Cargando…

Patient-driven innovations reported in peer-reviewed journals: a scoping review

BACKGROUND: Awareness of patients’ innovative capabilities is increasing, but there is limited knowledge regarding the extent and nature of patient-driven innovations in the peer-reviewed literature. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the review was to answer the question: what is the nature and extent of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reinius, Maria, Mazzocato, Pamela, Riggare, Sara, Bylund, Ami, Jansson, Hanna, Øvretveit, John, Savage, Carl, Wannheden, Carolina, Hasson, Henna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8788234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35074818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053735
_version_ 1784639516288483328
author Reinius, Maria
Mazzocato, Pamela
Riggare, Sara
Bylund, Ami
Jansson, Hanna
Øvretveit, John
Savage, Carl
Wannheden, Carolina
Hasson, Henna
author_facet Reinius, Maria
Mazzocato, Pamela
Riggare, Sara
Bylund, Ami
Jansson, Hanna
Øvretveit, John
Savage, Carl
Wannheden, Carolina
Hasson, Henna
author_sort Reinius, Maria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Awareness of patients’ innovative capabilities is increasing, but there is limited knowledge regarding the extent and nature of patient-driven innovations in the peer-reviewed literature. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the review was to answer the question: what is the nature and extent of patient-driven innovations published in peer-reviewed scientific journals? ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We used a broad definition of innovation to allow for a comprehensive review of different types of innovations and a narrow definition of ‘patient driven’ to focus on the role of patients and/or family caregivers. The search was limited to years 2008–2020. SOURCES OF EVIDENCE: Four electronic databases (Medline (Ovid), Web of Science Core Collection, PsycINFO (Ovid) and Cinahl (Ebsco)) were searched in December 2020 for publications describing patient-driven innovations and complemented with snowball strategies. CHARTING METHODS: Data from the included articles were extracted and categorised inductively. RESULTS: A total of 96 articles on 20 patient-driven innovations were included. The number of publications increased over time, with 69% of the articles published between 2016 and 2020. Author affiliations were exclusively in high income countries with 56% of first authors in North America and 36% in European countries. Among the 20 innovations reported, ‘Do-It-Yourself Artificial Pancreas System‘ and the online health network ‘PatientsLikeMe’, were the subject of half of the articles. CONCLUSIONS: Peer-reviewed publications on patient-driven innovations are increasing and we see an important opportunity for researchers and clinicians to support patient innovators’ research while being mindful of taking over the work of the innovators themselves.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8788234
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87882342022-02-07 Patient-driven innovations reported in peer-reviewed journals: a scoping review Reinius, Maria Mazzocato, Pamela Riggare, Sara Bylund, Ami Jansson, Hanna Øvretveit, John Savage, Carl Wannheden, Carolina Hasson, Henna BMJ Open Patient-Centred Medicine BACKGROUND: Awareness of patients’ innovative capabilities is increasing, but there is limited knowledge regarding the extent and nature of patient-driven innovations in the peer-reviewed literature. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the review was to answer the question: what is the nature and extent of patient-driven innovations published in peer-reviewed scientific journals? ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We used a broad definition of innovation to allow for a comprehensive review of different types of innovations and a narrow definition of ‘patient driven’ to focus on the role of patients and/or family caregivers. The search was limited to years 2008–2020. SOURCES OF EVIDENCE: Four electronic databases (Medline (Ovid), Web of Science Core Collection, PsycINFO (Ovid) and Cinahl (Ebsco)) were searched in December 2020 for publications describing patient-driven innovations and complemented with snowball strategies. CHARTING METHODS: Data from the included articles were extracted and categorised inductively. RESULTS: A total of 96 articles on 20 patient-driven innovations were included. The number of publications increased over time, with 69% of the articles published between 2016 and 2020. Author affiliations were exclusively in high income countries with 56% of first authors in North America and 36% in European countries. Among the 20 innovations reported, ‘Do-It-Yourself Artificial Pancreas System‘ and the online health network ‘PatientsLikeMe’, were the subject of half of the articles. CONCLUSIONS: Peer-reviewed publications on patient-driven innovations are increasing and we see an important opportunity for researchers and clinicians to support patient innovators’ research while being mindful of taking over the work of the innovators themselves. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8788234/ /pubmed/35074818 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053735 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Patient-Centred Medicine
Reinius, Maria
Mazzocato, Pamela
Riggare, Sara
Bylund, Ami
Jansson, Hanna
Øvretveit, John
Savage, Carl
Wannheden, Carolina
Hasson, Henna
Patient-driven innovations reported in peer-reviewed journals: a scoping review
title Patient-driven innovations reported in peer-reviewed journals: a scoping review
title_full Patient-driven innovations reported in peer-reviewed journals: a scoping review
title_fullStr Patient-driven innovations reported in peer-reviewed journals: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Patient-driven innovations reported in peer-reviewed journals: a scoping review
title_short Patient-driven innovations reported in peer-reviewed journals: a scoping review
title_sort patient-driven innovations reported in peer-reviewed journals: a scoping review
topic Patient-Centred Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8788234/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35074818
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053735
work_keys_str_mv AT reiniusmaria patientdriveninnovationsreportedinpeerreviewedjournalsascopingreview
AT mazzocatopamela patientdriveninnovationsreportedinpeerreviewedjournalsascopingreview
AT riggaresara patientdriveninnovationsreportedinpeerreviewedjournalsascopingreview
AT bylundami patientdriveninnovationsreportedinpeerreviewedjournalsascopingreview
AT janssonhanna patientdriveninnovationsreportedinpeerreviewedjournalsascopingreview
AT øvretveitjohn patientdriveninnovationsreportedinpeerreviewedjournalsascopingreview
AT savagecarl patientdriveninnovationsreportedinpeerreviewedjournalsascopingreview
AT wannhedencarolina patientdriveninnovationsreportedinpeerreviewedjournalsascopingreview
AT hassonhenna patientdriveninnovationsreportedinpeerreviewedjournalsascopingreview