Cargando…

Indocyanine green versus technetium‐99m with blue dye for sentinel lymph node detection in early‐stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

BACKGROUND: The fluorescent dye indocyanine green (ICG) has emerged as a promising tracer for intraoperative detection of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in early‐stage cervical cancer. Although researchers suggest the SLN detection of ICG is equal to the more conventional combined approach of a radiotr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baeten, Ilse G. T., Hoogendam, Jacob P., Jeremiasse, Bernadette, Braat, Arthur J. A. T., Veldhuis, Wouter B., Jonges, Geertruida N., Jürgenliemk‐Schulz, Ina M., van Gils, Carla H., Zweemer, Ronald P., Gerestein, Cornelis G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8789613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33973745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1401
_version_ 1784639808375619584
author Baeten, Ilse G. T.
Hoogendam, Jacob P.
Jeremiasse, Bernadette
Braat, Arthur J. A. T.
Veldhuis, Wouter B.
Jonges, Geertruida N.
Jürgenliemk‐Schulz, Ina M.
van Gils, Carla H.
Zweemer, Ronald P.
Gerestein, Cornelis G.
author_facet Baeten, Ilse G. T.
Hoogendam, Jacob P.
Jeremiasse, Bernadette
Braat, Arthur J. A. T.
Veldhuis, Wouter B.
Jonges, Geertruida N.
Jürgenliemk‐Schulz, Ina M.
van Gils, Carla H.
Zweemer, Ronald P.
Gerestein, Cornelis G.
author_sort Baeten, Ilse G. T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The fluorescent dye indocyanine green (ICG) has emerged as a promising tracer for intraoperative detection of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in early‐stage cervical cancer. Although researchers suggest the SLN detection of ICG is equal to the more conventional combined approach of a radiotracer and blue dye, no consensus has been reached. AIMS: We aimed to assess the differences in overall and bilateral SLN detection rates with ICG versus the combined approach, the radiotracer technetium‐99m ((99m)Tc) with blue dye. METHODS AND RESULTS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to January 1, 2020 and included studies reporting on a comparison of SLN detection with ICG versus (99m)Tc with blue dye in early‐stage cervical cancer. The overall and bilateral detection rates were pooled with random‐effects meta‐analyses. From 118 studies retrieved seven studies (one cross‐sectional; six retrospective cohorts) were included, encompassing 589 patients. No significant differences were found in the pooled overall SLN detection rate of ICG versus (99m)Tc with blue dye. Meta‐analyses of all studies showed ICG to result in a higher bilateral SLN detection rate than (99m)Tc with blue dye; 90.3% (95%CI, 79.8‐100.0%) with ICG versus 73.5% (95%CI, 66.4‐80.6%) with 99mTc with blue dye. This resulted in a significant and clinically relevant risk difference of 16.6% (95%CI, 5.3‐28.0%). With sensitivity analysis, the risk difference of the bilateral detection rate maintained in favor of ICG but was no longer significant (13.2%, 95%CI −0.8‐27.3%). CONCLUSION: ICG appears to provide higher bilateral SLN detection rates compared to (99m)Tc with blue dye in patients with early‐stage cervical cancer. However, in adherence with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines, the quality of evidence is too low to provide strong recommendations and directly omit the combined approach of (99m)Tc with blue dye.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8789613
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87896132022-02-01 Indocyanine green versus technetium‐99m with blue dye for sentinel lymph node detection in early‐stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis Baeten, Ilse G. T. Hoogendam, Jacob P. Jeremiasse, Bernadette Braat, Arthur J. A. T. Veldhuis, Wouter B. Jonges, Geertruida N. Jürgenliemk‐Schulz, Ina M. van Gils, Carla H. Zweemer, Ronald P. Gerestein, Cornelis G. Cancer Rep (Hoboken) Systematic Review BACKGROUND: The fluorescent dye indocyanine green (ICG) has emerged as a promising tracer for intraoperative detection of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in early‐stage cervical cancer. Although researchers suggest the SLN detection of ICG is equal to the more conventional combined approach of a radiotracer and blue dye, no consensus has been reached. AIMS: We aimed to assess the differences in overall and bilateral SLN detection rates with ICG versus the combined approach, the radiotracer technetium‐99m ((99m)Tc) with blue dye. METHODS AND RESULTS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to January 1, 2020 and included studies