Cargando…
Robotic-Assisted Neck Dissection: Our Experience
Introduction Robotic neck dissection surgery allows less invasiveness to significantly improve the aesthetic impact even though it does not compromise the principles of radical cancer procedure. Objective The aim of our work is to describe our personal experience with robotic neck dissection surge...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
2021
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8789484/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35096176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1718957 |
_version_ | 1784639775932678144 |
---|---|
author | Poma, Salvatore Modica, Domenico Michele Pitruzzella, Alessandro Fucarino, Alberto Mattina, Gianfranco Fasola, Salvatore Pirrello, Daniele Galfano, Giuseppe Mario |
author_facet | Poma, Salvatore Modica, Domenico Michele Pitruzzella, Alessandro Fucarino, Alberto Mattina, Gianfranco Fasola, Salvatore Pirrello, Daniele Galfano, Giuseppe Mario |
author_sort | Poma, Salvatore |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction Robotic neck dissection surgery allows less invasiveness to significantly improve the aesthetic impact even though it does not compromise the principles of radical cancer procedure. Objective The aim of our work is to describe our personal experience with robotic neck dissection surgery. Methods A retrospective study was conducted by analyzing 10 patients subjected to a robotic neck dissection surgery. In the period from August 2012 to December 2018, these patients have been treated exclusively with robotic lateral-cervical dissection. Five of them were subjected to robotic-assisted transaxillary neck dissection (RATAND) and the other 5 treated with robotic-assisted retroauricular neck dissection (RARAND), then the surgical results have been compared with 5 similar dissections performed by open neck dissection (OND). Results The average surgical time of RATAND was estimated in 166 minutes, the average surgical time of RARAND was estimated in 153 minutes and the average surgical time of OND was estimated in 48 minutes. Both robotic techniques are valid from the oncological and aesthetic point of view, but in terms of surgical time, they are much longer than the open technique. Conclusions In terms of the post-operative decree, in our opinion, the retroauricular technique is more rapid for the purposes of recovery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8789484 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87894842022-01-27 Robotic-Assisted Neck Dissection: Our Experience Poma, Salvatore Modica, Domenico Michele Pitruzzella, Alessandro Fucarino, Alberto Mattina, Gianfranco Fasola, Salvatore Pirrello, Daniele Galfano, Giuseppe Mario Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol Introduction Robotic neck dissection surgery allows less invasiveness to significantly improve the aesthetic impact even though it does not compromise the principles of radical cancer procedure. Objective The aim of our work is to describe our personal experience with robotic neck dissection surgery. Methods A retrospective study was conducted by analyzing 10 patients subjected to a robotic neck dissection surgery. In the period from August 2012 to December 2018, these patients have been treated exclusively with robotic lateral-cervical dissection. Five of them were subjected to robotic-assisted transaxillary neck dissection (RATAND) and the other 5 treated with robotic-assisted retroauricular neck dissection (RARAND), then the surgical results have been compared with 5 similar dissections performed by open neck dissection (OND). Results The average surgical time of RATAND was estimated in 166 minutes, the average surgical time of RARAND was estimated in 153 minutes and the average surgical time of OND was estimated in 48 minutes. Both robotic techniques are valid from the oncological and aesthetic point of view, but in terms of surgical time, they are much longer than the open technique. Conclusions In terms of the post-operative decree, in our opinion, the retroauricular technique is more rapid for the purposes of recovery. Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2021-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8789484/ /pubmed/35096176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1718957 Text en Fundação Otorrinolaringologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Poma, Salvatore Modica, Domenico Michele Pitruzzella, Alessandro Fucarino, Alberto Mattina, Gianfranco Fasola, Salvatore Pirrello, Daniele Galfano, Giuseppe Mario Robotic-Assisted Neck Dissection: Our Experience |
title | Robotic-Assisted Neck Dissection: Our Experience |
title_full | Robotic-Assisted Neck Dissection: Our Experience |
title_fullStr | Robotic-Assisted Neck Dissection: Our Experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Robotic-Assisted Neck Dissection: Our Experience |
title_short | Robotic-Assisted Neck Dissection: Our Experience |
title_sort | robotic-assisted neck dissection: our experience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8789484/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35096176 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1718957 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pomasalvatore roboticassistedneckdissectionourexperience AT modicadomenicomichele roboticassistedneckdissectionourexperience AT pitruzzellaalessandro roboticassistedneckdissectionourexperience AT fucarinoalberto roboticassistedneckdissectionourexperience AT mattinagianfranco roboticassistedneckdissectionourexperience AT fasolasalvatore roboticassistedneckdissectionourexperience AT pirrellodaniele roboticassistedneckdissectionourexperience AT galfanogiuseppemario roboticassistedneckdissectionourexperience |