Cargando…

Attentional Orienting in Front and Rear Spaces in a Virtual Reality Discrimination Task

Recent studies on covert attention suggested that the visual processing of information in front of us is different, depending on whether the information is present in front of us or if it is a reflection of information behind us (mirror information). This difference in processing suggests that we ha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soret, Rébaï, Charras, Pom, Hurter, Christophe, Peysakhovich, Vsevolod
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8788563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35076635
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vision6010003
_version_ 1784639595034443776
author Soret, Rébaï
Charras, Pom
Hurter, Christophe
Peysakhovich, Vsevolod
author_facet Soret, Rébaï
Charras, Pom
Hurter, Christophe
Peysakhovich, Vsevolod
author_sort Soret, Rébaï
collection PubMed
description Recent studies on covert attention suggested that the visual processing of information in front of us is different, depending on whether the information is present in front of us or if it is a reflection of information behind us (mirror information). This difference in processing suggests that we have different processes for directing our attention to objects in front of us (front space) or behind us (rear space). In this study, we investigated the effects of attentional orienting in front and rear space consecutive of visual or auditory endogenous cues. Twenty-one participants performed a modified version of the Posner paradigm in virtual reality during a spaceship discrimination task. An eye tracker integrated into the virtual reality headset was used to make sure that the participants did not move their eyes and used their covert attention. The results show that informative cues produced faster response times than non-informative cues but no impact on target identification was observed. In addition, we observed faster response times when the target occurred in front space rather than in rear space. These results are consistent with an orienting cognitive process differentiation in the front and rear spaces. Several explanations are discussed. No effect was found on subjects’ eye movements, suggesting that participants did not use their overt attention to improve task performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8788563
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87885632022-01-26 Attentional Orienting in Front and Rear Spaces in a Virtual Reality Discrimination Task Soret, Rébaï Charras, Pom Hurter, Christophe Peysakhovich, Vsevolod Vision (Basel) Article Recent studies on covert attention suggested that the visual processing of information in front of us is different, depending on whether the information is present in front of us or if it is a reflection of information behind us (mirror information). This difference in processing suggests that we have different processes for directing our attention to objects in front of us (front space) or behind us (rear space). In this study, we investigated the effects of attentional orienting in front and rear space consecutive of visual or auditory endogenous cues. Twenty-one participants performed a modified version of the Posner paradigm in virtual reality during a spaceship discrimination task. An eye tracker integrated into the virtual reality headset was used to make sure that the participants did not move their eyes and used their covert attention. The results show that informative cues produced faster response times than non-informative cues but no impact on target identification was observed. In addition, we observed faster response times when the target occurred in front space rather than in rear space. These results are consistent with an orienting cognitive process differentiation in the front and rear spaces. Several explanations are discussed. No effect was found on subjects’ eye movements, suggesting that participants did not use their overt attention to improve task performance. MDPI 2022-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8788563/ /pubmed/35076635 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vision6010003 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Soret, Rébaï
Charras, Pom
Hurter, Christophe
Peysakhovich, Vsevolod
Attentional Orienting in Front and Rear Spaces in a Virtual Reality Discrimination Task
title Attentional Orienting in Front and Rear Spaces in a Virtual Reality Discrimination Task
title_full Attentional Orienting in Front and Rear Spaces in a Virtual Reality Discrimination Task
title_fullStr Attentional Orienting in Front and Rear Spaces in a Virtual Reality Discrimination Task
title_full_unstemmed Attentional Orienting in Front and Rear Spaces in a Virtual Reality Discrimination Task
title_short Attentional Orienting in Front and Rear Spaces in a Virtual Reality Discrimination Task
title_sort attentional orienting in front and rear spaces in a virtual reality discrimination task
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8788563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35076635
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vision6010003
work_keys_str_mv AT soretrebai attentionalorientinginfrontandrearspacesinavirtualrealitydiscriminationtask
AT charraspom attentionalorientinginfrontandrearspacesinavirtualrealitydiscriminationtask
AT hurterchristophe attentionalorientinginfrontandrearspacesinavirtualrealitydiscriminationtask
AT peysakhovichvsevolod attentionalorientinginfrontandrearspacesinavirtualrealitydiscriminationtask