Cargando…

Assessing healthcare expenditures of older United States adults with pain and poor versus good mental health status: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine if differences exist in healthcare expenditures of older United States (US) adults with pain based on self-reported mental health status, which is important to know given the prevalence of pain and poor mental health in the USA. DESIGN: This was a cross-sect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Axon, David Rhys, Chien, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8788191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35074808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049727
_version_ 1784639506254659584
author Axon, David Rhys
Chien, Jonathan
author_facet Axon, David Rhys
Chien, Jonathan
author_sort Axon, David Rhys
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine if differences exist in healthcare expenditures of older United States (US) adults with pain based on self-reported mental health status, which is important to know given the prevalence of pain and poor mental health in the USA. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study. SETTING: US Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) interviews. PARTICIPANTS: US adults aged ≥50 years, with self-reported pain in the past 4 weeks and positive healthcare expenditure in the 2018 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). The independent variable was poor versus good mental health status. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Descriptive statistics compared demographic characteristics (using chi-square tests) and mean healthcare expenditures (using t-tests) between groups. Adjusted linear regression models with logarithmically-transformed expenditures compared differences in: total; inpatient; outpatient; emergency room; office-based; prescription medications and other expenditures. Analyses accounted for the complex MEPS design and were weighted to produce nationally-representative results. The a priori alpha level was 0.05. RESULTS: The weighted population included 57 134 711 older US adults with self-reported pain (14.4% poor mental health, 85.6% good mental health). Compared with individuals with good mental health, individuals with poor mental health had higher unadjusted total expenditures (US$20 231 vs US$13 379, p<0.0001), higher prescription medication expenditures (US$5924 vs US$3610, p<0.0001) and higher other expenditures (US$4833 vs US$2285, p<0.0001). In adjusted multivariable linear regression models, there were no differences in expenditures between those with poor mental health and those with good mental health status. CONCLUSIONS: There were no statistically significant differences in adjusted annual (2018) positive healthcare expenditures among older US adults with pain and poor versus good mental health status.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8788191
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87881912022-02-07 Assessing healthcare expenditures of older United States adults with pain and poor versus good mental health status: a cross-sectional study Axon, David Rhys Chien, Jonathan BMJ Open Mental Health OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine if differences exist in healthcare expenditures of older United States (US) adults with pain based on self-reported mental health status, which is important to know given the prevalence of pain and poor mental health in the USA. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional study. SETTING: US Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) interviews. PARTICIPANTS: US adults aged ≥50 years, with self-reported pain in the past 4 weeks and positive healthcare expenditure in the 2018 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). The independent variable was poor versus good mental health status. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Descriptive statistics compared demographic characteristics (using chi-square tests) and mean healthcare expenditures (using t-tests) between groups. Adjusted linear regression models with logarithmically-transformed expenditures compared differences in: total; inpatient; outpatient; emergency room; office-based; prescription medications and other expenditures. Analyses accounted for the complex MEPS design and were weighted to produce nationally-representative results. The a priori alpha level was 0.05. RESULTS: The weighted population included 57 134 711 older US adults with self-reported pain (14.4% poor mental health, 85.6% good mental health). Compared with individuals with good mental health, individuals with poor mental health had higher unadjusted total expenditures (US$20 231 vs US$13 379, p<0.0001), higher prescription medication expenditures (US$5924 vs US$3610, p<0.0001) and higher other expenditures (US$4833 vs US$2285, p<0.0001). In adjusted multivariable linear regression models, there were no differences in expenditures between those with poor mental health and those with good mental health status. CONCLUSIONS: There were no statistically significant differences in adjusted annual (2018) positive healthcare expenditures among older US adults with pain and poor versus good mental health status. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8788191/ /pubmed/35074808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049727 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Mental Health
Axon, David Rhys
Chien, Jonathan
Assessing healthcare expenditures of older United States adults with pain and poor versus good mental health status: a cross-sectional study
title Assessing healthcare expenditures of older United States adults with pain and poor versus good mental health status: a cross-sectional study
title_full Assessing healthcare expenditures of older United States adults with pain and poor versus good mental health status: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Assessing healthcare expenditures of older United States adults with pain and poor versus good mental health status: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Assessing healthcare expenditures of older United States adults with pain and poor versus good mental health status: a cross-sectional study
title_short Assessing healthcare expenditures of older United States adults with pain and poor versus good mental health status: a cross-sectional study
title_sort assessing healthcare expenditures of older united states adults with pain and poor versus good mental health status: a cross-sectional study
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8788191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35074808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049727
work_keys_str_mv AT axondavidrhys assessinghealthcareexpendituresofolderunitedstatesadultswithpainandpoorversusgoodmentalhealthstatusacrosssectionalstudy
AT chienjonathan assessinghealthcareexpendituresofolderunitedstatesadultswithpainandpoorversusgoodmentalhealthstatusacrosssectionalstudy