Cargando…
What brain abnormalities can magnetic resonance imaging detect in foetal and early neonatal spina bifida: a systematic review
PURPOSE: Open spina bifida (OSB) encompasses a wide spectrum of intracranial abnormalities. With foetal surgery as a new treatment option, robust intracranial imaging is important for comprehensive preoperative evaluation and prognostication. We aimed to determine the incidence of infratentorial and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8789702/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34792623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-021-02853-1 |
_version_ | 1784639830335946752 |
---|---|
author | Mufti, Nada Sacco, Adalina Aertsen, Michael Ushakov, Fred Ourselin, Sebastian Thomson, Dominic Deprest, Jan Melbourne, Andrew David, Anna L. |
author_facet | Mufti, Nada Sacco, Adalina Aertsen, Michael Ushakov, Fred Ourselin, Sebastian Thomson, Dominic Deprest, Jan Melbourne, Andrew David, Anna L. |
author_sort | Mufti, Nada |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Open spina bifida (OSB) encompasses a wide spectrum of intracranial abnormalities. With foetal surgery as a new treatment option, robust intracranial imaging is important for comprehensive preoperative evaluation and prognostication. We aimed to determine the incidence of infratentorial and supratentorial findings detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) alone and MRI compared to ultrasound. METHODS: Two systematic reviews comparing MRI to ultrasound and MRI alone were conducted on MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases identifying studies of foetal OSB from 2000 to 2020. Intracranial imaging findings were analysed at ≤ 26 or > 26 weeks gestation and neonates (≤ 28 days). Data was independently extracted by two reviewers and meta-analysis was performed where possible. RESULTS: Thirty-six studies reported brain abnormalities detected by MRI alone in patients who previously had an ultrasound. Callosal dysgenesis was identified in 4/29 cases (2 foetuses ≤ 26 weeks, 1 foetus under any gestation, and 1 neonate ≤ 28 days) (15.1%, CI:5.7–34.3%). Heterotopia was identified in 7/40 foetuses ≤ 26 weeks (19.8%, CI:7.7–42.2%), 9/36 foetuses > 26 weeks (25.3%, CI:13.7–41.9%), and 64/250 neonates ≤ 28 days (26.9%, CI:15.3–42.8%). Additional abnormalities included aberrant cortical folding and other Chiari II malformation findings such as lower cervicomedullary kink level, tectal beaking, and hypoplastic tentorium. Eight studies compared MRI directly to ultrasound, but due to reporting inconsistencies, it was not possible to meta-analyse. CONCLUSION: MRI is able to detect anomalies hitherto underestimated in foetal OSB which may be important for case selection. In view of increasing prenatal OSB surgery, further studies are required to assess developmental consequences of these findings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00234-021-02853-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8789702 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87897022022-02-02 What brain abnormalities can magnetic resonance imaging detect in foetal and early neonatal spina bifida: a systematic review Mufti, Nada Sacco, Adalina Aertsen, Michael Ushakov, Fred Ourselin, Sebastian Thomson, Dominic Deprest, Jan Melbourne, Andrew David, Anna L. Neuroradiology Review PURPOSE: Open spina bifida (OSB) encompasses a wide spectrum of intracranial abnormalities. With foetal surgery as a new treatment option, robust intracranial imaging is important for comprehensive preoperative evaluation and prognostication. We aimed to determine the incidence of infratentorial and supratentorial findings detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) alone and MRI compared to ultrasound. METHODS: Two systematic reviews comparing MRI to ultrasound and MRI alone were conducted on MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases identifying studies of foetal OSB from 2000 to 2020. Intracranial imaging findings were analysed at ≤ 26 or > 26 weeks gestation and neonates (≤ 28 days). Data was independently extracted by two reviewers and meta-analysis was performed where possible. RESULTS: Thirty-six studies reported brain abnormalities detected by MRI alone in patients who previously had an ultrasound. Callosal dysgenesis was identified in 4/29 cases (2 foetuses ≤ 26 weeks, 1 foetus under any gestation, and 1 neonate ≤ 28 days) (15.1%, CI:5.7–34.3%). Heterotopia was identified in 7/40 foetuses ≤ 26 weeks (19.8%, CI:7.7–42.2%), 9/36 foetuses > 26 weeks (25.3%, CI:13.7–41.9%), and 64/250 neonates ≤ 28 days (26.9%, CI:15.3–42.8%). Additional abnormalities included aberrant cortical folding and other Chiari II malformation findings such as lower cervicomedullary kink level, tectal beaking, and hypoplastic tentorium. Eight studies compared MRI directly to ultrasound, but due to reporting inconsistencies, it was not possible to meta-analyse. CONCLUSION: MRI is able to detect anomalies hitherto underestimated in foetal OSB which may be important for case selection. In view of increasing prenatal OSB surgery, further studies are required to assess developmental consequences of these findings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00234-021-02853-1. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-11-18 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8789702/ /pubmed/34792623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-021-02853-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Mufti, Nada Sacco, Adalina Aertsen, Michael Ushakov, Fred Ourselin, Sebastian Thomson, Dominic Deprest, Jan Melbourne, Andrew David, Anna L. What brain abnormalities can magnetic resonance imaging detect in foetal and early neonatal spina bifida: a systematic review |
title | What brain abnormalities can magnetic resonance imaging detect in foetal and early neonatal spina bifida: a systematic review |
title_full | What brain abnormalities can magnetic resonance imaging detect in foetal and early neonatal spina bifida: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | What brain abnormalities can magnetic resonance imaging detect in foetal and early neonatal spina bifida: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | What brain abnormalities can magnetic resonance imaging detect in foetal and early neonatal spina bifida: a systematic review |
title_short | What brain abnormalities can magnetic resonance imaging detect in foetal and early neonatal spina bifida: a systematic review |
title_sort | what brain abnormalities can magnetic resonance imaging detect in foetal and early neonatal spina bifida: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8789702/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34792623 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00234-021-02853-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT muftinada whatbrainabnormalitiescanmagneticresonanceimagingdetectinfoetalandearlyneonatalspinabifidaasystematicreview AT saccoadalina whatbrainabnormalitiescanmagneticresonanceimagingdetectinfoetalandearlyneonatalspinabifidaasystematicreview AT aertsenmichael whatbrainabnormalitiescanmagneticresonanceimagingdetectinfoetalandearlyneonatalspinabifidaasystematicreview AT ushakovfred whatbrainabnormalitiescanmagneticresonanceimagingdetectinfoetalandearlyneonatalspinabifidaasystematicreview AT ourselinsebastian whatbrainabnormalitiescanmagneticresonanceimagingdetectinfoetalandearlyneonatalspinabifidaasystematicreview AT thomsondominic whatbrainabnormalitiescanmagneticresonanceimagingdetectinfoetalandearlyneonatalspinabifidaasystematicreview AT deprestjan whatbrainabnormalitiescanmagneticresonanceimagingdetectinfoetalandearlyneonatalspinabifidaasystematicreview AT melbourneandrew whatbrainabnormalitiescanmagneticresonanceimagingdetectinfoetalandearlyneonatalspinabifidaasystematicreview AT davidannal whatbrainabnormalitiescanmagneticresonanceimagingdetectinfoetalandearlyneonatalspinabifidaasystematicreview |