Cargando…
Quantifying activities of daily living impairment in Parkinson’s disease using the Functional Activities Questionnaire
OBJECTIVE: Cognitive-driven activity of daily living (ADL) impairment in Parkinson’s disease (PD) is increasingly discussed as prodromal marker for dementia. Diagnostic properties of assessments for this specific ADL impairment are sparsely investigated in PD. The ability of the Functional Activitie...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8789696/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34109514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-021-05365-1 |
_version_ | 1784639829080801280 |
---|---|
author | Becker, Sara Pauly, Claire Lawton, Michael Hipp, Geraldine Bowring, Francesca Sulzer, Patricia Hu, Michele Krüger, Rejko Gasser, Thomas Liepelt-Scarfone, Inga |
author_facet | Becker, Sara Pauly, Claire Lawton, Michael Hipp, Geraldine Bowring, Francesca Sulzer, Patricia Hu, Michele Krüger, Rejko Gasser, Thomas Liepelt-Scarfone, Inga |
author_sort | Becker, Sara |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Cognitive-driven activity of daily living (ADL) impairment in Parkinson’s disease (PD) is increasingly discussed as prodromal marker for dementia. Diagnostic properties of assessments for this specific ADL impairment are sparsely investigated in PD. The ability of the Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) for differentiating between PD patients with normal cognition and with mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI), according to informant and self-reports, was examined. Global cognitive function in groups with and without mild ADL impairment was compared according to different cut-offs. METHODS: Multicenter data of 589 patients of an international cohort (CENTRE-PD) were analyzed. Analyses were run separately for informant-rated and self-rated FAQ. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to define the optimal FAQ cut-off for PD-MCI (≥ 1), and groups were additionally split according to reported FAQ cut-offs for PD-MCI in the literature (≥ 3, ≥ 5). Binary logistic regressions examined the effect of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score in PD patients with and without mild ADL impairment. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-five (38.2%) patients were classified as PD-MCI. For all three cut-off values, sensitivity was moderate to low (< 0.55), but specificity was moderately high (> 0.54) with a tendency of higher values for self-reported deficits. For the self-report, the cut-off ≥ 3 showed a significant effect of the MoCA (B = − 0.31, p = 0.003), where FAQ ≥ 3 patients had worse cognition. No effect for group differences based on informant ratings was detected. CONCLUSION: Our data argue that self-reported ADL impairments assessed by the FAQ show a relation to the severity of cognitive impairment in PD. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10072-021-05365-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8789696 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87896962022-02-02 Quantifying activities of daily living impairment in Parkinson’s disease using the Functional Activities Questionnaire Becker, Sara Pauly, Claire Lawton, Michael Hipp, Geraldine Bowring, Francesca Sulzer, Patricia Hu, Michele Krüger, Rejko Gasser, Thomas Liepelt-Scarfone, Inga Neurol Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: Cognitive-driven activity of daily living (ADL) impairment in Parkinson’s disease (PD) is increasingly discussed as prodromal marker for dementia. Diagnostic properties of assessments for this specific ADL impairment are sparsely investigated in PD. The ability of the Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) for differentiating between PD patients with normal cognition and with mild cognitive impairment (PD-MCI), according to informant and self-reports, was examined. Global cognitive function in groups with and without mild ADL impairment was compared according to different cut-offs. METHODS: Multicenter data of 589 patients of an international cohort (CENTRE-PD) were analyzed. Analyses were run separately for informant-rated and self-rated FAQ. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to define the optimal FAQ cut-off for PD-MCI (≥ 1), and groups were additionally split according to reported FAQ cut-offs for PD-MCI in the literature (≥ 3, ≥ 5). Binary logistic regressions examined the effect of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score in PD patients with and without mild ADL impairment. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-five (38.2%) patients were classified as PD-MCI. For all three cut-off values, sensitivity was moderate to low (< 0.55), but specificity was moderately high (> 0.54) with a tendency of higher values for self-reported deficits. For the self-report, the cut-off ≥ 3 showed a significant effect of the MoCA (B = − 0.31, p = 0.003), where FAQ ≥ 3 patients had worse cognition. No effect for group differences based on informant ratings was detected. CONCLUSION: Our data argue that self-reported ADL impairments assessed by the FAQ show a relation to the severity of cognitive impairment in PD. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10072-021-05365-1. Springer International Publishing 2021-06-10 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8789696/ /pubmed/34109514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-021-05365-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Becker, Sara Pauly, Claire Lawton, Michael Hipp, Geraldine Bowring, Francesca Sulzer, Patricia Hu, Michele Krüger, Rejko Gasser, Thomas Liepelt-Scarfone, Inga Quantifying activities of daily living impairment in Parkinson’s disease using the Functional Activities Questionnaire |
title | Quantifying activities of daily living impairment in Parkinson’s disease using the Functional Activities Questionnaire |
title_full | Quantifying activities of daily living impairment in Parkinson’s disease using the Functional Activities Questionnaire |
title_fullStr | Quantifying activities of daily living impairment in Parkinson’s disease using the Functional Activities Questionnaire |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantifying activities of daily living impairment in Parkinson’s disease using the Functional Activities Questionnaire |
title_short | Quantifying activities of daily living impairment in Parkinson’s disease using the Functional Activities Questionnaire |
title_sort | quantifying activities of daily living impairment in parkinson’s disease using the functional activities questionnaire |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8789696/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34109514 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10072-021-05365-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beckersara quantifyingactivitiesofdailylivingimpairmentinparkinsonsdiseaseusingthefunctionalactivitiesquestionnaire AT paulyclaire quantifyingactivitiesofdailylivingimpairmentinparkinsonsdiseaseusingthefunctionalactivitiesquestionnaire AT lawtonmichael quantifyingactivitiesofdailylivingimpairmentinparkinsonsdiseaseusingthefunctionalactivitiesquestionnaire AT hippgeraldine quantifyingactivitiesofdailylivingimpairmentinparkinsonsdiseaseusingthefunctionalactivitiesquestionnaire AT bowringfrancesca quantifyingactivitiesofdailylivingimpairmentinparkinsonsdiseaseusingthefunctionalactivitiesquestionnaire AT sulzerpatricia quantifyingactivitiesofdailylivingimpairmentinparkinsonsdiseaseusingthefunctionalactivitiesquestionnaire AT humichele quantifyingactivitiesofdailylivingimpairmentinparkinsonsdiseaseusingthefunctionalactivitiesquestionnaire AT krugerrejko quantifyingactivitiesofdailylivingimpairmentinparkinsonsdiseaseusingthefunctionalactivitiesquestionnaire AT gasserthomas quantifyingactivitiesofdailylivingimpairmentinparkinsonsdiseaseusingthefunctionalactivitiesquestionnaire AT liepeltscarfoneinga quantifyingactivitiesofdailylivingimpairmentinparkinsonsdiseaseusingthefunctionalactivitiesquestionnaire |