Cargando…

Current concepts in hip–spine relationships: making them practical for total hip arthroplasty

Hip, spine, and pelvis move in coordination with one another during activity, forming the lumbopelvic complex (LPC). These movements are characterized by the spinopelvic parameters sacral slope, pelvic tilt, and pelvic incidence, which define a patient’s morphotype. LPC kinematics may be classified...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zagra, Luigi, Benazzo, Francesco, Dallari, Dante, Falez, Francesco, Solarino, Giuseppe, D’Apolito, Rocco, Castelli, Claudio Carlo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bioscientifica Ltd 2022
Materias:
Hip
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8788146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35073513
http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EOR-21-0082
_version_ 1784639495720665088
author Zagra, Luigi
Benazzo, Francesco
Dallari, Dante
Falez, Francesco
Solarino, Giuseppe
D’Apolito, Rocco
Castelli, Claudio Carlo
author_facet Zagra, Luigi
Benazzo, Francesco
Dallari, Dante
Falez, Francesco
Solarino, Giuseppe
D’Apolito, Rocco
Castelli, Claudio Carlo
author_sort Zagra, Luigi
collection PubMed
description Hip, spine, and pelvis move in coordination with one another during activity, forming the lumbopelvic complex (LPC). These movements are characterized by the spinopelvic parameters sacral slope, pelvic tilt, and pelvic incidence, which define a patient’s morphotype. LPC kinematics may be classified by various systems, the most comprehensive of which is the Bordeaux Classification. Hip–spine relationships in total hip arthroplasty (THA) may influence impingement, dislocation, and edge loading. Historical ‘safe zones’ may not apply to patients with impaired spinopelvic mobility; adjustment of cup inclination and version and stem version may be necessary to achieve functional orientation and avert complications. Stem design, bearing surface (including dual mobility), and head size are part of the armamentarium to treat abnormal hip–spine relationships. Special attention should be directed to patients with adult spine deformity or fused spine because they are at increased risk of complications after THA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8788146
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Bioscientifica Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87881462022-01-28 Current concepts in hip–spine relationships: making them practical for total hip arthroplasty Zagra, Luigi Benazzo, Francesco Dallari, Dante Falez, Francesco Solarino, Giuseppe D’Apolito, Rocco Castelli, Claudio Carlo EFORT Open Rev Hip Hip, spine, and pelvis move in coordination with one another during activity, forming the lumbopelvic complex (LPC). These movements are characterized by the spinopelvic parameters sacral slope, pelvic tilt, and pelvic incidence, which define a patient’s morphotype. LPC kinematics may be classified by various systems, the most comprehensive of which is the Bordeaux Classification. Hip–spine relationships in total hip arthroplasty (THA) may influence impingement, dislocation, and edge loading. Historical ‘safe zones’ may not apply to patients with impaired spinopelvic mobility; adjustment of cup inclination and version and stem version may be necessary to achieve functional orientation and avert complications. Stem design, bearing surface (including dual mobility), and head size are part of the armamentarium to treat abnormal hip–spine relationships. Special attention should be directed to patients with adult spine deformity or fused spine because they are at increased risk of complications after THA. Bioscientifica Ltd 2022-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8788146/ /pubmed/35073513 http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EOR-21-0082 Text en © The authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle Hip
Zagra, Luigi
Benazzo, Francesco
Dallari, Dante
Falez, Francesco
Solarino, Giuseppe
D’Apolito, Rocco
Castelli, Claudio Carlo
Current concepts in hip–spine relationships: making them practical for total hip arthroplasty
title Current concepts in hip–spine relationships: making them practical for total hip arthroplasty
title_full Current concepts in hip–spine relationships: making them practical for total hip arthroplasty
title_fullStr Current concepts in hip–spine relationships: making them practical for total hip arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Current concepts in hip–spine relationships: making them practical for total hip arthroplasty
title_short Current concepts in hip–spine relationships: making them practical for total hip arthroplasty
title_sort current concepts in hip–spine relationships: making them practical for total hip arthroplasty
topic Hip
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8788146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35073513
http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EOR-21-0082
work_keys_str_mv AT zagraluigi currentconceptsinhipspinerelationshipsmakingthempracticalfortotalhiparthroplasty
AT benazzofrancesco currentconceptsinhipspinerelationshipsmakingthempracticalfortotalhiparthroplasty
AT dallaridante currentconceptsinhipspinerelationshipsmakingthempracticalfortotalhiparthroplasty
AT falezfrancesco currentconceptsinhipspinerelationshipsmakingthempracticalfortotalhiparthroplasty
AT solarinogiuseppe currentconceptsinhipspinerelationshipsmakingthempracticalfortotalhiparthroplasty
AT dapolitorocco currentconceptsinhipspinerelationshipsmakingthempracticalfortotalhiparthroplasty
AT castelliclaudiocarlo currentconceptsinhipspinerelationshipsmakingthempracticalfortotalhiparthroplasty