Cargando…

Structural engineering from an inverse problems perspective

The field of structural engineering is vast, spanning areas from the design of new infrastructure to the assessment of existing infrastructure. From the onset, traditional entry-level university courses teach students to analyse structural responses given data including external forces, geometry, me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gallet, A., Rigby, S., Tallman, T. N., Kong, X., Hajirasouliha, I., Liew, A., Liu, D., Chen, L., Hauptmann, A., Smyl, D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8791046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35153609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2021.0526
_version_ 1784640135776698368
author Gallet, A.
Rigby, S.
Tallman, T. N.
Kong, X.
Hajirasouliha, I.
Liew, A.
Liu, D.
Chen, L.
Hauptmann, A.
Smyl, D.
author_facet Gallet, A.
Rigby, S.
Tallman, T. N.
Kong, X.
Hajirasouliha, I.
Liew, A.
Liu, D.
Chen, L.
Hauptmann, A.
Smyl, D.
author_sort Gallet, A.
collection PubMed
description The field of structural engineering is vast, spanning areas from the design of new infrastructure to the assessment of existing infrastructure. From the onset, traditional entry-level university courses teach students to analyse structural responses given data including external forces, geometry, member sizes, restraint, etc.—characterizing a forward problem (structural causalities [Formula: see text] structural response). Shortly thereafter, junior engineers are introduced to structural design where they aim to, for example, select an appropriate structural form for members based on design criteria, which is the inverse of what they previously learned. Similar inverse realizations also hold true in structural health monitoring and a number of structural engineering sub-fields (response [Formula: see text] structural causalities). In this light, we aim to demonstrate that many structural engineering sub-fields may be fundamentally or partially viewed as inverse problems and thus benefit via the rich and established methodologies from the inverse problems community. To this end, we conclude that the future of inverse problems in structural engineering is inexorably linked to engineering education and machine learning developments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8791046
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-87910462022-02-11 Structural engineering from an inverse problems perspective Gallet, A. Rigby, S. Tallman, T. N. Kong, X. Hajirasouliha, I. Liew, A. Liu, D. Chen, L. Hauptmann, A. Smyl, D. Proc Math Phys Eng Sci Review Articles The field of structural engineering is vast, spanning areas from the design of new infrastructure to the assessment of existing infrastructure. From the onset, traditional entry-level university courses teach students to analyse structural responses given data including external forces, geometry, member sizes, restraint, etc.—characterizing a forward problem (structural causalities [Formula: see text] structural response). Shortly thereafter, junior engineers are introduced to structural design where they aim to, for example, select an appropriate structural form for members based on design criteria, which is the inverse of what they previously learned. Similar inverse realizations also hold true in structural health monitoring and a number of structural engineering sub-fields (response [Formula: see text] structural causalities). In this light, we aim to demonstrate that many structural engineering sub-fields may be fundamentally or partially viewed as inverse problems and thus benefit via the rich and established methodologies from the inverse problems community. To this end, we conclude that the future of inverse problems in structural engineering is inexorably linked to engineering education and machine learning developments. The Royal Society 2022-01 2022-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8791046/ /pubmed/35153609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2021.0526 Text en © 2022 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Review Articles
Gallet, A.
Rigby, S.
Tallman, T. N.
Kong, X.
Hajirasouliha, I.
Liew, A.
Liu, D.
Chen, L.
Hauptmann, A.
Smyl, D.
Structural engineering from an inverse problems perspective
title Structural engineering from an inverse problems perspective
title_full Structural engineering from an inverse problems perspective
title_fullStr Structural engineering from an inverse problems perspective
title_full_unstemmed Structural engineering from an inverse problems perspective
title_short Structural engineering from an inverse problems perspective
title_sort structural engineering from an inverse problems perspective
topic Review Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8791046/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35153609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2021.0526
work_keys_str_mv AT galleta structuralengineeringfromaninverseproblemsperspective
AT rigbys structuralengineeringfromaninverseproblemsperspective
AT tallmantn structuralengineeringfromaninverseproblemsperspective
AT kongx structuralengineeringfromaninverseproblemsperspective
AT hajirasoulihai structuralengineeringfromaninverseproblemsperspective
AT liewa structuralengineeringfromaninverseproblemsperspective
AT liud structuralengineeringfromaninverseproblemsperspective
AT chenl structuralengineeringfromaninverseproblemsperspective
AT hauptmanna structuralengineeringfromaninverseproblemsperspective
AT smyld structuralengineeringfromaninverseproblemsperspective