reporting on a comparison of SLN detection with ICG versus (99m)Tc with blue dye in early‐stage cervical cancer. The overall and bilateral detection rates were pooled with random‐effects meta‐analyses. From 118 studies retrieved seven studies (one cross‐sectional; six retrospective cohorts) were included, encompassing 589 patients. No significant differences were found in the pooled overall SLN detection rate of ICG versus (99m)Tc with blue dye. Meta‐analyses of all studies showed ICG to result in a higher bilateral SLN detection rate than (99m)Tc with blue dye; 90.3% (95%CI, 79.8‐100.0%) with ICG versus 73.5% (95%CI, 66.4‐80.6%) with 99mTc with blue dye. This resulted in a significant and clinically relevant risk difference of 16.6% (95%CI, 5.3‐28.0%). With sensitivity analysis, the risk difference of the bilateral detection rate maintained in favor of ICG but was no longer significant (13.2%, 95%CI −0.8‐27.3%). CONCLUSION: ICG appears to provide higher bilateral SLN detection rates compared to (99m)Tc with blue dye in patients with early‐stage cervical cancer. However, in adherence with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines, the quality of evidence is too low to provide strong recommendations and directly omit the combined approach of (99m)Tc with blue dye. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8789613/ /pubmed/33973745 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1401 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Cancer Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Baeten, Ilse G. T.
Hoogendam, Jacob P.
Jeremiasse, Bernadette
Braat, Arthur J. A. T.
Veldhuis, Wouter B.
Jonges, Geertruida N.
Jürgenliemk‐Schulz, Ina M.
van Gils, Carla H.
Zweemer, Ronald P.
Gerestein, Cornelis G.
Indocyanine green versus technetium‐99m with blue dye for sentinel lymph node detection in early‐stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title Indocyanine green versus technetium‐99m with blue dye for sentinel lymph node detection in early‐stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full Indocyanine green versus technetium‐99m with blue dye for sentinel lymph node detection in early‐stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Indocyanine green versus technetium‐99m with blue dye for sentinel lymph node detection in early‐stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Indocyanine green versus technetium‐99m with blue dye for sentinel lymph node detection in early‐stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_short Indocyanine green versus technetium‐99m with blue dye for sentinel lymph node detection in early‐stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
title_sort indocyanine green versus technetium‐99m with blue dye for sentinel lymph node detection in early‐stage cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8789613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33973745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1401
work_keys_str_mv AT baetenilsegt indocyaninegreenversustechnetium99mwithbluedyeforsentinellymphnodedetectioninearlystagecervicalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hoogendamjacobp indocyaninegreenversustechnetium99mwithbluedyeforsentinellymphnodedetectioninearlystagecervicalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jeremiassebernadette indocyaninegreenversustechnetium99mwithbluedyeforsentinellymphnodedetectioninearlystagecervicalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT braatarthurjat indocyaninegreenversustechnetium99mwithbluedyeforsentinellymphnodedetectioninearlystagecervicalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT veldhuiswouterb indocyaninegreenversustechnetium99mwithbluedyeforsentinellymphnodedetectioninearlystagecervicalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jongesgeertruidan indocyaninegreenversustechnetium99mwithbluedyeforsentinellymphnodedetectioninearlystagecervicalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jurgenliemkschulzinam indocyaninegreenversustechnetium99mwithbluedyeforsentinellymphnodedetectioninearlystagecervicalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vangilscarlah indocyaninegreenversustechnetium99mwithbluedyeforsentinellymphnodedetectioninearlystagecervicalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zweemerronaldp indocyaninegreenversustechnetium99mwithbluedyeforsentinellymphnodedetectioninearlystagecervicalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT geresteincornelisg indocyaninegreenversustechnetium99mwithbluedyeforsentinellymphnodedetectioninearlystagecervicalcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis