Cargando…

Short-term outcomes of robotic liver resection: An initial single-institution experience

BACKGROUND: Liver surgery has traditionally been characterized by the complexity of its procedures and potentially high rates of morbidity and mortality in inexperienced hands. The robotic approach has gradually been introduced in liver surgery and has increased notably in recent years. However, few...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Durán, Manuel, Briceño, Javier, Padial, Ana, Anelli, Ferdinando Massimiliano, Sánchez-Hidalgo, Juan Manuel, Ayllón, María Dolores, Calleja-Lozano, Rafael, García-Gaitan, Carmen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8790404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35126850
http://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v14.i1.224
_version_ 1784639997764173824
author Durán, Manuel
Briceño, Javier
Padial, Ana
Anelli, Ferdinando Massimiliano
Sánchez-Hidalgo, Juan Manuel
Ayllón, María Dolores
Calleja-Lozano, Rafael
García-Gaitan, Carmen
author_facet Durán, Manuel
Briceño, Javier
Padial, Ana
Anelli, Ferdinando Massimiliano
Sánchez-Hidalgo, Juan Manuel
Ayllón, María Dolores
Calleja-Lozano, Rafael
García-Gaitan, Carmen
author_sort Durán, Manuel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Liver surgery has traditionally been characterized by the complexity of its procedures and potentially high rates of morbidity and mortality in inexperienced hands. The robotic approach has gradually been introduced in liver surgery and has increased notably in recent years. However, few centers currently perform robotic liver surgery and experiences in robot-assisted surgical procedures continue to be limited compared to the laparoscopic approach. AIM: To analyze the outcomes and feasibility of an initial robotic liver program implemented in an experienced laparoscopic hepatobiliary center. METHODS: A total of forty consecutive patients underwent robotic liver resection (da Vinci Xi, intuitive.com, United States) between June 2019 and January 2021. Patients were prospectively followed and retrospectively reviewed. Clinicopathological characteristics and perioperative and short-term outcomes were analyzed. Data are expressed as mean and standard deviation. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 59.55 years, of which 18 (45%) were female. The mean body mass index was 29.41 kg/m². Nine patients (22.5%) were cirrhotic. Patients were divided by type of resection as follows: Ten segmentectomies, three wedge resections, ten left lateral sectionectomies, six bisegmentectomies (two V-VI bisegmentectomies and four IVb-V bisegmentectomies), two right anterior sectionectomies, five left hepatectomies and two right hepatectomies. Malignant lesions occurred in twenty-nine (72.5%) of the patients. The mean operative time was 258.11 min and two patients were transfused intraoperatively (5%). Inflow occlusion was used in thirty cases (75%) and the mean total clamping time was 32.62 min. There was a single conversion due to uncontrollable hemorrhage. Major postoperative complications (Clavien–Dindo > IIIb) occurred in three patients (7.5%) and mortality in one (2.5%). No patient required readmission to the hospital. The mean hospital stay was 5.6 d. CONCLUSION: Although robotic hepatectomy is a safe and feasible procedure with favorable short-term outcomes, it involves a demanding learning curve that requires a high level of training, skill and dexterity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8790404
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87904042022-02-04 Short-term outcomes of robotic liver resection: An initial single-institution experience Durán, Manuel Briceño, Javier Padial, Ana Anelli, Ferdinando Massimiliano Sánchez-Hidalgo, Juan Manuel Ayllón, María Dolores Calleja-Lozano, Rafael García-Gaitan, Carmen World J Hepatol Retrospective Study BACKGROUND: Liver surgery has traditionally been characterized by the complexity of its procedures and potentially high rates of morbidity and mortality in inexperienced hands. The robotic approach has gradually been introduced in liver surgery and has increased notably in recent years. However, few centers currently perform robotic liver surgery and experiences in robot-assisted surgical procedures continue to be limited compared to the laparoscopic approach. AIM: To analyze the outcomes and feasibility of an initial robotic liver program implemented in an experienced laparoscopic hepatobiliary center. METHODS: A total of forty consecutive patients underwent robotic liver resection (da Vinci Xi, intuitive.com, United States) between June 2019 and January 2021. Patients were prospectively followed and retrospectively reviewed. Clinicopathological characteristics and perioperative and short-term outcomes were analyzed. Data are expressed as mean and standard deviation. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 59.55 years, of which 18 (45%) were female. The mean body mass index was 29.41 kg/m². Nine patients (22.5%) were cirrhotic. Patients were divided by type of resection as follows: Ten segmentectomies, three wedge resections, ten left lateral sectionectomies, six bisegmentectomies (two V-VI bisegmentectomies and four IVb-V bisegmentectomies), two right anterior sectionectomies, five left hepatectomies and two right hepatectomies. Malignant lesions occurred in twenty-nine (72.5%) of the patients. The mean operative time was 258.11 min and two patients were transfused intraoperatively (5%). Inflow occlusion was used in thirty cases (75%) and the mean total clamping time was 32.62 min. There was a single conversion due to uncontrollable hemorrhage. Major postoperative complications (Clavien–Dindo > IIIb) occurred in three patients (7.5%) and mortality in one (2.5%). No patient required readmission to the hospital. The mean hospital stay was 5.6 d. CONCLUSION: Although robotic hepatectomy is a safe and feasible procedure with favorable short-term outcomes, it involves a demanding learning curve that requires a high level of training, skill and dexterity. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2022-01-27 2022-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8790404/ /pubmed/35126850 http://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v14.i1.224 Text en ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Retrospective Study
Durán, Manuel
Briceño, Javier
Padial, Ana
Anelli, Ferdinando Massimiliano
Sánchez-Hidalgo, Juan Manuel
Ayllón, María Dolores
Calleja-Lozano, Rafael
García-Gaitan, Carmen
Short-term outcomes of robotic liver resection: An initial single-institution experience
title Short-term outcomes of robotic liver resection: An initial single-institution experience
title_full Short-term outcomes of robotic liver resection: An initial single-institution experience
title_fullStr Short-term outcomes of robotic liver resection: An initial single-institution experience
title_full_unstemmed Short-term outcomes of robotic liver resection: An initial single-institution experience
title_short Short-term outcomes of robotic liver resection: An initial single-institution experience
title_sort short-term outcomes of robotic liver resection: an initial single-institution experience
topic Retrospective Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8790404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35126850
http://dx.doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v14.i1.224
work_keys_str_mv AT duranmanuel shorttermoutcomesofroboticliverresectionaninitialsingleinstitutionexperience
AT bricenojavier shorttermoutcomesofroboticliverresectionaninitialsingleinstitutionexperience
AT padialana shorttermoutcomesofroboticliverresectionaninitialsingleinstitutionexperience
AT anelliferdinandomassimiliano shorttermoutcomesofroboticliverresectionaninitialsingleinstitutionexperience
AT sanchezhidalgojuanmanuel shorttermoutcomesofroboticliverresectionaninitialsingleinstitutionexperience
AT ayllonmariadolores shorttermoutcomesofroboticliverresectionaninitialsingleinstitutionexperience
AT callejalozanorafael shorttermoutcomesofroboticliverresectionaninitialsingleinstitutionexperience
AT garciagaitancarmen shorttermoutcomesofroboticliverresectionaninitialsingleinstitutionexperience