Cargando…
The Effects of Body Tempering on Force Production, Flexibility and Muscle Soreness in Collegiate Football Athletes
There has been limited research to explore the use of body tempering and when the use of this modality would be most appropriate. This study aimed to determine if a body tempering intervention would be appropriate pre-exercise by examining its effects on perceived soreness, range of motion (ROM), an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8788561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35076554 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfmk7010009 |
_version_ | 1784639594522738688 |
---|---|
author | Taber, Christopher B. Colter, Roy J. Davis, Jair J. Seweje, Patrick A. Wilson, Dustin P. Foster, Jonathan Z. Merrigan, Justin J. |
author_facet | Taber, Christopher B. Colter, Roy J. Davis, Jair J. Seweje, Patrick A. Wilson, Dustin P. Foster, Jonathan Z. Merrigan, Justin J. |
author_sort | Taber, Christopher B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | There has been limited research to explore the use of body tempering and when the use of this modality would be most appropriate. This study aimed to determine if a body tempering intervention would be appropriate pre-exercise by examining its effects on perceived soreness, range of motion (ROM), and force production compared to an intervention of traditional stretching. The subjects for this study were ten Division 1 (D1) football linemen from Sacred Heart University (Age: 19.9 ± 1.5 years, body mass: 130.9 ± 12.0 kg, height: 188.4 ± 5.1 cm, training age: 8.0 ± 3.5 years). Subjects participated in three sessions with the first session being baseline testing. The second and third sessions involved the participants being randomized to receive either the body tempering or stretching intervention for the second session and then receiving the other intervention the final week. Soreness using a visual analog scale (VAS), ROM, counter movement jump (CMJ) peak force and jump height, static jump (SJ) peak force and jump height, and isometric mid-thigh pull max force production were assessed. The results of the study concluded that body tempering does not have a negative effect on muscle performance but did practically reduce perceived muscle soreness. Since body tempering is effective at reducing soreness in athletes, it can be recommended for athletes as part of their pre-exercise warmup without negatively effecting isometric or dynamic force production. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8788561 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87885612022-01-26 The Effects of Body Tempering on Force Production, Flexibility and Muscle Soreness in Collegiate Football Athletes Taber, Christopher B. Colter, Roy J. Davis, Jair J. Seweje, Patrick A. Wilson, Dustin P. Foster, Jonathan Z. Merrigan, Justin J. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol Article There has been limited research to explore the use of body tempering and when the use of this modality would be most appropriate. This study aimed to determine if a body tempering intervention would be appropriate pre-exercise by examining its effects on perceived soreness, range of motion (ROM), and force production compared to an intervention of traditional stretching. The subjects for this study were ten Division 1 (D1) football linemen from Sacred Heart University (Age: 19.9 ± 1.5 years, body mass: 130.9 ± 12.0 kg, height: 188.4 ± 5.1 cm, training age: 8.0 ± 3.5 years). Subjects participated in three sessions with the first session being baseline testing. The second and third sessions involved the participants being randomized to receive either the body tempering or stretching intervention for the second session and then receiving the other intervention the final week. Soreness using a visual analog scale (VAS), ROM, counter movement jump (CMJ) peak force and jump height, static jump (SJ) peak force and jump height, and isometric mid-thigh pull max force production were assessed. The results of the study concluded that body tempering does not have a negative effect on muscle performance but did practically reduce perceived muscle soreness. Since body tempering is effective at reducing soreness in athletes, it can be recommended for athletes as part of their pre-exercise warmup without negatively effecting isometric or dynamic force production. MDPI 2022-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8788561/ /pubmed/35076554 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfmk7010009 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Taber, Christopher B. Colter, Roy J. Davis, Jair J. Seweje, Patrick A. Wilson, Dustin P. Foster, Jonathan Z. Merrigan, Justin J. The Effects of Body Tempering on Force Production, Flexibility and Muscle Soreness in Collegiate Football Athletes |
title | The Effects of Body Tempering on Force Production, Flexibility and Muscle Soreness in Collegiate Football Athletes |
title_full | The Effects of Body Tempering on Force Production, Flexibility and Muscle Soreness in Collegiate Football Athletes |
title_fullStr | The Effects of Body Tempering on Force Production, Flexibility and Muscle Soreness in Collegiate Football Athletes |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effects of Body Tempering on Force Production, Flexibility and Muscle Soreness in Collegiate Football Athletes |
title_short | The Effects of Body Tempering on Force Production, Flexibility and Muscle Soreness in Collegiate Football Athletes |
title_sort | effects of body tempering on force production, flexibility and muscle soreness in collegiate football athletes |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8788561/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35076554 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jfmk7010009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT taberchristopherb theeffectsofbodytemperingonforceproductionflexibilityandmusclesorenessincollegiatefootballathletes AT colterroyj theeffectsofbodytemperingonforceproductionflexibilityandmusclesorenessincollegiatefootballathletes AT davisjairj theeffectsofbodytemperingonforceproductionflexibilityandmusclesorenessincollegiatefootballathletes AT sewejepatricka theeffectsofbodytemperingonforceproductionflexibilityandmusclesorenessincollegiatefootballathletes AT wilsondustinp theeffectsofbodytemperingonforceproductionflexibilityandmusclesorenessincollegiatefootballathletes AT fosterjonathanz theeffectsofbodytemperingonforceproductionflexibilityandmusclesorenessincollegiatefootballathletes AT merriganjustinj theeffectsofbodytemperingonforceproductionflexibilityandmusclesorenessincollegiatefootballathletes AT taberchristopherb effectsofbodytemperingonforceproductionflexibilityandmusclesorenessincollegiatefootballathletes AT colterroyj effectsofbodytemperingonforceproductionflexibilityandmusclesorenessincollegiatefootballathletes AT davisjairj effectsofbodytemperingonforceproductionflexibilityandmusclesorenessincollegiatefootballathletes AT sewejepatricka effectsofbodytemperingonforceproductionflexibilityandmusclesorenessincollegiatefootballathletes AT wilsondustinp effectsofbodytemperingonforceproductionflexibilityandmusclesorenessincollegiatefootballathletes AT fosterjonathanz effectsofbodytemperingonforceproductionflexibilityandmusclesorenessincollegiatefootballathletes AT merriganjustinj effectsofbodytemperingonforceproductionflexibilityandmusclesorenessincollegiatefootballathletes |