioblastomacytocclinicaltrial