Cargando…

What brain abnormalities can magnetic resonance imaging detect in foetal and early neonatal spina bifida: a systematic review

PURPOSE: Open spina bifida (OSB) encompasses a wide spectrum of intracranial abnormalities. With foetal surgery as a new treatment option, robust intracranial imaging is important for comprehensive preoperative evaluation and prognostication. We aimed to determine the incidence of infratentorial and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mufti, Nada, Sacco, Adalina, Aertsen, Michael, Ushakov, Fred, Ourselin, Sebastian, Thomson, Dominic, Deprest, Jan, Melbourne, Andrew, David, Anna L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8789702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34792623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-021-02853-1
_version_ 1784639830335946752
author Mufti, Nada
Sacco, Adalina
Aertsen, Michael
Ushakov, Fred
Ourselin, Sebastian
Thomson, Dominic
Deprest, Jan
Melbourne, Andrew
David, Anna L.
author_facet Mufti, Nada
Sacco, Adalina
Aertsen, Michael
Ushakov, Fred
Ourselin, Sebastian
Thomson, Dominic
Deprest, Jan
Melbourne, Andrew
David, Anna L.
author_sort Mufti, Nada
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Open spina bifida (OSB) encompasses a wide spectrum of intracranial abnormalities. With foetal surgery as a new treatment option, robust intracranial imaging is important for comprehensive preoperative evaluation and prognostication. We aimed to determine the incidence of infratentorial and supratentorial findings detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) alone and MRI compared to ultrasound. METHODS: Two systematic reviews comparing MRI to ultrasound and MRI alone were conducted on MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases identifying studies of foetal OSB from 2000 to 2020. Intracranial imaging findings were analysed at ≤ 26 or > 26 weeks gestation and neonates (≤ 28 days). Data was independently extracted by two reviewers and meta-analysis was performed where possible. RESULTS: Thirty-six studies reported brain abnormalities detected by MRI alone in patients who previously had an ultrasound. Callosal dysgenesis was identified in 4/29 cases (2 foetuses ≤ 26 weeks, 1 foetus under any gestation, and 1 neonate ≤ 28 days) (15.1%, CI:5.7–34.3%). Heterotopia was identified in 7/40 foetuses ≤ 26 weeks (19.8%, CI:7.7–42.2%), 9/36 foetuses > 26 weeks (25.3%, CI:13.7–41.9%), and 64/250 neonates ≤ 28 days (26.9%, CI:15.3–42.8%). Additional abnormalities included aberrant cortical folding and other Chiari II malformation findings such as lower cervicomedullary kink level, tectal beaking, and hypoplastic tentorium. Eight studies compared MRI directly to ultrasound, but due to reporting inconsistencies, it was not possible to meta-analyse. CONCLUSION: MRI is able to detect anomalies hitherto underestimated in foetal OSB which may be important for case selection. In view of increasing prenatal OSB surgery, further studies are required to assess developmental consequences of these findings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00234-021-02853-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8789702
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87897022022-02-02 What brain abnormalities can magnetic resonance imaging detect in foetal and early neonatal spina bifida: a systematic review Mufti, Nada Sacco, Adalina Aertsen, Michael Ushakov, Fred Ourselin, Sebastian Thomson, Dominic Deprest, Jan Melbourne, Andrew David, Anna L. Neuroradiology Review PURPOSE: Open spina bifida (OSB) encompasses a wide spectrum of intracranial abnormalities. With foetal surgery as a new treatment option, robust intracranial imaging is important for comprehensive preoperative evaluation and prognostication. We aimed to determine the incidence of infratentorial and supratentorial findings detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) alone and MRI compared to ultrasound. METHODS: Two systematic reviews comparing MRI to ultrasound and MRI alone were conducted on MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases identifying studies of foetal OSB from 2000 to 2020. Intracranial imaging findings were analysed at ≤ 26 or > 26 weeks gestation and neonates (≤ 28 days). Data was independently extracted by two reviewers and meta-analysis was performed where possible. RESULTS: Thirty-six studies reported brain abnormalities detected by MRI alone in patients who previously had an ultrasound. Callosal dysgenesis was identified in 4/29 cases (2 foetuses ≤ 26 weeks, 1 foetus under any gestation, and 1 neonate ≤ 28 days) (15.1%, CI:5.7–34.3%). Heterotopia was identified in 7/40 foetuses ≤ 26 weeks (19.8%, CI:7.7–42.2%), 9/36 foetuses > 26 weeks (25.3%, CI:13.7–41.9%), and 64/250 neonates ≤ 28 days (26.9%, CI:15.3–42.8%). Additional abnormalities included aberrant cortical folding and other Chiari II malformation findings such as lower cervicomedullary kink level, tectal beaking, and hypoplastic tentorium. Eight studies compared MRI directly to ultrasound, but due to reporting inconsistencies, it was not possible to meta-analyse. CONCLUSION: MRI is able to detect anomalies hitherto underestimated in foetal OSB which may be important for case selection. In view of increasing prenatal OSB surgery, further studies are required to assess developmental consequences of these findings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00234-021-02853-1. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-11-18 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8789702/ /pubmed/34792623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-021-02853-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review
Mufti, Nada
Sacco, Adalina
Aertsen, Michael
Ushakov, Fred
Ourselin, Sebastian
Thomson, Dominic
Deprest, Jan
Melbourne, Andrew
David, Anna L.
What brain abnormalities can magnetic resonance imaging detect in foetal and early neonatal spina bifida: a systematic review
title What brain abnormalities can magnetic resonance imaging detect in foetal and early neonatal spina bifida: a systematic review
title_full What brain abnormalities can magnetic resonance imaging detect in foetal and early neonatal spina bifida: a systematic review
title_fullStr What brain abnormalities can magnetic resonance imaging detect in foetal and early neonatal spina bifida: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed What brain abnormalities can magnetic resonance imaging detect in foetal and early neonatal spina bifida: a systematic review
title_short What brain abnormalities can magnetic resonance imaging detect in foetal and early neonatal spina bifida: a systematic review
title_sort what brain abnormalities can magnetic resonance imaging detect in foetal and early neonatal spina bifida: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8789702/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34792623
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-021-02853-1
work_keys_str_mv AT muftinada whatbrainabnormalitiescanmagneticresonanceimagingdetectinfoetalandearlyneonatalspinabifidaasystematicreview
AT saccoadalina whatbrainabnormalitiescanmagneticresonanceimagingdetectinfoetalandearlyneonatalspinabifidaasystematicreview
AT aertsenmichael whatbrainabnormalitiescanmagneticresonanceimagingdetectinfoetalandearlyneonatalspinabifidaasystematicreview
AT ushakovfred whatbrainabnormalitiescanmagneticresonanceimagingdetectinfoetalandearlyneonatalspinabifidaasystematicreview
AT ourselinsebastian whatbrainabnormalitiescanmagneticresonanceimagingdetectinfoetalandearlyneonatalspinabifidaasystematicreview
AT thomsondominic whatbrainabnormalitiescanmagneticresonanceimagingdetectinfoetalandearlyneonatalspinabifidaasystematicreview
AT deprestjan whatbrainabnormalitiescanmagneticresonanceimagingdetectinfoetalandearlyneonatalspinabifidaasystematicreview
AT melbourneandrew whatbrainabnormalitiescanmagneticresonanceimagingdetectinfoetalandearlyneonatalspinabifidaasystematicreview
AT davidannal whatbrainabnormalitiescanmagneticresonanceimagingdetectinfoetalandearlyneonatalspinabifidaasystematicreview