Cargando…

Patients’ Expectations and Experiences With a Mental Health–Focused Supportive Text Messaging Program: Mixed Methods Evaluation

BACKGROUND: Web-based services are an economical and easily scalable means of support that uses existing technology. Text4Support is a supportive, complementary text messaging service that supports people with different mental health conditions after they are discharged from inpatient psychiatric ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shalaby, Reham, Vuong, Wesley, Eboreime, Ejemai, Surood, Shireen, Greenshaw, Andrew J, Agyapong, Vincent Israel Opoku
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8790698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35014972
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/33438
_version_ 1784640074339581952
author Shalaby, Reham
Vuong, Wesley
Eboreime, Ejemai
Surood, Shireen
Greenshaw, Andrew J
Agyapong, Vincent Israel Opoku
author_facet Shalaby, Reham
Vuong, Wesley
Eboreime, Ejemai
Surood, Shireen
Greenshaw, Andrew J
Agyapong, Vincent Israel Opoku
author_sort Shalaby, Reham
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Web-based services are an economical and easily scalable means of support that uses existing technology. Text4Support is a supportive, complementary text messaging service that supports people with different mental health conditions after they are discharged from inpatient psychiatric care. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aim to assess user satisfaction with the Text4Support service to gain a better understanding of subscribers’ experiences. METHODS: This was a mixed methods study using secondary data from a pilot observational controlled trial. The trial included 181 patients discharged from acute psychiatric care and distributed into 4 randomized groups. Out of the 4 study groups in the initial study, 2 groups who received supportive text messages (89/181, 49.2% of patients), either alone or alongside a peer support worker, were included. Thematic and descriptive analyses were also performed. Differences in feedback based on sex at birth and primary diagnosis were determined using univariate analysis. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (trial registration number: NCT03404882). RESULTS: Out of 89 participants, 36 (40%) completed the follow-up survey. The principal findings were that Text4Support was well perceived with a high satisfaction rate either regarding the feedback of the messages or their perceived impact. Meanwhile, there was no statistically significant difference between satisfactory items based on the subscriber’s sex at birth or primary diagnosis. The patients’ initial expectations were either neutral or positive in relation to the expected nature or the impact of the text messages received on their mental well-being. In addition, the subscribers were satisfied with the frequency of the messages, which were received once daily for 6 consecutive months. The participants recommended more personalized messages or mutual interaction with health care personnel. CONCLUSIONS: Text4Support was generally well perceived by patients after hospital discharge, regardless of their sex at birth or mental health diagnosis. Further personalization and interactive platforms were recommended by participants that may need to be considered when designing similar future services.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8790698
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87906982022-02-03 Patients’ Expectations and Experiences With a Mental Health–Focused Supportive Text Messaging Program: Mixed Methods Evaluation Shalaby, Reham Vuong, Wesley Eboreime, Ejemai Surood, Shireen Greenshaw, Andrew J Agyapong, Vincent Israel Opoku JMIR Form Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Web-based services are an economical and easily scalable means of support that uses existing technology. Text4Support is a supportive, complementary text messaging service that supports people with different mental health conditions after they are discharged from inpatient psychiatric care. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aim to assess user satisfaction with the Text4Support service to gain a better understanding of subscribers’ experiences. METHODS: This was a mixed methods study using secondary data from a pilot observational controlled trial. The trial included 181 patients discharged from acute psychiatric care and distributed into 4 randomized groups. Out of the 4 study groups in the initial study, 2 groups who received supportive text messages (89/181, 49.2% of patients), either alone or alongside a peer support worker, were included. Thematic and descriptive analyses were also performed. Differences in feedback based on sex at birth and primary diagnosis were determined using univariate analysis. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (trial registration number: NCT03404882). RESULTS: Out of 89 participants, 36 (40%) completed the follow-up survey. The principal findings were that Text4Support was well perceived with a high satisfaction rate either regarding the feedback of the messages or their perceived impact. Meanwhile, there was no statistically significant difference between satisfactory items based on the subscriber’s sex at birth or primary diagnosis. The patients’ initial expectations were either neutral or positive in relation to the expected nature or the impact of the text messages received on their mental well-being. In addition, the subscribers were satisfied with the frequency of the messages, which were received once daily for 6 consecutive months. The participants recommended more personalized messages or mutual interaction with health care personnel. CONCLUSIONS: Text4Support was generally well perceived by patients after hospital discharge, regardless of their sex at birth or mental health diagnosis. Further personalization and interactive platforms were recommended by participants that may need to be considered when designing similar future services. JMIR Publications 2022-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8790698/ /pubmed/35014972 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/33438 Text en ©Reham Shalaby, Wesley Vuong, Ejemai Eboreime, Shireen Surood, Andrew J Greenshaw, Vincent Israel Opoku Agyapong. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 11.01.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Formative Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://formative.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Shalaby, Reham
Vuong, Wesley
Eboreime, Ejemai
Surood, Shireen
Greenshaw, Andrew J
Agyapong, Vincent Israel Opoku
Patients’ Expectations and Experiences With a Mental Health–Focused Supportive Text Messaging Program: Mixed Methods Evaluation
title Patients’ Expectations and Experiences With a Mental Health–Focused Supportive Text Messaging Program: Mixed Methods Evaluation
title_full Patients’ Expectations and Experiences With a Mental Health–Focused Supportive Text Messaging Program: Mixed Methods Evaluation
title_fullStr Patients’ Expectations and Experiences With a Mental Health–Focused Supportive Text Messaging Program: Mixed Methods Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Patients’ Expectations and Experiences With a Mental Health–Focused Supportive Text Messaging Program: Mixed Methods Evaluation
title_short Patients’ Expectations and Experiences With a Mental Health–Focused Supportive Text Messaging Program: Mixed Methods Evaluation
title_sort patients’ expectations and experiences with a mental health–focused supportive text messaging program: mixed methods evaluation
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8790698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35014972
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/33438
work_keys_str_mv AT shalabyreham patientsexpectationsandexperienceswithamentalhealthfocusedsupportivetextmessagingprogrammixedmethodsevaluation
AT vuongwesley patientsexpectationsandexperienceswithamentalhealthfocusedsupportivetextmessagingprogrammixedmethodsevaluation
AT eboreimeejemai patientsexpectationsandexperienceswithamentalhealthfocusedsupportivetextmessagingprogrammixedmethodsevaluation
AT suroodshireen patientsexpectationsandexperienceswithamentalhealthfocusedsupportivetextmessagingprogrammixedmethodsevaluation
AT greenshawandrewj patientsexpectationsandexperienceswithamentalhealthfocusedsupportivetextmessagingprogrammixedmethodsevaluation
AT agyapongvincentisraelopoku patientsexpectationsandexperienceswithamentalhealthfocusedsupportivetextmessagingprogrammixedmethodsevaluation