Cargando…

To shoot or not to shoot: experiments on moral injury in the context of West Bank checkpoints and COVID-19 restrictions enforcement

BACKGROUND: Does exposure to events that transgress accepted norms, such as killing innocent civilians, prompt the psychological and emotional consequences of moral injury among soldiers? Moral injury is associated with negative emotions such as guilt, shame and anger, and a sense of betrayal and is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hertz, Uri, Snider, Keren L. G., Levy, Adi, Canetti, Daphna, Gross, Michael L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8788350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35087644
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2021.2013651
_version_ 1784639546286145536
author Hertz, Uri
Snider, Keren L. G.
Levy, Adi
Canetti, Daphna
Gross, Michael L.
author_facet Hertz, Uri
Snider, Keren L. G.
Levy, Adi
Canetti, Daphna
Gross, Michael L.
author_sort Hertz, Uri
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Does exposure to events that transgress accepted norms, such as killing innocent civilians, prompt the psychological and emotional consequences of moral injury among soldiers? Moral injury is associated with negative emotions such as guilt, shame and anger, and a sense of betrayal and is identified among veterans following exposure to potentially morally injurious events (PMIE). OBJECTIVE: We experimentally investigate how PMIE characteristics affect the intensity of MI and related negative moral emotions in participants with varied military experience. METHOD: We conducted three controlled, randomized experiments. Each exposed male respondents with active combat experience (Study 1) and varied military experience (Study 2) to four textual vignettes describing PMIE (child/adult and innocent/non-innocent suspect) that transpire at an Israeli checkpoint in the West Bank. In study 3, we exposed participants to two scenarios, where descriptions of police officers enforcing COVID 19 restrictions confronted lockdown violators. RESULTS: Participants assigned to vignettes describing killing an innocent civilian exhibited more intense levels of shame and guilt than those assigned to vignettes describing killing a person carrying a bomb. Religiosity and political ideology were strong predictors of guilt and shame in response to descriptions of checkpoint shootings. These effects disappeared in Study 3, suggesting that political ideology drives MI in intergroup conflict. CONCLUSIONS: Background and PMIE-related characteristics affect the development of moral injury. Additionally, lab experiments demonstrate the potential and limitations of controlled studies of moral injury and facilitate an understanding of the aetiology of moral injury in a way unavailable to clinicians. Finally, experimental findings and methodologies offer further insights into the genesis of moral injury and avenues for therapy and prophylaxis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8788350
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87883502022-01-26 To shoot or not to shoot: experiments on moral injury in the context of West Bank checkpoints and COVID-19 restrictions enforcement Hertz, Uri Snider, Keren L. G. Levy, Adi Canetti, Daphna Gross, Michael L. Eur J Psychotraumatol Basic Research Article BACKGROUND: Does exposure to events that transgress accepted norms, such as killing innocent civilians, prompt the psychological and emotional consequences of moral injury among soldiers? Moral injury is associated with negative emotions such as guilt, shame and anger, and a sense of betrayal and is identified among veterans following exposure to potentially morally injurious events (PMIE). OBJECTIVE: We experimentally investigate how PMIE characteristics affect the intensity of MI and related negative moral emotions in participants with varied military experience. METHOD: We conducted three controlled, randomized experiments. Each exposed male respondents with active combat experience (Study 1) and varied military experience (Study 2) to four textual vignettes describing PMIE (child/adult and innocent/non-innocent suspect) that transpire at an Israeli checkpoint in the West Bank. In study 3, we exposed participants to two scenarios, where descriptions of police officers enforcing COVID 19 restrictions confronted lockdown violators. RESULTS: Participants assigned to vignettes describing killing an innocent civilian exhibited more intense levels of shame and guilt than those assigned to vignettes describing killing a person carrying a bomb. Religiosity and political ideology were strong predictors of guilt and shame in response to descriptions of checkpoint shootings. These effects disappeared in Study 3, suggesting that political ideology drives MI in intergroup conflict. CONCLUSIONS: Background and PMIE-related characteristics affect the development of moral injury. Additionally, lab experiments demonstrate the potential and limitations of controlled studies of moral injury and facilitate an understanding of the aetiology of moral injury in a way unavailable to clinicians. Finally, experimental findings and methodologies offer further insights into the genesis of moral injury and avenues for therapy and prophylaxis. Taylor & Francis 2022-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8788350/ /pubmed/35087644 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2021.2013651 Text en © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Basic Research Article
Hertz, Uri
Snider, Keren L. G.
Levy, Adi
Canetti, Daphna
Gross, Michael L.
To shoot or not to shoot: experiments on moral injury in the context of West Bank checkpoints and COVID-19 restrictions enforcement
title To shoot or not to shoot: experiments on moral injury in the context of West Bank checkpoints and COVID-19 restrictions enforcement
title_full To shoot or not to shoot: experiments on moral injury in the context of West Bank checkpoints and COVID-19 restrictions enforcement
title_fullStr To shoot or not to shoot: experiments on moral injury in the context of West Bank checkpoints and COVID-19 restrictions enforcement
title_full_unstemmed To shoot or not to shoot: experiments on moral injury in the context of West Bank checkpoints and COVID-19 restrictions enforcement
title_short To shoot or not to shoot: experiments on moral injury in the context of West Bank checkpoints and COVID-19 restrictions enforcement
title_sort to shoot or not to shoot: experiments on moral injury in the context of west bank checkpoints and covid-19 restrictions enforcement
topic Basic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8788350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35087644
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2021.2013651
work_keys_str_mv AT hertzuri toshootornottoshootexperimentsonmoralinjuryinthecontextofwestbankcheckpointsandcovid19restrictionsenforcement
AT sniderkerenlg toshootornottoshootexperimentsonmoralinjuryinthecontextofwestbankcheckpointsandcovid19restrictionsenforcement
AT levyadi toshootornottoshootexperimentsonmoralinjuryinthecontextofwestbankcheckpointsandcovid19restrictionsenforcement
AT canettidaphna toshootornottoshootexperimentsonmoralinjuryinthecontextofwestbankcheckpointsandcovid19restrictionsenforcement
AT grossmichaell toshootornottoshootexperimentsonmoralinjuryinthecontextofwestbankcheckpointsandcovid19restrictionsenforcement