Cargando…

Internet-Based Patient Education Materials Regarding Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Readability and Quality Assessment

BACKGROUND: While diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) are a common complication of diabetes, little is known about the content and readability of online patient education materials (PEM) for DFU. The recommended reading grade level for these materials is grades 6-8. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper was to ev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, David Michael, Grose, Elysia, Cross, Karen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8790680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35014960
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/27221
_version_ 1784640069958631424
author Lee, David Michael
Grose, Elysia
Cross, Karen
author_facet Lee, David Michael
Grose, Elysia
Cross, Karen
author_sort Lee, David Michael
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: While diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) are a common complication of diabetes, little is known about the content and readability of online patient education materials (PEM) for DFU. The recommended reading grade level for these materials is grades 6-8. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper was to evaluate the quality and readability of online PEM on DFU. METHODS: A Google search was performed using 4 different search terms related to DFU. Two readability formulas were used to assess the readability of the included PEM. These included the Flesch-Kincaid grade level and the Flesch-Reading ease score. The DISCERN tool was used to determine quality and reliability. RESULTS: A total of 41 online PEM were included. The average Flesch-Reading ease score for all PEM was 63.43 (SD 14.21), indicating a standard difficulty level of reading. The average reading grade level was 7.85 (SD 2.38), which is higher than the recommended reading level for PEM. The mean DISCERN score was 45.66 (SD 3.34), and 27% (11/41) of the articles had DISCERN scores of less than 39, corresponding to poor or very poor quality. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of online PEM on DFU are written above the recommended reading levels and have significant deficiencies in quality and reliability. Clinicians and patients should be aware of the shortcomings of these resources and consider the impact they may have on patients’ self-management.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8790680
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87906802022-02-03 Internet-Based Patient Education Materials Regarding Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Readability and Quality Assessment Lee, David Michael Grose, Elysia Cross, Karen JMIR Diabetes Original Paper BACKGROUND: While diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) are a common complication of diabetes, little is known about the content and readability of online patient education materials (PEM) for DFU. The recommended reading grade level for these materials is grades 6-8. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper was to evaluate the quality and readability of online PEM on DFU. METHODS: A Google search was performed using 4 different search terms related to DFU. Two readability formulas were used to assess the readability of the included PEM. These included the Flesch-Kincaid grade level and the Flesch-Reading ease score. The DISCERN tool was used to determine quality and reliability. RESULTS: A total of 41 online PEM were included. The average Flesch-Reading ease score for all PEM was 63.43 (SD 14.21), indicating a standard difficulty level of reading. The average reading grade level was 7.85 (SD 2.38), which is higher than the recommended reading level for PEM. The mean DISCERN score was 45.66 (SD 3.34), and 27% (11/41) of the articles had DISCERN scores of less than 39, corresponding to poor or very poor quality. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of online PEM on DFU are written above the recommended reading levels and have significant deficiencies in quality and reliability. Clinicians and patients should be aware of the shortcomings of these resources and consider the impact they may have on patients’ self-management. JMIR Publications 2022-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8790680/ /pubmed/35014960 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/27221 Text en ©David Michael Lee, Elysia Grose, Karen Cross. Originally published in JMIR Diabetes (https://diabetes.jmir.org), 11.01.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Diabetes, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://diabetes.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Lee, David Michael
Grose, Elysia
Cross, Karen
Internet-Based Patient Education Materials Regarding Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Readability and Quality Assessment
title Internet-Based Patient Education Materials Regarding Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Readability and Quality Assessment
title_full Internet-Based Patient Education Materials Regarding Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Readability and Quality Assessment
title_fullStr Internet-Based Patient Education Materials Regarding Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Readability and Quality Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Internet-Based Patient Education Materials Regarding Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Readability and Quality Assessment
title_short Internet-Based Patient Education Materials Regarding Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Readability and Quality Assessment
title_sort internet-based patient education materials regarding diabetic foot ulcers: readability and quality assessment
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8790680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35014960
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/27221
work_keys_str_mv AT leedavidmichael internetbasedpatienteducationmaterialsregardingdiabeticfootulcersreadabilityandqualityassessment
AT groseelysia internetbasedpatienteducationmaterialsregardingdiabeticfootulcersreadabilityandqualityassessment
AT crosskaren internetbasedpatienteducationmaterialsregardingdiabeticfootulcersreadabilityandqualityassessment