Cargando…
A bioenergetics approach to understanding sex differences in the foraging behaviour of a sexually monomorphic species
Many animals show sexually divergent foraging behaviours reflecting different physiological constraints or energetic needs. We used a bioenergetics approach to examine sex differences in foraging behaviour of the sexually monomorphic northern gannet. We derived a relationship between dynamic body ac...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8790366/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35116139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.210520 |
_version_ | 1784639989392343040 |
---|---|
author | Bennison, Ashley Giménez, Joan Quinn, John L. Green, Jonathan A. Jessopp, Mark |
author_facet | Bennison, Ashley Giménez, Joan Quinn, John L. Green, Jonathan A. Jessopp, Mark |
author_sort | Bennison, Ashley |
collection | PubMed |
description | Many animals show sexually divergent foraging behaviours reflecting different physiological constraints or energetic needs. We used a bioenergetics approach to examine sex differences in foraging behaviour of the sexually monomorphic northern gannet. We derived a relationship between dynamic body acceleration and energy expenditure to quantify the energetic cost of prey capture attempts (plunge dives). Fourteen gannets were tracked using GPS, time depth recorders (TDR) and accelerometers. All plunge dives in a foraging trip represented less than 4% of total energy expenditure, with no significant sex differences in expenditure. Despite females undertaking significantly more dives than males, this low energetic cost resulted in no sex differences in overall energy expenditure across a foraging trip. Bayesian stable isotope mixing models based on blood samples highlighted sex differences in diet; however, calorific intake from successful prey capture was estimated to be similar between sexes. Females experienced 10.28% higher energy demands, primarily due to unequal chick provisioning. Estimates show a minimum of 19% of dives have to be successful for females to meet their daily energy requirements, and 26% for males. Our analyses suggest northern gannets show sex differences in foraging behaviour primarily related to dive rate and success rather than the energetic cost of foraging or energetic content of prey. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8790366 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-87903662022-02-02 A bioenergetics approach to understanding sex differences in the foraging behaviour of a sexually monomorphic species Bennison, Ashley Giménez, Joan Quinn, John L. Green, Jonathan A. Jessopp, Mark R Soc Open Sci Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Many animals show sexually divergent foraging behaviours reflecting different physiological constraints or energetic needs. We used a bioenergetics approach to examine sex differences in foraging behaviour of the sexually monomorphic northern gannet. We derived a relationship between dynamic body acceleration and energy expenditure to quantify the energetic cost of prey capture attempts (plunge dives). Fourteen gannets were tracked using GPS, time depth recorders (TDR) and accelerometers. All plunge dives in a foraging trip represented less than 4% of total energy expenditure, with no significant sex differences in expenditure. Despite females undertaking significantly more dives than males, this low energetic cost resulted in no sex differences in overall energy expenditure across a foraging trip. Bayesian stable isotope mixing models based on blood samples highlighted sex differences in diet; however, calorific intake from successful prey capture was estimated to be similar between sexes. Females experienced 10.28% higher energy demands, primarily due to unequal chick provisioning. Estimates show a minimum of 19% of dives have to be successful for females to meet their daily energy requirements, and 26% for males. Our analyses suggest northern gannets show sex differences in foraging behaviour primarily related to dive rate and success rather than the energetic cost of foraging or energetic content of prey. The Royal Society 2022-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8790366/ /pubmed/35116139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.210520 Text en © 2022 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Bennison, Ashley Giménez, Joan Quinn, John L. Green, Jonathan A. Jessopp, Mark A bioenergetics approach to understanding sex differences in the foraging behaviour of a sexually monomorphic species |
title | A bioenergetics approach to understanding sex differences in the foraging behaviour of a sexually monomorphic species |
title_full | A bioenergetics approach to understanding sex differences in the foraging behaviour of a sexually monomorphic species |
title_fullStr | A bioenergetics approach to understanding sex differences in the foraging behaviour of a sexually monomorphic species |
title_full_unstemmed | A bioenergetics approach to understanding sex differences in the foraging behaviour of a sexually monomorphic species |
title_short | A bioenergetics approach to understanding sex differences in the foraging behaviour of a sexually monomorphic species |
title_sort | bioenergetics approach to understanding sex differences in the foraging behaviour of a sexually monomorphic species |
topic | Organismal and Evolutionary Biology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8790366/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35116139 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.210520 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bennisonashley abioenergeticsapproachtounderstandingsexdifferencesintheforagingbehaviourofasexuallymonomorphicspecies AT gimenezjoan abioenergeticsapproachtounderstandingsexdifferencesintheforagingbehaviourofasexuallymonomorphicspecies AT quinnjohnl abioenergeticsapproachtounderstandingsexdifferencesintheforagingbehaviourofasexuallymonomorphicspecies AT greenjonathana abioenergeticsapproachtounderstandingsexdifferencesintheforagingbehaviourofasexuallymonomorphicspecies AT jessoppmark abioenergeticsapproachtounderstandingsexdifferencesintheforagingbehaviourofasexuallymonomorphicspecies AT bennisonashley bioenergeticsapproachtounderstandingsexdifferencesintheforagingbehaviourofasexuallymonomorphicspecies AT gimenezjoan bioenergeticsapproachtounderstandingsexdifferencesintheforagingbehaviourofasexuallymonomorphicspecies AT quinnjohnl bioenergeticsapproachtounderstandingsexdifferencesintheforagingbehaviourofasexuallymonomorphicspecies AT greenjonathana bioenergeticsapproachtounderstandingsexdifferencesintheforagingbehaviourofasexuallymonomorphicspecies AT jessoppmark bioenergeticsapproachtounderstandingsexdifferencesintheforagingbehaviourofasexuallymonomorphicspecies |