Cargando…

Variability in Femoral Preparation and Implantation Between Surgeons Using Manual and Powered Impaction in Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND: The influence of the surgical process on implant loosening and periprosthetic fractures (PPF) as major complications in uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) has rarely been studied because of the difficulty in quantification. Meanwhile, registry analyses have clearly shown a decrease...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Konow, Tobias, Bätz, Johanna, Beverland, David, Board, Tim, Lampe, Frank, Püschel, Klaus, Morlock, Michael M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8789517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35106353
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2021.10.005
_version_ 1784639784575041536
author Konow, Tobias
Bätz, Johanna
Beverland, David
Board, Tim
Lampe, Frank
Püschel, Klaus
Morlock, Michael M.
author_facet Konow, Tobias
Bätz, Johanna
Beverland, David
Board, Tim
Lampe, Frank
Püschel, Klaus
Morlock, Michael M.
author_sort Konow, Tobias
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The influence of the surgical process on implant loosening and periprosthetic fractures (PPF) as major complications in uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) has rarely been studied because of the difficulty in quantification. Meanwhile, registry analyses have clearly shown a decrease in complications with increasing experience. The goal of this study was to determine the extent of variability in THA stem implantation between highly experienced surgeons with respect to implant size, position, press-fit, contact area, primary stability, and the effect of using a powered impaction tool. METHODS: Primary hip stems were implanted in 16 cadaveric femur pairs by three experienced surgeons using manual and powered impaction. Quantitative CTs were taken before and after each process step, and stem tilt, canal-fill-ratio, press-fit, and contact determined. Eleven femur pairs were additionally tested for primary stability under cyclic loading conditions. RESULTS: Manual impactions led to higher variations in press-fit and contact area between the surgeons than powered impactions. Stem tilt and implant sizing varied between surgeons but not between impaction methods. Larger stems exhibited less micromotion than smaller stems. CONCLUSIONS: Larger implants may increase PPF risk, while smaller implants reduce primary stability. The reduced variation for powered impactions indicates that appropriate measures may promote a more standardized process. The variations between these experienced surgeons may represent an acceptable range for this specific stem design. Variability in the implantation process warrants further investigations since certain deviations, for example, a stem tilt toward varus, might increase bone stresses and PPF risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8789517
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87895172022-01-31 Variability in Femoral Preparation and Implantation Between Surgeons Using Manual and Powered Impaction in Total Hip Arthroplasty Konow, Tobias Bätz, Johanna Beverland, David Board, Tim Lampe, Frank Püschel, Klaus Morlock, Michael M. Arthroplast Today Original Research BACKGROUND: The influence of the surgical process on implant loosening and periprosthetic fractures (PPF) as major complications in uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) has rarely been studied because of the difficulty in quantification. Meanwhile, registry analyses have clearly shown a decrease in complications with increasing experience. The goal of this study was to determine the extent of variability in THA stem implantation between highly experienced surgeons with respect to implant size, position, press-fit, contact area, primary stability, and the effect of using a powered impaction tool. METHODS: Primary hip stems were implanted in 16 cadaveric femur pairs by three experienced surgeons using manual and powered impaction. Quantitative CTs were taken before and after each process step, and stem tilt, canal-fill-ratio, press-fit, and contact determined. Eleven femur pairs were additionally tested for primary stability under cyclic loading conditions. RESULTS: Manual impactions led to higher variations in press-fit and contact area between the surgeons than powered impactions. Stem tilt and implant sizing varied between surgeons but not between impaction methods. Larger stems exhibited less micromotion than smaller stems. CONCLUSIONS: Larger implants may increase PPF risk, while smaller implants reduce primary stability. The reduced variation for powered impactions indicates that appropriate measures may promote a more standardized process. The variations between these experienced surgeons may represent an acceptable range for this specific stem design. Variability in the implantation process warrants further investigations since certain deviations, for example, a stem tilt toward varus, might increase bone stresses and PPF risk. Elsevier 2022-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8789517/ /pubmed/35106353 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2021.10.005 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Konow, Tobias
Bätz, Johanna
Beverland, David
Board, Tim
Lampe, Frank
Püschel, Klaus
Morlock, Michael M.
Variability in Femoral Preparation and Implantation Between Surgeons Using Manual and Powered Impaction in Total Hip Arthroplasty
title Variability in Femoral Preparation and Implantation Between Surgeons Using Manual and Powered Impaction in Total Hip Arthroplasty
title_full Variability in Femoral Preparation and Implantation Between Surgeons Using Manual and Powered Impaction in Total Hip Arthroplasty
title_fullStr Variability in Femoral Preparation and Implantation Between Surgeons Using Manual and Powered Impaction in Total Hip Arthroplasty
title_full_unstemmed Variability in Femoral Preparation and Implantation Between Surgeons Using Manual and Powered Impaction in Total Hip Arthroplasty
title_short Variability in Femoral Preparation and Implantation Between Surgeons Using Manual and Powered Impaction in Total Hip Arthroplasty
title_sort variability in femoral preparation and implantation between surgeons using manual and powered impaction in total hip arthroplasty
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8789517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35106353
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2021.10.005
work_keys_str_mv AT konowtobias variabilityinfemoralpreparationandimplantationbetweensurgeonsusingmanualandpoweredimpactionintotalhiparthroplasty
AT batzjohanna variabilityinfemoralpreparationandimplantationbetweensurgeonsusingmanualandpoweredimpactionintotalhiparthroplasty
AT beverlanddavid variabilityinfemoralpreparationandimplantationbetweensurgeonsusingmanualandpoweredimpactionintotalhiparthroplasty
AT boardtim variabilityinfemoralpreparationandimplantationbetweensurgeonsusingmanualandpoweredimpactionintotalhiparthroplasty
AT lampefrank variabilityinfemoralpreparationandimplantationbetweensurgeonsusingmanualandpoweredimpactionintotalhiparthroplasty
AT puschelklaus variabilityinfemoralpreparationandimplantationbetweensurgeonsusingmanualandpoweredimpactionintotalhiparthroplasty
AT morlockmichaelm variabilityinfemoralpreparationandimplantationbetweensurgeonsusingmanualandpoweredimpactionintotalhiparthroplasty